Theoretical plurality and pluralism in psychoanalytic practice

International Journal of Psychoanalysis

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 579-599

  Jiménez, Juan Pablo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Pluralism; Psychoanalysis as craftmanship; Psychoanalyst's mind; Psychoanalytic practice; Psychoanalytic theory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COUNTER TRANSFERENCE; DEPRESSION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMOTIONALITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LIFE EVENT; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TRANSFERENCE;

ADULT; BEREAVEMENT; COMMUNICATION; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; DREAMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC INTERPRETATION; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 46249129094     PISSN: 00207578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00059.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arlow JA, Brenner C (1988). The future of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Q 70:3-28.
2. Beebe B, Lachmann FM (2002). Infant research and adult treatment: Co-constructing interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
3. Bernardi R (1989). The role of paradigmatic determinants in psychoanalytic understanding. Int J Psychoanal 70:341-57.
4. Bernardi R (2002). The need for true controversies in psychoanalysis: The debates on Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan in the Río de la Plata. Int J Psychoanal 83:851-73.
5. Bernardi R (2003). What kind of evidence makes the analyst change his or her theoretical and technical ideas? In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis, 125-36. London: IPA.
6. Bernardi R (2005). What after pluralism? Ulysses still on the road Psychoanal Inq 25:654-66.
7. Bowlby J (1969). Attachment and loss, vol. 1. Attachment. London: Hogarth.
8. Canestri J (1994). Transformations. Int J Psychoanal 75:1079-92.
9. Canestri J (2006). Implicit understanding of clinical material beyond theory. in: Canestri J, editor. Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory. New York, NY: Wiley, chapter 1, 13-28.
10. Canestri J, Bohleber W, Denis P, Fonagy P (2006). The map of private (implicit, preconscious) theories in clinical practice. in: Canestri J, editor. Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory. New York, NY: Wiley, chapter 2, 29-44.
11. Cavell M (1993). The psychoanalytic mind: From Freud to philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
12. Cavell M (1998). Triangulation, one's own mind and objectivity. Int J Psychoanal 79:449-67.
13. Falzeder E, Brabant E, editors (2000). The correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi. vol. 3, 1920-33, Hoffer PT, translator. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
14. Ferenczi S (1928). The elasticity of psycho-analytical technique. In: Balint M, editor. Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis, 87-101. London: Hogarth, 1955.
15. Ferrater Mora J (1969). Diccionario de filosofía [Dictionary of philosophy]. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.
16. Fonagy P, Kächele H, Krause R, Jones E, Perron R (1999). An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis: Report prepared by the Research Committee of the IPA at the request of the President. London: University College.
17. Freud S (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psychoanalysis. SE 12, 109-20.
18. Freud S (1927). Postscript to the question of lay analysis. SE 20, 251-8.
19. Gabbard GO (1990). Psychodynamic psychiatry in clinical practice. 3rd edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric, 2000.
20. Greenson R (1960). Empathy and its vicissitudes. Int J Psychoanal 41:418-24.
21. Hamilton V (1996). The analyst's preconscious. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
22. Hanly C (1990). The concept of truth in psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal 71:375-83.
23. Heimann P (1977). Further observations on the analyst's cognitive process. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 25:313-33.
24. Holt RR (1964). The emergence of cognitive psychology. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 12:650-65.
25. Infante JA (1968). Algunas reflexiones acerca de la relación analítica [Some reflections on the analytic relationship]. Rev Psicoanal 25:767-75.
26. Jiménez JP (2006). After pluralism: A new integrated psychoanalytic paradigm. Int J Psychoanal 87:1487-507.
27. Jordán JF (2004). Commonsense and nonsense in psychoanalytic practice. Presented at the 43rd IPA Congress, New Orleans.
28. Kächele H, Albani C, Buchheim A, Grünzig H-J, Hölzer M, Hohage R, et al. (2006). The German specimen case, Amalia X Empirical studies. Int J Psychoanal 87:809-26.
29. Kächele H, Schachter J, Thomä H, The Ulm Psychoanalytic Process Research Study Group (in press). From psychoanalytic narrative to empirical single case research. Implications for psychoanalytic practice.
30. Kvale S (1995). The social construction of validity. Qual Inq 1:19-40.
31. Meyer AE (1988). What makes psychoanalysts tick? A model and a method of audio-recorded retroreports. In: Dahl H, Kächele H, Thomä H, editors. Psychoanalytic process research strategies, 273-90. Berlin: Springer.
32. Peterfreund E (1975). How does the analyst listen? On models and strategies in the psychoanalytic process Psychoanal Contemp Sci 4:59-101.
33. Pulver SE (1987a). How theory shapes technique: Perspectives on a clinical study. Prologue. Psychoanal Inq 7:141-5.
34. Pulver SE (1987b). How theory shapes technique: Perspectives on a clinical study. Epilogue. Psychoanal Inq 7:289-99.
35. Ramzy I (1974). How the mind of the psychoanalyst works: An essay on psychoanalytic inference. Int J Psychoanal 55:543-50.
36. Ricoeur P (1977). The question of proof in Freud's psychoanalytic writings. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 25:835-71.
37. Rorty R (2000). Pragmatism. Int J Psychoanal 81:819-23.
38. Rubovits-Seitz PFD (1992). Interpretive methodology: Some problems, limitations, and remedial strategies. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 40:139-68.
39. Sandler J (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int J Psychoanal 64:35-45.
40. Sandler J, Dreher AU (1996). What do psychoanalysts want? The problem of aims in psychoanalytic therapy. London: Routledge.
41. Silvan M (2005). Do we do what we think we do? Implicit theories in the analyst's mind J Am Psychoanal Assoc 53:945-56.
42. Spence D (1982). Narrative and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Norton.
43. Stein S (1991). The influence of theory on the psychoanalyst's countertransference. Int J Psychoanal 72:325-34.
44. Strenger C (1991). Between hermeneutics and science: An essay on the epistemology of psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International UP. ( Psychological Issues, Monograph 59.)
45. Thomä H, Kächele H (2006). Psychoanalytische Therapie. Forschung. [Psychoanalytic therapy. Research]. Heidelberg: Springer.
46. Tuckett D (1994a). The conceptualisation and communication of clinical facts in psychoanalysis. Foreword. Int J Psychoanal 75:865-70.
47. Tuckett D (1994b). Developing a grounded hypothesis to understand a clinical process: The role of conceptualisation in validation. Int J Psychoanal 75:1159-80.
48. Wallace RJ (2003). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter 2003 edn). Zalta EN, editor [accessed 2008 January 281. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2003/entries/practical-reason/.
49. Wallerstein RS (1988). One psychoanalysis or many? Int J Psychoanal 69:5-21.
50. Wallerstein RS (1990). Psychoanalysis: The common ground. Int J Psychoanal 71:3-20.