Exploring how factors impact the activities and participation of persons with disability: Constructing a model through grounded theory

Qualitative Report

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 165-200

  Wee, Joy ^a   Paterson, Margo ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b School of Rehabilation Therapy   (Canada)

Author keywords

And grounded theory; Disabiliy; ICF activities and participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 66549130455     PISSN: 10520147     EISSN: 21603715     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
2. Bontje, P., Kinebanian, A., Josephsson, S., & Tamura, Y. (2004). Occupational adaptation: The experiences of older persons with physical disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(2), 140-149.
3. Boschen, K. A. (1994). Variables affecting independent living for persons with physical disabilities. Toronto, ON: Funded by National Welfare Grants Program, Human Resources Development Canada.
4. Boschen, K. A., & Gargaro, J. (1998). Independent living long-term outcome variables in spinal cord injury: A replication of DeJong. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21, 285-300.
5. Boschen, K., Tonack, M., & Gargaro, J. (2003). Long-term adjustment and community reintegration following spinal cord injury. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 26(3), 157-164.
6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
7. Canadian Business Online. (2007). Canada's best places to retire. Canada Business Online. Your success is our business. Retrieved from www.canadianbusiness.com/slideshow/retirement.cities/retire1.html
8. Christiansen, C. H., & Baum, C. M. (Eds.). (1997). Occupational therapy. Enabling function and well-being (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
9. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Davidson, H. (1991). Performance and the social environment. In C. Christiansen & C. Baum (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Overcoming human performance deficits (pp. 143-177). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
11. DeJong, G., & Hughes, J. (1982). Independent living: Methodology for measuring longterm outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 63, 68-73.
12. Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13. Dijkers, M. (1997). Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A meta analysis of the effects of disablement components. Spinal Cord, 35, 829-840.
14. Dijkers, M. (1998). Community integration: Conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 4(1), 1-15.
15. Dunn, P. A. (1990). The impact of the housing environment upon the ability of disabled people to live independently. Disability, Handicap, and Society, 5(1), 37-52.
16. Dyck, I. (1995). Hidden geographies: The changing lifeworlds of women with multiple sclerosis. Social Science Medicine, 40(3), 307-320.
17. Fearing, V. G., Law, M., & Clark, M. (1997). An occupational performance process model: Fostering client and therapist alliances. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 7-15.
18. Flanagan, J. C. (1982). Measurement of quality of life: Current state of the art. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 63, 56-59.
19. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychometric Research, 12(3), 189-198.
20. Fougeyrollas, P., Noreau, L., Bergeron, H., Cloutier, R., Dion, S. A., & St. Michel, G. (1998). Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: Conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21, 127-141.
21. Fougeyrollas, P., Noreau, L., & Boschen, K. A. (2002). Interaction of environment with individual characteristics and social participation: Theoretical perspectives and applications in persons with spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 7(3), 1-16.
22. Gandek, B., Sinclair, S. J., Jette, A. M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2007). Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC). American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86(1), 57-71.
23. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociological Press.
24. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
25. Glaser, B. G. (Ed.). (1993). Examples of grounded theory: A reader. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
26. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
27. Hancock, T. (1993). Health, human development and the community ecosystem: Three ecological models. Health Promotion International, 8, 41-47.
28. House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Jackson, J. P., & Schkade, J. K. (2001). Occupational adaptation model versus biomechanical-rehabilitation model in the treatment of patients with hip fractures. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(1), 531-533.
30. Jette, A., Haley, S., & Kooyoomjian, J. (2003). Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35, 145-149.
31. Jones, N. L. (1991). Essential requirements of the act: A short history and overview. In J. West (Ed.), The Americans with Disabilities Act: From policy to practice (pp. 25-54). New York: Milbank Memorial Fund.
32. Law, M., Cooper, B. A., Strong, S., Stewart, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9-23.
33. Law, M., Cooper, B. A., Strong, S., Stewart, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1997). Theoretical contexts for the practice of occupational therapy. In C. H. Christiansen & C. M. Baum (Eds.), Occupational therapy. Enabling function and well-Being (2nd ed., pp. 77-102). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
34. Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
35. McColl, M. A., & Skinner, H. (1995). Assessing inter-and intrapersonal resources: Social support and coping among adults with a disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17(1), 24-34.
36. Minkler, M., Fuller-Thomson, E., & Gurainik, J. M. (2006). Gradient of disability across the socioeconomic spectrum in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355(7), 695-705.
37. National League for Nursing, Interdisciplinary Health Education Panel. (1998). Building community: Developing skills for interprofessional health professions education and relationship-centered care. Nursing and Health Care Perspectives, 19(2), 86-90.
38. Noreau, L., Fougeyrollas, P., & Boschen, K. A. (2002). Perceived influence of the environment on social participation among individuals with spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 7(3), 56-72.
39. Nosek, M. A., & Fuhrer, M. J. (1992). Independence among people with disabilities: I.A. heuristic model. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 36(1), 6-24.
40. Reid, D., Angus, J., McKeever, P., & Miller, K-L. (2003). Home is where their wheels are: Experiences of women wheelchair users. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(2), 186-195.
41. Rock, P. J. (1988). Independence: What it means to six disabled people living in the community. Disability, Handicap, and Society, 3, 27-35.
42. Service Canada. (2007). Persons with disabilities online. Retrieved from http://www.pwd-online.ca/ pwdlist.jsp?&lang=en&fontsize=0&cat=8
43. Statistics Canada. (2006). The Daily. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/061220/d061220b.htm
44. Steinberg, A. G., Iezzoni, L. I., Conill, A., & Stineman, M. (2002). Reasonable accommodations for medical faculty with disabilities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(24), 3147-3154.
45. Stensman, R. (1994). Adjustment to traumatic spinal cord injury: A longitudinal study of self-reported quality of life. Paraplegia, 32, 416-422.
46. The Government of Canada. (1982). The Canadian charter of rights and freedoms. Retrieved from http://www.efc.ca/pages/law/charter/ charter.text.html
47. The Government of Ontario. (2001). The Ontarians with Disabilities Act. Retrieved from http://www.queensu.ca/equity/disabilities/ legal.php#The_Ontarians_with_Disabilities_Act
48. The Government of Ontario, Ministry of community, and social services. (2005). Accessibility for Ontarians with Disability Act. Retrieved from http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/mcss/english/pillars/accessibilityOntario/ what/AODA_2005
49. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. (2006). Accessibility standard for real property. Retrieved from http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ pubs_pol/dcgpubs/aas-gasa/asrpnafbi/asrp-nafbi01_e.asp#_Toc137456038
50. U.S. Department of Justice. (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Retrieved from http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/pubs/ada.htm
51. van Brakel, W. H., Anderson, A. M., Mutatkar, R. K., Bakirtzief, Z., Nicholls, P. G., Raju, M. S., et al. (2006). The participation scale: Measuring a key concept in public health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(4), 193-203.
52. Voorman, J. M., & Dallmeijer, A. J. (2006). Activities and participation of 9 to 13 year old children with cerebral palsy. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20, 937-948.
53. Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547-559.
54. Wee, J. (2006, October). The social dimensions of human disability across global settings [peer reviewed abstract]. Proceedings of the CCIH/CCGHR 13th Canadian Conference on International Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
55. Wee, J., & Schwarz, R. (2004). An international comparative study assessing impairment, activities, and participation in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. A pilot study. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 15(2), 43-53
56. Whiteneck, G. G. (1996). Evaluating outcome after spinal cord injury: What determines success? The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 120(2), 179-185.
57. Whiteneck, G., Tate, D., & Charlifue, S. (1999). Predicting community reintegration after spinal cord injury from demographic and injury characteristics. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80, 1485-1491.
58. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.