How do designers represent to themselves the users' needs?

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 757-764

  Darses, Françoise ^a   Wolff, Marion ^b  

^a Bioinformatique et Chimie Moléculaire   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Cooperative design; Project management; User centred design

Indexed keywords

CASTING; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; CUTTING TOOLS; ERGONOMICS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

CARBODY; COOPERATIVE DESIGN; USER-CENTRED DESIGN;

MACHINE DESIGN;

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; ERGONOMICS; MACHINE; METHODOLOGY;

EID: 33745876858     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bernard, J.M., 2003. Analysis of local or asymmetric dependencies in contingency tables using the Imprecise Dirichlet Model. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and their Applications: ISIPTA'03, July 14-17, Switzerland, Lugano, pp. 46-61.
2. Brandt, E., Messeter, J., 2004. Facilitating collaboration through design games. Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference, Toronto, Canada, pp. 121-131.
3. Butters L.M., and Dixon R.T. Ergonomics in consumer product evaluation: an evolving process. Appl. Ergon. 29 1 (1998) 55-58
4. Cahour B. Décalages socio-cognitifs en réunion de conception participative. Le Travail Humain 65 4 (2002) 315-337
5. Carroll J.M. Making Use. Scenario-based Design of Human-Computer Interactions (2000), The MIT Press, Cambridge
6. Clement A., and Van den Besselaar P. A retrospective look at PD projects. Commun. ACM 36 4 (1993) 29-37
7. Clement, A., Van den Besselaar, P., 2004. Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices. Proceedings of PDC, Eighth Participatory Design Conference, July 27-31, Toronto, Canada.
8. Damodoran L. User involvement in the system design process-a practical guide for users. Behav. Inf. Technol. 15 6 (1996) 363-377
9. Darses F. Providing ergonomists with techniques for cognitive work analysis. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 2 3 (2001) 268-277
10. Darses, F., 2003. What representations do designers build of the future users of their design? In: Folkeson, A., Gralen, K., Norell, M., Sellgren, U. (Eds.), Research for practice-innovation in products, processes and organisations. Proceedings of ICED 03, International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, August 19-21, 2003. The Design Society, Linköping, Sweden.
11. Darses, F., Cahour, B., Poveda, O., André-Thorin, F. Delabie, J.B., Pêcheux, V., 2001. Quelles conditions pour la participation des opérateurs a la conception de leurs dispositifs de fabrication? In: Proceedings of the International Conference SELF-ACE, Montréal, Canada, October 3-5, 2001.
12. Feyen R., Liu Y., Chaffin D., Jimmerson G., and Joseph B. Computer-aided ergonomics: a case study of incorporating ergonomics analyses into workplace design. Appl. Ergon. 31 3-1 (2000) 291-300
13. Folkeson, A., Gralen, K., Norell, M., Sellgren, U., 2003. Research for practice-innovation in products, processes and organisations. In: Proceedings of ICED 03, International Conference on Engineering Design, August 19-21, Stockholm. The Design Society, Linköping, Sweden, 701pp., plus CDRom.
14. Fulton Suri J., and Marsh M. Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Appl. Ergon. 31 2-3 (2000) 151-157
15. In: Greenbaum J., and Kyng M. (Eds). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems (1991), Lawrence Erlbaum, Chichester, UK
16. Hays W.L. Statistics. fifth ed (1994), Harcourt College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX
17. Heller F., Pusic E., Strauss G., and Wilpert B. Organizational Participation: Myth and Reality (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford
18. Hollnagel, E., Niwa, Y., 1999. The collaboration between operators and procedures: a cognitive systems engineering approach to performance improvement. Hum. Comput. Interact. (2), 1211-1215.
19. Johansson Hanse J., and Forsman M. Identification and analysis of unsatisfactory psychosocial work situations: a participatory approach employing video-computer interaction. Appl. Ergon. 32 1 (2001) 23-29
20. Kensing F., and Blomberg J. Participatory design: issues and concerns. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 7 (1998) 167-185
21. Le Roux B., and Rouanet H. Geometric Data Analysis: From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis (2004), Kluwer, Bruxelles
22. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., 1995. Engineering Design. A Systematic Approach (Wallace, K.M., Blessing, L., Bauert, F., Trans. 2nd, enlarged and updated ed.; orig. ed. 1977). Springer, London.
23. Poveda O., Brissaud D., and Garro O. A tool for tile design process technical control. In: Gogu G., Coutellier D., Chedmail P., and Ray P. (Eds). Recent Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam 483-492
24. In: Schraagen J.M., Chipman S.F., and Shalin V.L. (Eds). Cognitive Task Analysis (2000), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
25. Vicente K. Cognitive Work Analysis (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ
26. Visser, W., Wolff, M., 2003. A cognitive approach to spatial discourse production. Combining manual and automatic analyses of route descriptions. Proceedings of European Science Conference 2003: EuroCognSci03, September, Osnabrück, Germany, pp. 355-360.
27. Wolff M. Apports de l'analyse géométrique des données pour l'analyse de l'activité. In: Sperandio J.-C., and Wolff M. (Eds). Formalismes de modélisation pour l'analyse du travail et l'ergonomie (2003), PUF, Paris 195-227