Comparative psychoanalysis on the basis of a new form of treatment report

Psychoanalytic Inquiry

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 650-689

  Thomä, Helmut ^a,c   Kächele, Horst ^a,b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b Ulm Psychoanalytic Institute

^c NONE   (Germany)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38749120895     PISSN: 07351690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07351690701468322     Document Type: Review

References (150)

1. Alexander, F. (1925), Buchbesprechung S. Ferenczi/O. Rank: Entwicklungsziele der Psychoanalyse (1924). Internat. J. Psychoanal., 11:113-122.
2. _. (1937), Das problem der psychoanalytischen technik. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 23:75-95.
3. Arlow, J. A. (1979), The genesis of interpretation. Amer. J. Psychoanal., 27:193-206.
4. Auchincloss, E. L. & R. Michels. (2003), A reassessment of psychoanalytic education: Controversies and change. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 84:387-403.
5. Balint, M. (1948), On the psycho-analytic training system. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 29:163-173.
6. Barros, E. M. da Rocha (2002), First interview and one session with 'Ana.' Int. J. Psychoanal., 83:569-574.
7. Bartlett, A. B. (2002), Current perspectives on the goals of psychoanalysis. J. Am. Psychoanal., Assoc., 50:629-638.
8. Bernardi, R. (2002), The need for true controversies in psychoanalysis. The debates on Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan in the Rio de la Plata. Int. J. Psychoanal., 83:851-873.
9. Bion, W. (1967), Notes on memory and desire. In: Melanie Klein Today, ed. E. Bott Spillius, New York: Tavistock, 1988, pp. 17-21.
10. Bion, W. R. (2005a), The Italian Seminars. London: Karnac.
11. _ (2005b), The Italian Seminars. London: Karnac.
12. Boesky, D. (2002), Why don't our institutes teach the methodology of clincial psychoanalytical evidence? Psychoanal. Quart., 3:445-475.
13. Bott Spillius, E. (1996), Ziele des psychoanalytischen Prozesses. In: Tagungsband DPV. Peters H. und Rollwagen T. (eds.), p. 65-85.
14. Casement, A. (Ed.). (2004), Who owns psychoanalysis? London: Karnac Books.
15. Caston, J. (1993), Can analysts agree? The problems of consensus and the psychoanalytic mannequin: I. A proposed solution. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41:493-512.
16. _ & E. Martin (1993), Can analysts agree? The problems of consensus and the psychoanalytic mannequin. II. Empirical tests. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 513-548.
17. Caws, P. (2003), Psychoanalysis as the idiosyncratic science of the individual subject. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 20, 618-634.
18. Cohen, R. S. (1983) and Laudan L. Adolf Grünbaum: A Memoire. In: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, eds. Cohen R. S. and Laudan L. IX-XVIII Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Reidel Publishing.
19. Colby, K. M. & R. Stoller. (1988), Cognitive science and psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
20. Alexander, F. (1925), Buchbesprechung S. Ferenczi/O. Rank: Entwicklungsziele der Psychoanalyse (1924). Internat. J. Psychoanal., 11:113-122.
21. _. (1937), Das problem der psychoanalytischen technik. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 23:75-95.
22. Arlow, J. A. (1979), The genesis of interpretation. Amer. J. Psychoanal., 27:193-206.
23. Auchincloss, E. L. & R. Michels. (2003), A reassessment of psychoanalytic education: Controversies and change. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 84:387-403.
24. Balint, M. (1948), On the psycho-analytic training system. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 29:163-173.
25. Barros, E. M. da Rocha (2002), First interview and one session with 'Ana.' Int. J. Psychoanal., 83:569-574.
26. Bartlett, A. B. (2002), Current perspectives on the goals of psychoanalysis. J. Am. Psychoanal., Assoc., 50:629-638.
27. Bernardi, R. (2002), The need for true controversies in psychoanalysis. The debates on Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan in the Rio de la Plata. Int. J. Psychoanal., 83:851-873.
28. Bion, W. (1967), Notes on memory and desire. In: Melanie Klein Today, ed. E. Bott Spillius, New York: Tavistock, 1988, pp. 17-21.
29. Bion, W. R. (2005a), The Italian Seminars. London: Karnac.
30. _ (2005b), The Italian Seminars. London: Karnac.
31. Boesky, D. (2002), Why don't our institutes teach the methodology of clincial psychoanalytical evidence? Psychoanal. Quart., 3:445-475.
32. Bott Spillius, E. (1996), Ziele des psychoanalytischen Prozesses. In: Tagungsband DPV. Peters H. und Rollwagen T. (eds.), p. 65-85.
33. Casement, A. (Ed.). (2004), Who owns psychoanalysis? London: Karnac Books.
34. Caston, J. (1993), Can analysts agree? The problems of consensus and the psychoanalytic mannequin: I. A proposed solution. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41:493-512.
35. _ & E. Martin (1993), Can analysts agree? The problems of consensus and the psychoanalytic mannequin. II. Empirical tests. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 513-548.
36. Caws, P. (2003), Psychoanalysis as the idiosyncratic science of the individual subject. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 20, 618-634.
37. Cohen, R. S. (1983) and Laudan L. Adolf Grünbaum: A Memoire. In: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, eds. Cohen R. S. and Laudan L. IX-XVIII Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Reidel Publishing.
38. Colby, K. M. & R. Stoller. (1988), Cognitive science and psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
39. Cooper, A. (2008), American Psychoanalysis Today. A Pluraltity of Orthodoxies. In print: Journal of the Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychotherapy.
40. Eagle, M. (1984), Recent developments in psychoanalysis. A critical evaluation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Edelson, M. (1988), Psychoanalysis. A theory in crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Eizirik, C. L. (2006), Psychoanalysis as a work in progress. Int. J. Psychoanal., 87:645-650.
43. Etchegoyen, R. H. (1992), The inseparable bond between cure and research in psychoanalysis. Presented at the Congress of the German Analytic Association, May, Ulm, Germany.
44. Ferenczi, S. & O. Rank (1924), Entwicklungsziele der psychoanalyse. Wien: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.
45. Fine, S. & E. Fine (1990), Four psychoanalytic perspectives: A study of differences in imterpretative interventions. J Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:1017-1048.
46. Fonagy, P., et al. (2001), An Open Door Review of Outcome Studies in Psychoanalysis. London: International Psychoanalytic Association.
47. Fosshage, J. L. (1990), Clinical protocol. Psychoanal. Inq., 10:461-477.
48. Freedman, N., Lasky, R., Hurvich, M. (2000), Transformation Cycles as Organizers of Analytic Process. A Method of Sequential Specification. Paper presented at the Scientific Meeting of the Program of Research in Psychoanalysis, IPTAR.
49. Freud (1919a), Lines of advance in psycho-analytic therapy, SE vol. XVII, pp. 157-168.
50. Freud, S. (1905), Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria. Standard Edition, 7. London: Hogarth Press 1953.
51. _. (1912), Recommendations to physicians practising psycho-analysis. Standard Edition, 12. London: Hogarth Press 1957.
52. _. (1916/1917), Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Standard Edition, 16 & 17. London: Hogarth Press 1961, 1963.
53. _. (1922), Publications and prices. Standard Edition, 17. London: Hogarth Press 1959.
54. _. (1927), Postscript to the question of lay analysis. Standard Edition, 20. London: Hogarth Press 1959.
55. Gabbard, G. O. and Westen, D. (2003), Rethinking therapeutic action. Int. J. Psychoanal., 84:823-842.
56. Goffman, E. (1974), Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Aronson: New York.
57. Green, A. (2005), The illusion of common ground and mythical pluralism. Int. J. Psychoanal., 37:86:627-632.
58. Grünbaum, A. (1984), The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
59. _. (1986b), Précis of The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique, and Author's Response to 41 reviewers: Is Freud's theory well founded? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 217-284.
60. _. (1988), A century of psychoanalysis: Critical retrospect and prospect. In M. S. Roth (Ed.), Freud: Conflict and culture (pp. 183-195). New York: Knopf.
61. Cooper, A. (2008), American Psychoanalysis Today. A Pluraltity of Orthodoxies. In print: Journal of the Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychotherapy.
62. Eagle, M. (1984), Recent developments in psychoanalysis. A critical evaluation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
63. Edelson, M. (1988), Psychoanalysis. A theory in crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Eizirik, C. L. (2006), Psychoanalysis as a work in progress. Int. J. Psychoanal., 87:645-650.
65. Etchegoyen, R. H. (1992), The inseparable bond between cure and research in psychoanalysis. Presented at the Congress of the German Analytic Association, May, Ulm, Germany.
66. Ferenczi, S. & O. Rank (1924), Entwicklungsziele der psychoanalyse. Wien: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.
67. Fine, S. & E. Fine (1990), Four psychoanalytic perspectives: A study of differences in imterpretative interventions. J Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:1017-1048.
68. Fonagy, P., et al. (2001), An Open Door Review of Outcome Studies in Psychoanalysis. London: International Psychoanalytic Association.
69. Fosshage, J. L. (1990), Clinical protocol. Psychoanal. Inq., 10:461-477.
70. Freedman, N., Lasky, R., Hurvich, M. (2000), Transformation Cycles as Organizers of Analytic Process. A Method of Sequential Specification. Paper presented at the Scientific Meeting of the Program of Research in Psychoanalysis, IPTAR.
71. Freud (1919a), Lines of advance in psycho-analytic therapy, SE vol. XVII, pp. 157-168.
72. Freud, S. (1905), Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria. Standard Edition, 7. London: Hogarth Press 1953.
73. _. (1912), Recommendations to physicians practising psycho-analysis. Standard Edition, 12. London: Hogarth Press 1957.
74. _. (1916/1917), Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Standard Edition, 16 & 17. London: Hogarth Press 1961, 1963.
75. _. (1922), Publications and prices. Standard Edition, 17. London: Hogarth Press 1959.
76. _. (1927), Postscript to the question of lay analysis. Standard Edition, 20. London: Hogarth Press 1959.
77. Gabbard, G. O. and Westen, D. (2003), Rethinking therapeutic action. Int. J. Psychoanal., 84:823-842.
78. Goffman, E. (1974), Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Aronson: New York.
79. Green, A. (2005), The illusion of common ground and mythical pluralism. Int. J. Psychoanal., 37:86:627-632.
80. Grünbaum, A. (1984), The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
81. _. (1986b), Précis of The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique, and Author's Response to 41 reviewers: Is Freud's theory well founded? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 217-284.
82. _. (1988), A century of psychoanalysis: Critical retrospect and prospect. In M. S. Roth (Ed.), Freud: Conflict and culture (pp. 183-195). New York: Knopf.
83. _. (1988), Die Grundlagen der Psychoanalyse, Stuttgart: Reclam.
84. _. (1993), Validation in the clinical theory of psychoanalysis: A study in the philosophy of psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
85. _. (2006), Is Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic adifice relevant to the 21st century? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23, 257-284.
86. Heimann, P. (1950), On counter-transference. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 31:81-84.
87. Isaacs, S. (1939), Criteria for interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 20, 853-880.
88. Joseph, E. D. (1984), Psychoanalysis: The vital issues. New York: International Universities Press.
89. Jüttemann, G. (ed.) (1990), Komparative Kasuistik. Heidelberg, Germany: Asanger.
90. Kächele, H. & H. Thomä (2000), On the devaluation of the Eitington-Freudmodel of psychoanalytic education [Letter to the editor]. Internat. J. Psychoanal. 81:806-807.
91. Kächele, H., Schachter, J., and Thomä, H. (2008), From Psychoanalytic Narrative to Empirical Single Case Research. In print, New York: Analytic Press.
92. Kernberg, O. (2000), A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. IPA News, 8:33-35.
93. Kernberg, O. (2006), The pressing need to increase research in and on psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 87:919-928.
94. Kernberg, O. (2006), Research anxiety: A response to Roger Perron's comments. Int. J. Psychoanal., 87:933-938.
95. Kernberg (2007), The coming changes in psychoanalytic education: Part II. Int. J. Psychoanal., 88:183-202.
96. Kubie, L. (1958), Research into the process of supervision in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Quart., 27:226-236.
97. Kubie, L. (1974), The drive to become both sexes. Psychol. Issues, 44:191-267.
98. Lichtenstein, H. (1961), Identity and sexuality. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc., 9:179-260.
99. Loewald, H. W. (1960), On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 41:16-33.
100. Luborsky, L. (1967), Momentary forgetting during psychotherapy and psychoanalysis: A theory and a research method. In: Holt RR (ed) Motives and thought: Psychoanalytic essays in honor of David Rapaport. Psychological Issues vol. V Nr. 2-3, Monograph 18/19) Int. Univ. Press: New York, pp. 175-217.
101. Marohn, R. C., ed. (1990), The "Corrective Emotional Experience" Revisited. Psychoanal. Inq., 10:1-10.
102. Meyer, A. E. (1994), Nieder mit der Novelle als Psychoanalysedarstellung - Hoch lebe die Interaktionsgeschichte. Psychosomatische Medizin, 40:77-98.
103. Meyer, A. E. (1998), Freud als Altlast. Psychoanalyseimmanente Hindernisse für die Wissenschaftlichkeit der Psychoanalyse. In: Zwischen Wort und Zahl. Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie als Wissenschaft, F. W. Deneke, ed., Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, pp. 122-144.
104. Mills, J. A. (2007), Response to Grünbaum's refutation of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24:539-544.
105. Mitchell, S. A. (1998), The analyst's knowledge and authority. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 67:1-31.
106. Neudert, L., Grünzig, H. J., & Thomä, H. (1987), Change in self-esteem during psychoanalysis: a single case study. In: Cheshire, N. M., & Thomä, H. (Eds), Self symptoms and psychotherapy. New York Chichester: Wiley & Sons, pp. 243-65.
107. Perron (2001), Response to Peter Fonagy by Roger Perron. In: An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis. Ed Fonagy, P., IPA report, p. 26-28.
108. Perron, R. (2006), How to do research? Reply to Otto Kernberg. Int. J. Psychoanal., 87:927-932.
109. Pulver, S. (1987), Prologue and Epilogue to "How theory shapes technique: Perspectives on a clinical study." Psychoanal. Inq., 7:141-145, 289-299.
110. _. (1993), The eclectic analyst, or the many roads to insight and change. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41:339-357.
111. Ramzy, I. (1974), How the mind of the psychoanalyst works. An essay on psychoanalytic inference. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 55:543-550.
112. Reik, T. (1949), The inner experience of a psychoanalyst. London: Allen & Unwin.
113. Renik, O. (1998), The analyst's subjectivity and the analyst's objectivity. Int. J. Psychoanal., 79:487-489.
114. Richards, A. (1991), The search for common ground: Clinical aims and processes. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 79:487-497.
115. Richards, A. D. & Richards, A. K. (1995), Notes on psychoanalytic theory and it's consequences for technique. J. Clinical Psychoanal., 4:429-456.
116. Ricoeur, P. (1970), Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
117. Rubinstein, B. (1997), Psychoanalysis and the philosophy of science. Ed. R. Holt, Madison: International Universities Press.
118. Rubovits-Seitz, P. F. D. (1992), Interpretive methodology: Some problems, limitations and remedial strategies. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:139-168.
119. Sandler, J. (1982), Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. The training analyst's dilemma. In: Psychotherapy. Impact on psychoanalytic training. The influence of practice and theory of psychotherapy and education in psychoanalysis (Internat. Psychoanal. Assn., monograph series, no. 1), E. D. Joseph, & R. S. Wallerstein, eds. New York: International. University. Press, pp. 39-47.
120. _ & Dreher, A. U. (1996), What do Psychoanalysts want? London: Routledge.
121. _ & Sanler, A. M. (1984), The past unconscious, the present unconscious, and interpretation of the transference. Psychoanal. Inq., 4:367-399.
122. Schafer, R. (1990), The search for common ground. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Assn., 71:49-52.
123. Scarfone, D. (2002), Commentary to first interview and one session with Anna. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 83:575-577.
124. Seitz, P. F. D. (1966), The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research. In: Methods of research in psychotherapy, eds. L. Gottschalk & A. Auerbach. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 209-225.
125. Shakow, D. (1960), The: recorded psychoanalytic interview as an objective approach to research in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 29:82-97.
126. Spence, D. P. (1986), When interpretation masquerades as explanation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 34:3-22.
127. Stegmüller, W. (1969), Probleme und resultate der wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen philosophie. Bd. 1: Wissenschaftliche erklärung und begründung. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
128. Stoller, R. (1968), Sex and gender. Vol. 1: On the development of masculinity and femininity. Vol 2: The transsexual experiment. London: Hogarth.
129. _. (1979), Sexual excitement. New York: Pantheon.
130. Streeck, U. (1986), Hintergrundannahmen im psychoanalytischen behandlungsprozeß. Forum Psychoanal., 2:98-110.
131. _. (1995), Private Theorien zum psychoanalytischen Handwerk. In: Subjektivität in der psychoanalyse, W. Tress & C. Sies, eds. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 29-47.
132. _ & J. Streeck (2002), Mikroanalyse sprachlichen und körperlichen Interaktionsverhaltens in psychotherapeutischen beziehungen. Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaft, 1:61-78.
133. Strenger, C. (1991), Between hermeneutics and science. An essay on the epistemology of psychoanalysis. Madison: International Universities Press.
134. Thomä, H. (1967), Konversionshysterie und weiblicher Kastrationskomplex. Psyche-Z Psychoanal., 21:827-847.
135. Thomä, H. (1993), Training analysis and psychoanalytic education: Proposals for reform. Ann. Psychoanal., 21:3-75.
136. Thomä, H., Houben, A. (1967), Über die Validierung psychoanalytischer Theorien durch die Untersuchupg von Deutungsaktionen. Psyche-Z Psychoanal., 21:664-692.
137. Thomä, H., Grünzig, H., Böckenförde, H., Kächele, H. (1976), Das Konsensusproblem in der Psychoanalyse. Psyche 30:978-1027.
138. Thomä, H., & Kächele, H. (1975), Problems of metascience and methodology in clinical psychoanalytic research. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 3, 49-119.
139. _ & Kächele, H. (1987), Psychoanalytic practice. Vol. 1: Principles. Vol. 2: Clinical studies (English ed.). New York: Springer, p. 1992.
140. _ & Kächele, H. (1992), Psychoanalytic Practice. Vol. 2: Springer: New York.
141. _ & Kächele, H. (1999), Memorandum on a reform of psychoanalytic education. IPA News, 8:33-35.
142. _ & Kächele, H. (2000), On the devaluation of the Eitingon-Freud model of psychoanalytic education. Letters to the editor. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 806-8.
143. Tuckett, D. (1994), The conceptualization and communication of clinical facts in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 865-70.
144. von Mises, R. (1990), Kleines lehrbuch des Positivismus. Germany: Suhrkamp.
145. von Wright, G. H. (1994), Normen, Werte und Handlungen. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
146. Waelder, R. (1962), Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 10:617-637.
147. Wallerstein, R. S. (1988), One psychoanalysis or many? Internat. J. Psychoanal., 69:5-21.
148. _ (1990), Psychoanalysis: the common ground. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 71:3-20.
149. _ (2002), The trajectory of psychoanalysis: A prognostication. Internat. J. Psychoanal., 83:1247-1267.
150. _ (2003), Psychoanalytic therapy research: Its coming of age. Psychoanal. Inq., 23:375-404.