The effects of status on subgroup relations

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 203-218

  Hornsey, Matthew J ^a   Hogg, Michael A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036596036     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466602760060200     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Berry, J. W. (1991). Understanding and managing multiculturalism: Some possible implications of research in Canada. Pyschology and Developing Societies, 3, 17-49.
2. Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., Mielke, R., & Klink, A. (1998). Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 697-729.
3. Bourhis, R. Y., & Hill, P. (1982). Intergroup perceptions in British higher education: A field study. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 423-468). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Validzic, A. (1998). Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation, and a common ingroup identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 109-120.
5. Eggins, R., & Haslam, S. A. (1998). Social identity and social conflict: When is re-categorisation effective in negotiation? Unpublished manuscript, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.
6. Ellemers, N., van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
7. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Murrell, A. J., & Pomare, M. (1990). How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 692-704.
8. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25, 224-249.
9. Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A., & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1099.
10. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
11. Hewstone, M. (1996). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 323-368). London: Guilford.
12. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Hogg, M. A. & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
14. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subgroup differentiation as a response to an overly-inclusive group: A test of optimal distinctiveness theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 543-550.
15. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000a). Subgroup relations: A comparison of the mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256.
16. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000b). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
17. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000c). Intergroup similarity and subgroup relations: Some implications for assimilation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 948-958.
18. Mlicki, P. P., & Ellemers, N. (1996). Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 97-114.
19. Moghaddam, F. M., & Solliday, E. A. (1991). 'Balanced multiculturalism' and the challenge of peaceful coexistence in pluralistic societies. Psychology and Developing Societies, 3, 51-71.
20. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122
21. Mummendey, A., Klink, A., Mielke, R., Wenzel, M., & Blanz, M. (1999). Sociostructural characteristics of intergroup relations and identity mangement strategies: Results from a field study in East-Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 259-285.
22. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
23. Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Reid, S., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). When the group is deplorable but diagnostic. Unpublished manuscript, University of Queensland.
25. Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 64-80.
26. Sears, D. O., Citrin, J., Cheleden, S. V., & Van Laar, C. (1999). Cultural diversity and multicultural politics: Is ethnic Balkanization psychologically inevitable. In D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller, (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 35-79). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An intergrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
28. Terry, D. J., & Callan, V. J. (1998). In-group bias in response to an organizational merger. Group Dynamics, 2, 67-81.
29. Terry, D. J., Carey, C. J. & Callan, V. J. (2001). Employee adjustment to an organizational merger: An intergroup perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 267-280.
30. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances of group processes. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
31. Turner, J. C. (1990). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
33. Van Knippenberg, A. F. M. (1984). Intergroup differences in group perceptions. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (pp. 560-578). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Van Leeuwen, E., (2001). Preserving identity when groups combine: A study of group-based reactions to mergers. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
35. Wagner, U., & Schonbach, P. (1984). Links between educational status and prejudice: Ethnic attitudes in West Germany. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.). Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 29-52). New York: Academic Press.
36. Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271.