Hegemonic and other masculinities in local social contexts

Men and Masculinities

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 387-423

  Lusher, Dean ^a   Robins, Garry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Hegemonic masculinity; Interdependency; Masculinities; Social network theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 66349120482     PISSN: 1097184X     EISSN: 15526828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1097184X06298776     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abbott, A. 1997. Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces 75 (4). 1149-82.
2. Barnes, J.A. 1954. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations 7: 39-58.
3. Bird, S.R. 1996. Welcome to the men's club-Homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender & Society 10 (2). 120-32.
4. Brittan, A. 1989. Masculinity and power. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
5. Carlson, N.R., and W. Buskist. 1997. Psychology: The science of behaviour. 5 th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Carrigan, T., R.W. Connell, and J. Lee. 1985. Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society 14 (5). 551-604.
7. Cartwright, D., and F. Harary. 1956. Structural balance-A generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review 63 (5). 277-93.
8. Collier, R. 1998. Masculinities, crime and criminology: Men, heterosexuality and the criminal(ised) other. London: Sage.
9. Connell, R.W. 1987. Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
10. -. 1995. Masculinities. St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
11. -. 1998. Masculinities and globalization. Men and Masculinities 1 (1). 3-23.
12. -. 2000. The men and the boys. St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
13. -. 2001. Special issue: Men and masculinities: Discursive approaches - Introduction and overview. Feminism & Psychology 11 (1). 5-9.
14. -. 2002 a. Gender. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
15. -. 2002 b. On hegemonic masculinity and violence: Response to Jefferson and Hall. Theoretical Criminology 6 (1). 89-99.
16. -. 2003. Masculinities, change, and conflict in global society: Thinking about the future of men's studies. Journal of Men's Studies 11 (3). 249-66.
17. -. 2004. Encounters with structure. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 17 (1). 10-27.
18. Connell, R.W., and J.W. Messerschmidt. 2005. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society 19 (6). 829-59.
19. Contractor, N.S., S. Wasserman, and K. Faust. 2006. Testing multi-theoretical multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. The Academy of Management Review 31 (3). 681-703.
20. "culture". 2004. In Oxford reference online, edited by C. Soanes and A. Stevenson. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Davies, B. 1993. Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
22. Demetriou, D.Z. 2001. Connell's concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique. Theory and Society 30 (3). 337-61.
23. Donaldson, M. 1993. What is hegemonic masculinity ? Theory and Society 22 (5). 643-57.
24. Emirbayer, M., and J. Goodwin. 1994. Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology 99 (6). 1411-54.
25. Festinger, L. 1957. Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26. Frank, O., and D. Strauss. 1986. Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (395). 832-42.
27. Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, edited and translated by Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
28. Hall, S. 2002. Daubing the drudges of fury: Men, violence and the piety of the "hegemonic masculinity" thesis. Theoretical Criminology 6 (1). 35-61.
29. Hearn, J. 2004. From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory 5 (1). 49-72.
30. Heider, F. 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
31. Hogg, M.A. 2001. A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 (3). 184-200.
32. Hogg, M.A., and S.C. Hains. 1998. Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psychology 28: 323-41.
33. Hogg, M.A., D.J. Terry, and K.M. White. 1995. A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 58 (4). 255-69.
34. Hornsey, M.J., and M.A. Hogg. 2002. The effects of status on subgroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology 41: 203-18.
35. Howson, R. 2005. Challenging hegemonic masculinity. London: Routledge.
36. Jefferson, T. 2002. Subordinating hegemonic masculinity. Theoretical Criminology 6 (1). 63-88.
37. Kenway, J., and L. Fitzclarence. 1997. Masculinity, violence and schooling: Challenging 'poisonous pedagogies. ' Gender and Education 9 (1). 117-33.
38. Kessler, S., D.J. Ashenden, R.W. Connell, and G.W. Dowsett. 1985. Gender relations in secondary schooling. Sociology of Education 58 (1). 34-48.
39. Kilduff, M. 2001. Hegemonic masculinity and organizational behavior. In Handbook of organizational behavior, 2 nd ed., rev. ed., and exp. ed., edited by R. T. Golembiewski, 599-609. New York: Marcel Dekker.
40. Kilduff, M., and A. Mehra. 1996. Hegemonic masculinity among the elite: Power, identity, and homophily in social networks. In Masculinities in organizations. Research on men and masculinities series, Vol. 9, edited by C. Cheng, 115-29. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Kupers, T.A. 2005. Toxic masculinity as a barrier to mental health treatment in prison. Journal of Clinical Psychology 61 (6). 713-24.
42. Lindenberg, S. 1997. Grounding groups in theory: Functional, cognitive, and structural interdependencies. Advances in Group Process 14: 281-331.
43. Lusher, D., and G. Robins. in preparation. A social network analysis of hegemonic and other masculinities.
44. Lusher, D., G. Robins, and P. Dudgeon. in preparation. The Masculine Attitudes Index (MAI): A measurement of male dominance beliefs.
45. Lyons, A., and Y. Kashima. 2003. How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (6). 989-1005. (Pubitemid 38023931)
46. Mahalik, J.R., B.D. Locke, L.H. Ludlow, M.A. Diemer, R.P.J. Scott, M. Gottfried, et al. 2003. Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 4 (1). 3-25.
47. Marecek, J., M. Crawford, and D. Popp. 2004. On the construction of gender, sex, and sexualities. In The psychology of gender, 2 nd ed., edited by A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, and R. J. Sternberg, pp. 192-216. New York: Guilford.
48. McGarty, C., J.C. Turner, M.A. Hogg, B. David, and M.S. Wetherell. 1992. Group polarization as conformity to the prototypical group member. British Journal of Social Psychology 31: 1-20.
49. Monge, P.R., and N.S. Contractor. 2003. Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Mumby, D.K. 1997. The problem of hegemony: Rereading Gramsci for organizational communication studies. Western Journal of Communication 61 (4). 343-75.
51. Pattison, P., and S. Wasserman. 1999. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology 52: 169-93.
52. Pringle, R. 2005. Masculinities, sport, and power-A critical comparison of Gramscian and Foucauldian inspired theoretical tools. Journal of Sport & Social Issues 29 (3). 256-78.
53. Ridgeway, C.L., and S.J. Correll. 2004. Unpacking the gender system-A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society 18 (4). 510-31.
54. Robins, G., P. Elliott, and P. Pattison. 2001. Network models for social selection processes. Social Networks 23 (1). 1-30. (Pubitemid 33668972)
55. Robins, G., P. Pattison, and P. Elliott. 2001. Network models for social influence processes. Psychometrika 66 (2). 161-89.
56. Robins, G., P. Pattison, Y. Kalish, and D. Lusher. in press. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks.
57. Robins, G., P. Pattison, and S. Wasserman. 1999. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: III. Valued relations. Psychometrika 64 (3). 371-94.
58. Sherif, M., O.J. Harvey, B.J. White, W.R. Hood, and C.W. Sherif. 1988. The robbers cave experiment: Intergroup conflict and cooperation. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
59. Sidanius, J., and F. Pratto. 1999. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60. Simmel, G. 1950. The sociology of Georg Simmel, edited by K. H. Wolff. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
61. Snijders, T.A.B., P. Pattison, G. Robins, and M. Handcock. 2006. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology.
62. Speer, S.A. 2001 a. Participants' orientations, ideology and the ontological status of hegemonic masculinity: A rejoinder to Nigel Edley. Feminism & Psychology 11 (1). 141-44.
63. -. 2001 b. Reconsidering the concept of hegemonic masculinity: Discursive psychology, conversation analysis and participants' orientations. Feminism & Psychology 11 (1). 107-35.
64. Tajfel, H., and J.C. Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations, edited by W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, 33-47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
65. Turner, J.C. 1999. Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In Social identity: Context, commitment, content, edited by N. Ellemers, R. Spears, and B. Doosje, 6-34. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
66. Turner, J.C., M.A. Hogg, P.J. Oakes, S.D. Reicher, and M.S. Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
67. Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68. Wasserman, S., and P. Pattison. 1996. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks.1. An introduction to Markov graphs and p. Psychometrika 61 (3). 401-25.
69. Wetherell, M., and N. Edley. 1999. Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology 9 (3). 335-56.
70. Whitehead, S.M. 1999. Hegemonic masculinity revisited. Gender, Work & Organization 6 (1). 58-62.
71. -. 2002. Men and masculinities: Key themes and new directions. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.