Axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy compared with conventional C3-C7 laminoplasty: A modified laminoplasty preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 22, 2005, Pages 2544-2549

  Takeuchi, Kazunari ^a   Yokoyama, Toru ^a   Aburakawa, Shuichi ^a   Saito, Akira ^a   Numasawa, Takuya ^a   Iwasaki, Tetsuya ^a   Itabashi, Taito ^a   Okada, Akihiro ^a   Ito, Junji ^b   Ueyama, Kazumasa ^c   Toh, Satoshi ^a  

^a HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b AOMORI PREFECTURAL CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c National Hospital Organization   (Japan)

Author keywords

Axial symptoms; Cervical myelopathy; Cervical spine; Laminoplasty; Semispinalis cervicis muscle

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LAMINECTOMY; LAMINOPLASTY; NECK MUSCLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULAR ATROPHY; NECK MUSCLES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27944501109     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186332.66490.ba     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, et al. Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop 2003;294:129-39.
2. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, et al. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 2001;26:479-87.
3. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, et al. Results of skip laminectomy: minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2003;28:2667-72.
4. Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty: a noticeable complication. Spine 1996;21:1969-73.
5. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Ishihara H, et al. Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 1999;12:392-5.
6. Yoshida M, Tamaki T, Kawakami M, et al. Does reconstruction of posterior ligamentous complex with extensor musculature decrease axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty? Spine 2002;27:1414-8.
7. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, et al. Preventive measures for axial symptoms following cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 2003;16:497-501.
8. Iizuka H, Shimizu T, Tateno K, et al. Extensor musculature of the cervical spine after laminoplasty: morphologic evaluation by coronal view of the magnetic resonance image. Spine 2001;26:2220-6.
9. Kurokawa T, Nakamura K, Hoshino Y. On double door laminoplasty splitting spinous processes of cervical spine [in Japanese]. Rinsho Seikeigeka 1995;30:566-71.
10. Nakano K, Harata S, Suetsuna F, et al. Spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spinous process spacer. Spine 1992;17(suppl):41-3.
11. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Toribatake Y, et al. Expansive midline T-saw laminoplasty (modified spinous process-splitting) for the management of cervical myelopathy. Spine 1998;23:32-37.
12. Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep 1966;19:3-11.
13. Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, et al. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 2001;26:1443-7.
14. Nolan JP Jr, Sherk HH. Biomechanical evaluation of the extensor musculature of the cervical spine. Spine 1988;13:9-11.
15. Sherk HH. Stability of the lower cervical spine. In: Kehr P, Weidner A, eds. Cervical Spine, vol. 1. New York: Springer Verlag, 1987:59-64.
16. Conley MS, Meyer RA, Bloomberg JJ, et al. Noninvasive analysis of human neck muscle function. Spine 1995;20:2505-12.
17. Conley MS, Stone MH, Nimmons M, et al. Specificity of resistance training responses in neck muscle size and strength. Eur J Appl Physiol 1997;75:443-8.
18. Vasabada AN, Li S, Delp SL. Influence of muscle morphometry and moment arms on the moment-generating capacity of human neck muscles. Spine 1998;23:412-22.
19. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, et al. Tension-band laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Int Orthop 1996;20:275-84.
20. Yoshida M, Otani K, Shibasaki K, et al. Expansive laminoplasty with reattachment of spinous process and extensor musculature for cervical myelopathy. Spine 1992;17:491-7.
21. Baisden J, Voo LM, Cusick JF, et al. Evaluation of cervical laminectomy and laminoplasty: a longitudinal study in the goat model. Spine 1999;24:1283-9.