Results of Skip Laminectomy - Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study Compared with Open-Door Laminoplasty

Spine

Volumn 28, Issue 24, 2003, Pages 2667-2672

  Shiraishi, Tateru ^a   Fukuda, Kentaro ^b   Yato, Yoshiyuki ^a   Nakamura, Mitsukazu ^c   Ikegami, Takeshi ^a  

^a Imperial Foundation Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c National Hospital Organization   (Japan)

Author keywords

Axial symptoms; Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Laminoplasty; Minimally invasive surgery; Posterior decompression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL MYELOPATHY; CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAMINECTOMY; LAMINOPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE ATROPHY; NECK MUSCLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE SURGERY; SPONDYLOSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPINAL OSTEOPHYTOSIS;

EID: 0348011515     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000103340.78418.B2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Shitaishi T. Skip laminectomy-a new treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, preserving bilateral muscular attachments to the spinous processes: a preliminary report. Spine J. 2002;2:108-115.
2. Fehlings MG, Skaf G. A review of the pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with insights for potential novel mechanisms drawn from traumatic spinal cord injury. Spine. 1998;23:2730-2737.
3. Fukui K, Kataoka O, Sho T, et al. Pathomechanism, pathogenesis and results of treatment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by dynamic canal stenosis. Spine. 1990;15:1148-1152.
4. Hayashi K, Okada K, Hamada M, et al. Etiologic factors of myelopathy: a radiographic evaluation of the aging changes in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop. 1987;214:200-209.
5. Penning L. Some aspects of plain radiography of the cervical spine in chronic myelopathy. Neurology. 1962;12:513-519.
6. White AA, Panjabi MM. Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 1988;13:856-860.
7. Shiraishi T. A new technique for exposure of the cervical spine laminae: technical note. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(Spine 1):122-126.
8. Hirabayashi K, Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine. 1988;13:870-876.
9. Ishihara A. Roentgenological investigation on the cervical lordosis of normal subjects [in Japanese]. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1968;42:1033-1044.
10. Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa M, et al. Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. Int Orthop. 1995;19:116-121.
11. Edward CC, Heller JG, Murakami H. Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine. 2002;27:1168-1175.
12. Hidai Y, Ebara S, Kamimura M, et al. Treatment of cervical myelopathy with a new dorsolateral decompressive procedure. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(Spine 2):178-185.
13. Hukuda S, Ogata M, Mochizuki T, et al. Laminectomy versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: brief report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:325-326.
14. Itoh T, Tsuji H. Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine. Spine. 1985;10:729-746.
15. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H. Double door laminoplasty through longitudinal splitting of the spinous processes for cervical myelopathy. Rinsho Seikei Geka. 1984;19:483-490.
16. O'Brien MF, Peterson D, Casey AT. A novel technique for laminoplasty augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization: a computerized morphometric analysis. Spine. 1996;21:474-484.
17. Okamoto A, Shinomiya K, Furuya K. Reduced neck movement after operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Int Orthop. 1995;19:295-297.
18. Satomi K, Nishi Y, Kohno T, et al. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 1994;19:507-510.
19. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, et al. Tension-band laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Int Orthop. 1996;20:257-284.
20. Yoshida M, Otani K, Shibasaki K, et al. Expansive laminoplasty with reattachment of spinous process and extensor musculature for cervical myelopathy. Spine. 1992;17:491-497.
21. Nolan JP, Sherk HH. Biomechanical evaluation of the extensor musculature of the cervical spine. Spine. 1988;13:9-11.
22. Vasavada AN, Li S, Delp S. Influence of muscle morphometry and moment arms on the moment-generating capacity of human neck muscles. Spine. 1998;23:412-422.
23. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, et al. Extradural tethering effect as one mechanism of radiculopathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine. 1996;21:203-211.