Reliability of regulatory networks and its evolution

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 258, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 502-512

  Braunewell, Stefan ^a   Bornholdt, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boolean networks; Computer simulation; Evolution models; Gene regulatory networks; Robustness

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA; GENETIC ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INFORMATION SCIENCE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; NERVE NET;

EID: 67349140927     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Albert R., and Othmer H.G. The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Theor. Biol. 223 1 (2003) 1-18
2. Aldana M., Balleza E., Kauffman S., and Resendiz O. Robustness and evolvability in genetic regulatory networks. J. Theor. Biol. 245 (2007) 433-448
3. Alon U., Surette M.G., Barkai N., and Leibler S. Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397 (1999) 168-171
4. Barkai N., and Leibler S. Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387 6636 (1997) 913-917
5. Becskei A., and Serrano L. Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature 405 6786 (2000) 590-593
6. Bornholdt S. Systems biology: less is more in modeling large genetic networks. Science 310 5747 (2005) 449-451
7. Bornholdt S., and Sneppen K. Robustness as an evolutionary principle. Proc. R. Soc. London B 267 (2000) 2281
8. Braunewell S., and Bornholdt S. Superstability of the yeast cell-cycle dynamics: ensuring causality in the presence of biochemical stochasticity. J. Theor. Biol. 245 4 (2007) 638-643
9. Braunewell, S., Bornholdt, S., 2008. Reliability of genetic networks is evolvable. Phys. Rev. E 77 (6), 060902(R).
10. Chaves M., Albert R., and Sontag E.D. Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. J. Theor. Biol. 235 (2005) 431-449
11. Chaves M., Sontag E.D., and Albert R. Methods of robustness analysis for Boolean models of gene control networks. IEE Proc. Syst. Biol. 153 4 (2006) 154-167
12. Ciliberti S., Martin O.C., and Wagner A. Robustness can evolve gradually in complex regulatory gene networks with varying topology. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3 2 (2007)
13. Davidich, M.I., Bornholdt, S., 2008. Boolean network model predicts cell cycle sequence of fission yeast. PLoS ONE 3, el672, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001672.
14. Elowitz M.B., and Leibler S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403 (2000) 335-338
15. Espinosa-Soto C., Padilla-Longoria P., and Alvarez-Buylla E.R. A gene regulatory network model for cell-fate determination during Arabidopsis thaliana flower development that is robust and recovers experimental gene expression profiles. Plant Cell 16 11 (2004) 2923-2939
16. Gillespie D.T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81 25 (1977) 2340-2361
17. Glass L. Combinatorial and topological methods in nonlinear chemical kinetics. J. Phys. Chem. 63 4 (1975) 1325-1335
18. Greil F., and Drossel B. Dynamics of critical Kauffman networks under asynchronous stochastic update. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 4 (2005) 048701
19. Kauffman S.A. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J. Theor. Biol. 22 (1969) 437-467
20. Kauffman S.A. The Origins of Order (1993), Oxford University Press, New York
21. Kepler T.B., and Elston T.C. Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. Biophys. J. 81 6 (2001) 3116-3136
22. Klemm K., and Bornholdt S. Stable and unstable attractors in Boolean networks. Phys. Rev. E 72 5 (2005) 055101R
23. Klemm K., and Bornholdt S. Topology of biological networks and reliability of information processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 51 (2005) 18414-18419
24. Kollmann M., Lovdok L., Bartholome K., Timmer J., and Sourjik V. Design principles of a bacterial signalling network. Nature 438 7067 (2005) 504-507
25. Li F., Long T., Lu Y., Ouyang Q., and Tang C. The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 14 (2004) 4781-4786
26. Ma W., Lai L., Ouyang Q., and Tang C. Robustness and modular design of the drosophila segment polarity network. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2 (2006) 70
27. McAdams H.H., and Arkin A. It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. Trends Genet. 15 2 (1999) 65-69
28. Ozbudak E.M., Thattai M., Kurtser I., Grossman A.D., and van Oudenaarden A. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat. Genet. 31 1 (2002) 69-73
29. Rao C.V., Wolf D.M., and Arkin A.P. Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise. Nature 420 (2002) 231-237
30. Raser J.M., and O'Shea E.K. Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science 309 5743 (2005) 2010-2013
31. Szejka A., and Drossel B. Evolution of canalizing Boolean networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 56 (2007) 373-380
32. Thattai M., and van Oudenaarden A. Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 15 (2001) 8614-8619
33. Tononi G., Sporns O., and Edelman G.M. Measures of degeneracy and redundancy in biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 6 (1999) 3257-3262
34. von Dassow G., Meir E., Munro E.M., and Odell G.M. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406 (2000) 188-192
35. Wagner A. Does evolutionary plasticity evolve?. Evolution 50 (1996) 1008-1023
36. Wagner A. Circuit topology and the evolution of robustness in two-gene circadian oscillators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 33 (2005) 11775-11780
37. Wagner A. Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. Bioessays 27 2 (2005) 176-188