The contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala to individual differences in amphetamine-induced hyperactivity

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 202, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 11-18

  Cain, Mary E ^a   Coolon, Rosemary A ^a   Gill, Margaret J ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Central nucleus of the amygdala; Conditioned hyperactivity; Locomotor; Muscimol; Novelty; Sensitization

Indexed keywords

DEXAMPHETAMINE; MUSCIMOL; PHOSPHATE BUFFERED SALINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CANNULA; CONDITIONING; CONSCIOUSNESS DISORDER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYPERACTIVITY; IMPLANT; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SENSITIZATION; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

AMPHETAMINE; AMYGDALA; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CATHETERIZATION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AGENTS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; MALE; MICROINJECTIONS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MUSCIMOL; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67349182665     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alheid G.F., and Heimer L. New perspectives in basal forebrain organization of special relevance for neuropsychiatric disorders: the striatopallidal, amygdaloid, and corticopetal components of the substantia innominata. Neuroscience 27 (1988) 1-39
2. Alleweireldt A.T., Hobbs R.J., Taylor A.R., and Neisewander J.L. Effects of SCH-23390 infused into the amygdala or adjacent cortex and basal ganglia on cocaine seeking and self-administration in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (2006) 363-374
3. Bardo M.T., and Bevins R.A. Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward?. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 153 (2000) 31-43
4. Beaulieu S., DiPaolo T., and Barden N. Control of ACTH secretion by the central nucleus of the amygdala: implication of the serotonergic system and its relevance to the glucocorticoid delayed feedback mechanism. Neuroendocrinology 44 (1986) 247-254
5. Belin D., Mar A.C., Dalley J.W., Robbins T.W., and Everitt B.J. High impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine-taking. Science 320 (2008) 1352-1355
6. Bevins R.A., and Peterson J.L. Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 79 (2004) 65-74
7. Bradberry C.W., Gruen R.J., Berridge C.W., and Roth R.H. Individual differences in behavioral measures: correlations with nucleus accumbens dopamine measured by microdialysis. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 39 (1991) 877-882
8. Cador M., Dulluc J., and Mormede P. Modulation of the locomotor response to amphetamine by corticosterone. Neuroscience 56 (1993) 981-988
9. Cain M.E., Denehy E.D., and Bardo M.T. Individual differences in amphetamine self-administration: the role of the central nucleus of the amygdala. Neuropsychopharmacology 33 (2008) 1149-1161
10. Cain M.E., Saucier D.A., and Bardo M.T. Novelty seeking and drug use: contribution of an animal model. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 13 (2005) 367-375
11. Cain M.E., Smith C.M., and Bardo M.T. The effect of novelty on amphetamine self-administration in rats classified as high and low responders. Psychopharmacology 176 (2004) 129-138
12. Caine S.B., Heinrichs S.C., Coffin V.L., and Koob G.F. Effects of the dopamine D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 microinjected into the accumbens, amygdala, or striatum on cocaine self-administration in the rat. Brain Res 692 (1995) 47-56
13. Chefer V.I., Zakharova I., and Shippenberg T.S. Enhanced responsiveness to novelty and cocaine is associated with decreased basal dopamine uptake and release in the nucleus accumbens: quantitative microdialysis in rats under transient conditions. J Neurosci 23 (2003) 3076-3084
14. Chevrette J., Stellar J.R., Hesse G.W., and Markou A. Both the shell of the nucleus accumbens and the central nucleus of the amygdala support amphetamine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 71 (2002) 501-507
15. Conklin C.A. Environments as cues to smoke: implications for human extinction-based research and treatment. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 14 (2006) 12-19
16. Coolon RA, Cain ME. Individual differences in response to novelty and the conditioned locomotor effects of nicotine; submitted for publication.
17. Cunningham C.L. Pavlovian drug conditioning. In: Van Haaren F. (Ed). Methods in behavioral pharmacology (1993), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 349-381
18. Damianopoulos E.N., and Carey R.J. Conditioning, habituation and behavioral reorganization factors in chronic cocaine effects. Behav Brain Res 49 (1992) 149-157
19. Davis M. The role of the amygdala in conditioned and unconditioned fear and anxiety. In: Aggleton J.P. (Ed). The amygdala: a functional analysis (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford 213-287
20. Davis M., and Whalen P.J. The amygdala: vigilance and emotion. Mol Psychiatry 6 (2001) 13-34
21. Deroche-Gamonet V., Belin D., and Piazza P.V. Evidence for addiction-like behavior in the rat. Science 305 (2004) 1014-1017
22. Dietz D.M., Dietz K.C., Moore S., Ouimet C.C., and Kabbaj M. Repeated social defeat stress-induced sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of d-amphetamine: role of individual differences. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 198 (2008) 51-62
23. Donohew R.L., Lorch E.P., and Palmgreen P. Sensation seeking and targeting of televised anti-drug PSAs. In: Donohew L., Sypher H., and Bukoski (Eds). Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention (1991), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale 209-226
24. Edeline J.M., Hars B., Hennevin E., and Cotillon N. Muscimol diffusion after intracerebral microinjections: a reevaluation based on electrophysiological and autoradiographic quantifications. Neurobiol Learn Mem 78 (2002) 100-124
25. Erb S.M., and Parker L.A. Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48 (1994) 581-586
26. Exner M., and Clark D. Behaviour in the novel environment predicts responsiveness to d-amphetamine in the rat: a multivariate approach. Behav Pharmacol 4 (1993) 47-56
27. Gold L.H., Swerdlow N.R., and Koob G.F. The role of mesolimbic dopamine in conditioned locomotion produced by amphetamine. Behav Neurosci 102 (1988) 544-552
28. Hall J.S., Parkinson J.A., Connor T.M., Dickinson A., and Everitt B.J. Involvement of the central nucleus of the amygdala and nucleus accumbens core in mediating Pavlovian influences on instrumental behavior. Eur J Neurosci 13 (2001) 1984-1992
29. Heimer L., deOlmos J., Alheid G.F., and Zaborsky L. Perestroika in the basal forebrain: opening the border between neurology and psychiatry. In: Holstege G. (Ed). Progress in brain research, vol. 87 (1991), Elsevier, Amsterdam 109-165
30. Hinson R.E., and Poulos C.X. Sensitization to the behavioral effects of cocaine: modification by Pavlovian conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15 (1981) 559-562
31. Hooks M.S., Jones D.N., Holtzman S.G., Juncos J.L., Kalivas P.W., and Justice Jr. J.B. Individual differences in behavior following amphetamine, GBR-12909, or apomorphine but not SKF-38393 or quinpirole. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 116 (1994) 217-225
32. Hooks M.S., Jones G.H., Neill D.B., and Justice Jr. J.B. Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization: dose-dependent effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 41 (1992) 203-210
33. Hooks M.S., Jones G.H., Smith A.D., Neill D.B., and Justice J.B. Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38 (1991) 467-470
34. Hooks M.S., Jones G.H., Smith A.D., Neill D.B., and Justice Jr. J.B. Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine. Synapse 9 (1991) 121-128
35. Jodogne C., Marinelli M., Le Moal M., and Piazza P.V. Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show a higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Res 657 (1994) 236-244
36. Kabbaj M., Devine D.P., Savage V.R., and Akil H. Neurobiological correlates of individual differences in novelty seeking behavior in the rat: differential expression of stress-related molecules. J Neurosci 20 (2000) 6893-6988
37. Kapp B., Silverstri A., Guaracci F., Moynihan J.E., and Cain M.E. Associative and EEG arousal-related characteristics of amygdaloid central nucleus neurons in the rabbit. Soc Neurosci Abst 23 (1997) 787
38. Kapp B.S., and Cain M.E. The neural basis of arousal. In: Smelser N.J., and Battes P.B. (Eds). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, vol. 2 (2001), Elsevier Science, New York 754-758
39. Kapp B.S., Frysinger R.C., Gallagher M., and Haselton J. Amygdala central nucleus lesions: effects on heart rate conditioning in the rabbit. Physiol Behav 23 (1979) 1109-1117
40. Kapp B.S., Whalen P.J., Silvestri A.J., Jordan M.P., and Fechter J.H. The effect of amygdaloid lesions on the acquisition of EEG and heart rate conditioned responses in the rabbit. Soc Neurosci Abst 19 (1993) 1230
41. Klebaur J.E., Bevins R.A., Segar T.M., and Bardo M.T. Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administration in male and female rats. Behav Pharmacol 12 (2001) 267-275
42. Marinelli M. The many facets of the locomotor response to a novel environment test: theoretical comment on Mitchell, Cunningham, and Mark (2005). Behav Neurosci 119 (2005) 1144-1151
43. Marinelli M., and White F.J. Enhanced vulnerability to cocaine self-administration is associated with elevated impulse activity of midbrain dopamine neurons. J Neurosci 20 (2000) 8876-8885
44. Martin J.H. Autoradiographic estimation of the extent of reversible inactivation produced by microinjection of lidocaine and muscimol in the rat. Neurosci Lett 127 (1991) 160-164
45. McEchron M.D., McCabe P.M., Green E.J., Llabre M.M., and Schneidermann N.M. Simultaneous single unit recordings in the medial geniculate nucleus and amygdaloid central nucleus through habituation, acquisition, and extinction of rabbits classically conditioned heart rate. Brain Res 682 (1995) 157-166
46. Misslin R., Herzog F., Koch B., and Ropartz P. Effects of isolation, handling, and novelty on the pituitary-adrenal response in the mouse. Psychoneuroendocrinology 7 (1982) 217-221
47. Moreira C.M., Masson S., Carvalho M.C., and Brandao M.L. Exploratory behaviour of rats in the elevated plus-maze is differentially sensitive to inactivation of the basolateral and central amygdaloid nuclei. Brain Res Bull 71 (2007) 466-474
48. Nader K., Majidishad P., Amorapanth P., and LeDoux J.E. Damage to the lateral and central, but not other, amygdaloid nuclei prevent the acquisition of auditory fear conditioning. Learn Mem 8 (2001) 156-163
49. O'Brien C.P., Childress A.R., McLellan A.T., and Ehrman R. Classical conditioning in drug-dependent humans. Ann NY Acad Sci 654 (1992) 400-415
50. O'Dell L.E., Sussman A.N., Meyer K.L., and Neisewander J.L. Behavioral effects of psychomotor stimulant infusions into amygdaloid nuclei. Neuropsychopharmacology 20 (1999) 591-602
51. Pare D., Quirk G.J., and LeDoux J.E. New vistas on amygdala networks in conditioned fear. J Neurophysiol 92 (2004) 1-9
52. Paxinos G., and Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates (1998), Academic Press, San Diego p. 256
53. Pelloux Y., Costentin J., and Duterte-Boucher D. Differential effects of novelty exposure on place preference conditioning to amphetamine and its oral consumption. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 171 (2004) 277-285
54. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., and Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245 (1989) 1511-1513
55. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Maccari S., Le Moal M., Mormede P., and Simon H. Individual vulnerability to drug self-administration: action of corticosterone on dopaminergic systems as a possible pathophysiological mechanism. In: Willner P., and Scheel-Kruger J. (Eds). The mesolimbic dopamine system: from motivation to action (1991), Wiley, New York 473-495
56. Piazza P.V., Deroche V., Deminiere J.M., Maccari S., Le Moal M., and Simon H. Corticosterone in the range of stress-induced levels possesses reinforcing properties: implications for sensation-seeking behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90 (1993) 11738-11742
57. Piazza P.V., and Le Moal M. The role of stress in drug self-administration. Trends Pharmacol Sci 19 (1998) 67-74
58. Piazza P.V., Rouge-Pont F., Deminiere J.M., Kharoubi M., Le Moal M., and Simon H. Dopaminergic activity is reduced in the prefrontal cortex and increased in the nucleus accumbens of rats predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res 567 (1991) 169-174
59. Pierre P.J., and Vezina P. Predisposition to self-administration amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug. Psychopharmacology 129 (1997) 277-284
60. Sanders S.K., and Shekhar A. Regulation of anxiety by GABAA receptors in the rat amygdala. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 52 (1995) 701-706
61. See R.E. Neural substrates of conditioned-cued relapse to drug-seeking behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 71 (2002) 517-529
62. Shaham Y., Shalev U., Lu L., De Wit H., and Stewart J. The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 168 (2003) 3-20
63. Siegel S., Baptista M.A., Kim J.A., McDonald R.V., and Weise-Kelly L. Pavlovian psychopharmacology: the associative basis of tolerance. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 8 (2000) 276-293
64. Stewart J. Neurobiology of conditioning to drugs of abuse. Ann NY Acad Sci 654 (1992) 335-346
65. Stewart J. Pathways to relapse: factors controlling the reinitiation of drug seeking after abstinence. Nebr Symp Motiv 50 (2004) 197-234
66. Stewart J., and Eikelboom R. Conditioned drug effects. New directions in behavioral pharmacology, vol. 19 (1987), Plenum, NY p. 1-57
67. Wilkinson J.L., and Bevins R.A. Bupropion hydrochloride produces conditioned hyperactivity in rats. Physiol Behav 90 (2007) 790-796
68. Wills T.A., Vaccaro D., and McNamara G. Novelty seeking, risk taking, and related constructs as predictors of adolescent substance abuse: an application of Cloninger's theory. J Substance Abuse 6 (1994) 1-20
69. Wills T.A., Windle M., and Cleary S.D. Temperament and novelty seeking in adolescent substance abuse: convergence of dimensions of temperament with constructs from Cloninger's theory. J Personal Social Psychol 74 (1998) 387-406
70. Zhu J., Bardo M.T., Bruntz R.C., Stairs D.J., and Dwoskin L.P. Individual differences in response to novelty predict prefrontal cortex dopamine transporter function and cell surface expression. Eur J Neurosci 26 (2007) 717-728
71. Zuckerman M. Behavioral expressions biosocial bases of sensation seeking (1994), Cambridge, New York p. 463