Grasping psychoanalysts' practice in its own merits

International Journal of Psychoanalysis

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 231-248

  Jiménez, Juan Pablo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Clinical validation; Pluralism; Practical reasons; Psychoanalysis and truth; Psychoanalyst's mind; Psychoanalytic phenomenology; Psychoanalytic practice; Psychoanalytic theory; Psychoanalytic theory of change; Theoretical reasons; Working party

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONVALESCENCE; EPISTEMOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; ORGANIZATION; PHENOMENOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIST; REVIEW; ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY;

FREUDIAN THEORY; HUMANS; JUNGIAN THEORY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY;

EID: 66849122622     PISSN: 00207578     EISSN: 17458315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00132.x     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Ablon JS, Jones EE (1998). How expert clinicians' prototypes of an ideal treatment correlate with outcome in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Psychother Res 8:71-83.
2. Aisenstein M (2003). Does the cure come as a byproduct of psychoanalytic treatment? Psychoanal Q 72:263-273
3. Bernardi R (1989). The role of paradigmatic determinants in psychoanalytic understanding. Int J Psychoanal 70:341-357
4. Bernardi R (2002). The need for true controversies in psychoanalysis: The debates on Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan in the Rio de la Plata. Int J Psychoanal 83:851-873
5. Bernardi R (2003). What kind of evidence makes the analyst change his or her theoretical and technical ideas? In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis, 125-136 London: IPA.
6. Bernardi R (2005). What after pluralism? Ulysses still on the road. Psychoanal Inq 25:654-666
7. Bleger J (1973). Criterios de curación y objetivos del psicoanálisis. Rev Psicoanál APA 30:317-342
8. Brenner C (1982). The mind in conflict. New York, NY: International UP.
9. Canestri J (1994). Transformations. Int J Psychoanal 75:1079-1092
10. Canestri J (2006). Psychoanalysis from practice to theory. Chichester: Wiley.
11. Canestri J, Bohleber W, Denis P, Fonagy P (2006). The map of private (implicit, preconscious) theories in clinical practise. In: Canestri J, editor. Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory, 29-44. New York, NY: Wiley.
12. Dreher U (2000). Foundation for conceptual research in psychoanalysis. (Psychoanalytic Monograph.) London: Karnac.
13. Etchegoyen H (1986). Los fundamentos de la técnica psicoanalítica. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
14. Ferrater Mora J (1969). Diccionario de filosofía. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.
15. Figuera SA (1994). Toward the dissection of the psychoanalyst's mind: The psychoanalytic technical superego. In: The analyst's mind: From listening to interpretation, 31-41. London: IPA.
16. Fonagy P (2006). The failure of practice to inform theory and the role of implicit theory in bridging the transmission gap. In: Canestri J, editor. Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory, 69-86. Chichester: Wiley.
17. Freud S (1893f). Charcot. SE 3, 7-23.
18. Freud S (1927a). Postscript to The question of lay analysis. SE 20, 251-258
19. Freud S (1933a). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. SE 22, 1-182.
20. Gabbard GO, Westen D (2003). Rethinking therapeutic action. Int J Psychoanal 84:823-841
21. Goldfried MR, Raue PJ, Castonguay LG (1998). The therapeutic focus in significant sessions of master therapists: A comparison of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol 66:803-810
22. Gunderson JG, Gabbard GO (1999). Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment. JAPA 47(3):679-704.
23. Hamilton V (1996). The analyst's preconscious. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
24. Jiménez JP (2003). A psychoanalytical phenomenology of perversion. Int J Psychoanal 85:65-82.
25. Jiménez JP (2005). The search for integration or how to work as a pluralist psychoanalyst. Psychoanal Inq 25:602-634
26. Jiménez JP (2006). After pluralism: Towards a new, integrated psychoanalytic paradigm. Int J Psychoanal 87:1-20.
27. Jiménez JP (2007). Can research influence clinical practice? Int J Psychoanal 88:661-679
28. Jiménez JP (2008). Theoretical plurality and pluralism in psychoanalytic practice. Int J Psychoanal 89:579-599
29. Jones EE, Pulos SM (1993). Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 61:306-316
30. Kvale S (1995). The social construction of validity. Qual Inq 1:19-40.
31. Luyten P, Blatt SJ, Corveylen J (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. JAPA 54:571-610. (Pubitemid 43875055)
32. Mendizabal R (1959). Diccionario griego-español ilustrado. Madrid: Razón y Fe.
33. Orlinsky DE, Ronnestad MH (2005). How psychotherapists develop: A study of therapeutic work and professional growth. Washington, DC: APA.
34. PCSG (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The 'something more' than interpretation. Int J Psychoanal 79:903-921
35. Pulver SE (1987a). How theory shapes technique: Perspectives on a clinical study. Prologue. Psychoanal Inq 7:141-145
36. Pulver SE (1987b). How theory shapes technique: Perspectives on a clinical study. Epilogue. Psychoanal Inq 7:289-299
37. Renik O (2006). Practical psychoanalysis for therapists and patients. New York, NY: Other Press.
38. Ricoeur P (1977). The question of proof in Freud's psychoanalytic writings. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 25:835-871
39. Rorty R (2000). Pragmatism. Int J Psychoanal 81:819-823
40. Sandler J (1982). Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: The training analyst's dilemma. In: Joseph ED, Wallerstein RS, editors. Psychotherapy. Impact on psychoanalytic training: The influence of practice and theory of psychotherapy on education in psychoanalysis, 39-47. (International Psychoanalytic Association, Monograph 1.) New York, NY: International UP.
41. Sandler J (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int J Psychoanal 64:35-45.
42. Sandler J, Dreher AU (1996). What do psychoanalysts want? The problem of aims in psychoanalytic therapy. London: Routledge.
43. Segal H (2006). Reflections on truth, tradition, and the psychoanalytic tradition of truth. AIM 64:283-292
44. Seitz PFD (1966). The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research. In: Gottschalk LA, Auerbach AH, editors. Method of research in psychotherapy, 209-225 New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
45. Spence D (1982). Narrative and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Norton.
46. Stern DN (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: Norton.
47. Strenger C (1991). Between hermeneutic and sciences: An essay on the epistemology of psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International UP. (Psychological Issues, Monograph 59).
48. Szecsödy I (1990). The learning process in psychotherapy supervision. Stockholm: Karolinska Institut.
49. Thomä H, Jiménez JP, Kächele H (2006). Vergleichende Psychoanalyse - textnahe klinische Forschung (Comparative psychoanalysis: Textual clinical research). In: Thomä H, Kächele H, editors. Psychoanalytische therapie. Forschung, 177-198 Heidelberg: Springer.
50. Thomä H, Kächele H (1987). Psychoanalytic practice. 1. Principles. Heidelberg: Springer.
51. Thomä H, Kächele H (2007). On the basis of a new form of treatment report. Psychoanal Inq 27:650-685
52. Tuckett D (1994a). The conceptualization and communication of clinical facts in psychoanalysis. Foreword. Int J Psychoanal 75:865-870
53. Tuckett D (1994b). Developing a grounded hypothesis to understand a clinical process: The role of conceptualisation in validation. Int J Psychoanal 75:1159-1180
54. Tuckett D (2002). The new style conference and devoloping a peer culture in European psychoanalysis. Presidential Address, Prague. EPF Bulletin 56:2002.
55. Tuckett D (2003). A ten-year European scientific initiative. Presidential Address, EPF Bulletin 57:2003.
56. Tuckett D (2006). The search to define and describe how psychoanalysts work: Preliminary report on the project of the EPF Working Party on Comparative Clinical Methods. In: Canestri J, editor. Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory, 167-200. Chichester: Wiley.
57. Tuckett D (2007). Wie können Fällen in der Psychoanalyse verglichen und diskutiert werden? Implikationen für künftige Standard der klinischen Arbeit [On the problem of comparing and discussing clinical material in psychoanalysis: Implications for future standards of clinical work]. Psyche - Z Psychoanal 61:1042-1071
58. Tuckett D, Basile R, Birksted-Breen D, Böhm T, Denis P, Ferro A, Hinz H, Jernstedt A, Mariotti P, Schubert J (2008). Psychoanalysis comparable and incomparable: The evolution of a method to describe and compare psychoanalytic approaches. London: Routledge.
59. Wampold BE (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.