Perceptual graph model systems

Group Decision and Negotiation

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 261-277

  Obeidi, Amer ^a   Kilgour, D Marc ^b   Hipel, Keith W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Emotion; Graph Model for Conflict Resolution; Graph model system; Perceptual graph models; Possibility principle; Strategic conflict

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349210016     PISSN: 09262644     EISSN: 15729907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-008-9154-6     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. A Bechara AR Damasio 2005 The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision Games Econ Behav 52 336 372 10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010 (Pubitemid 41051728)
2. PG Bennett 1977 Toward a theory of hypergames Omega 5 6 749 751 10.1016/0305-0483(77)90056-1
3. PG Bennett 1980 Hypergames: developing a model of conflicts Futures 12 6 489 507 10.1016/0016-3287(80)90005-1 (Pubitemid 11486152)
4. Caddy JF (2001) The Caddy report: the Lobster Resource in the Miramichi Bay. The State of Knowledge of the Lobster Resource in the Miramichi Bay and Adjacent Waters; Some Suggestions for Conflict Resolution over Fishing Seasons, and Ideas for Fisheries Research in Support of Lobster Management. http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/
5. Damasio AR (1994) Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam's Sons, New York
6. Damasio AR (2003) Looking for Spinoza: joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Harcourt, Orlando, FL
7. JR Dunn ME Schweitzer 2005 Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust J Pers Soc Psychol 88 5 736 748 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736 (Pubitemid 40735499)
8. Fang L, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (1993) Interactive decision making: the graph model for conflict resolution. Wiley, New York
9. Fraser N, Hipel KW (1984) Conflict analysis: models and resolutions. North Holland, New York
10. Howard N (1971) Paradoxes of rationality: theory of metagames and political behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
11. N Howard PG Bennett J Bryant M Bradley 1992 Manifesto for a theory of drama and irrational choice J Oper Res Soc 44 99 103 10.2307/2584447
12. T Inohara 2000 Interperceptional equilibrium as a generalization of Nash equilibrium in games with interperception IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A 30 6 625 638
13. TS Jones A Bodtker 2001 Mediating with heart in mind: addressing emotion in mediation practice Negotiat J 17 3 217 244 10.1023/A:1013283710190 (Pubitemid 33706023)
14. LeDoux J (2000) Cognitive-emotional interaction: listen to the brain. In: Lane RD, Nadel L Cognitive neuroscience of emotion. Oxford University Press, New York
15. Obeidi A, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (2003) Emotion: the missing ingredient in conflict analysis. In: Proceedings the 2003 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, Washington, D.C., October 5-8, pp 3322-3329
16. Obeidi A, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (2005a) Perception and Emotion in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. In: Proceedings the 2005 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Hilton Waikoloa Village, The Big Island of Hawaii, October 9-12, pp 1126-1131
17. A Obeidi KW Hipel DM Kilgour 2005 The role of emotions in envisioning outcomes in conflict analysis Group Decis Negotiat 14 6 481 500 10.1007/s10726-005-9004-8
18. Obeidi A, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2006) Turbulence in Miramichi Bay: the Burnt Church conflict over native Fishing Rights. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42(6):1629-1645. JAWRA. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb06025.x
19. Supreme Court of Canada (1999a) R. v. Marshall. File No. 26014, September 17. http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/pub/1999/vol3/html/1999scr3-0456. html
20. Supreme Court of Canada (1999b) R. v. Marshall. File No. 26014, November 17. http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/pub/1999/vol3/html/1999scr3-0533. html
21. M Wang KW Hipel NM Fraser 1988 Modeling misperception in games Behav Sci 33 3 207 223 10.1002/bs.3830330305