Interperceptional equilibrium as a generalization of Nash equilibrium in games with interperception

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans.

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 625-638

  Inohara, Takehiro ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

DECISION MAKERS; DRAMA THEORY; EMOTIONS; INTERPERCEPTIONAL EQUILIBRIUM; IRRATIONALITY; LOGICALNESS; NASH EQUILIBRIUM; SENTIMENTS; SOLUTION CONCEPTS;

GAME THEORY;

EID: 0034313477     PISSN: 10834427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/3468.895886     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. P. G. Bennett and M. R. Dando, "Complex strategic analysis: A hyper-game study of the fall of France," J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23-32, 1979.
2. P. G. Bennett, "Hypergames: Developing a model of conflict," Futures, vol. 12, pp. 489-507, 1980.
3. P. G. Bennett and N. Howard, "Rationality, emotion and preference change: drama-theoretic models of choice," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 92, pp. 603-614, 1996.
4. L. Berkowitz and K. Heimer, "On the construction of the anger experience: Aversive events and negative priming in the formation of feelings," in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, L. Berkowitz, Ed. New York: Academic, 1989, vol. 22, pp. 1-37.
5. J. Bryant, "All the world's a stage: Using drama theory to resolve confrontation," OR Insight, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 14-21, 1997.
6. D. Cartwright and F. Harary, "Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory," Psychol. Rev., vol. 63, pp. 277-293, 1956.
7. J. Eichberger, Game Theory for Economists. New York: Academic, 1993.
8. J. Harada, "The effects of positive and negative experiences on helping behavior," Jpn. Psychol. Res., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 47-51, 1983.
9. F. Heider, "Attitudes and cognitive organization," J. Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 107-112, 1946.
10. N. Howard, Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1971.
11. _, "'Soft' game theory," Information and Decision Technologies, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 215-227, 1990.
12. _, "Drama theory and its relation to game theory," Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 3, pp. 187-235, 1994.
13. _, "Negotiation as drama: How 'games' become dramatic," International Negotiation, vol. 1, pp. 125-152, 1996.
14. _, "n-person 'Soft' games," J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 49, pp. 144-150, 1998.
15. T. Inohara and B. Nakano, "Properties of 'soft' games with mutual exchange of inducement tactics," Inf. Syst. Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 131-148, 1995.
16. T. Inohara, S. Takahashi, and B. Nakano, "Impossibility of deception in a conflict among subjects with interdependent preference," Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 81, no. 2/3, pp. 221-244, 1997.
17. _, "Integration of games and hypergames generated from a class of games," J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 48, pp. 423-432, 1997.
18. T. Inohara, "A formal theory on decision making with interperception," Doctoral dissertation, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan, 1997.
19. _, "On conditions for a meeting not to reach a deadlock," Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 1998.
20. M. D. Mesarovic, D. Macko, and Y. Takahara, Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel, Systems. New York: Academic, 1970.
21. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1953.
22. M. Wang, K. W. Hipel, and N. M. Fraser, "Solution concepts in hypergames," Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 147-171, 1989.