Effect of surface roughness, porosity, and a resorbable calcium phosphate coating on osseointegration of titanium in a minipig model

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 667-678

  Schwarz, Markus L R ^a   Kowarsch, Markus ^a   Rose, Steffen ^a   Becker, Kristianna ^b   Lenz, Tamara ^b   Jani, Lutz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Histomorphometry; Minipig; Osseointegration; Pull out tests; Resorbable coating; Titanium implants

Indexed keywords

HISTOMORPHOMETRY; MINIPIG; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PULL-OUT TESTS; RESORBABLE COATING; TITANIUM IMPLANTS;

ANCHORAGES (FOUNDATIONS); CALCIUM; CALCIUM ALLOYS; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; PHOSPHATE COATINGS; PHOSPHATES; PLASMA SPRAYING; PROTECTIVE COATINGS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TESTING; TITANIUM;

BONE;

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE DIBASIC; TITANIUM;

ABRASIVE BLASTING; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; GLASSPEARLBLASTING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMPLANT; MINIPIG; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TECHNIQUE; TITANIUM PLASMA SPRAYING;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; FEMUR; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MODELS, ANIMAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POROSITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SWINE; SWINE, MINIATURE; TITANIUM;

EID: 66249084534     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32000     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC, Kent GM. The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth. Clin Orthop 1980;149:291-298.
2. Brett PM, Harle J, Salih V, Mihoc R, Olsen I, Jones FH, Tonetti M. Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone 2004;35:124-133.
3. Emgartner C, Volkmann R, Winter E, Maurer F, Sauer G, Weller S, Weise K. Results of an uncemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis after 9 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15:440-447.
4. Hartwig CH, Rehak L, Milz S, Benner KU, Kusswetter W, Willmann G. Osseointegration of titanium test bodies of different surface properties in metaphyseal bone sites of the dog-A biomechanical and histological analysis. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1995;40:99-105.
5. Markel DC, Hora N, Grimm M. Press-fit stability of uncemented hemispheric acetabular components: a comparison of three porous coating systems. Int Orthop 2002;26:72-75.
6. Soballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Pedersen CM, Bunger C. Hydroxyapatite coating enhances fixation of porous coated implants. A comparison in dogs between press fit and noninterference fit. Acta Orthop Scand 1990;61:299- 306.
7. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1567-1575.
8. Delaunay CP, Kapandji AI. Survivorship of rough-surfaced threaded acetabular cups. 382 consecutive primary Zweymul- ler cups followed for 0.2-12 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69:379-383.
9. Geesink RG. Osteoinductive coatings for total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2002;395:53-65.
10. Soballe K, Overgaard S, Hansen ES, Brokstedt-Rasmussen H, Lind M, Bunger C. A review of ceramic coatings for implant fixation. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 1999;9:131-51.
11. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
12. Soballe K. Hydroxyapatite ceramic coating for bone implant fixation. Mechanical and histological studies in dogs. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1993;255:1-58.
13. Lu HH, Pollack SR, Ducheyne P. Temporal zeta potential variations of 45S5 bioactive glass immersed in an electrolyte solution. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:80-87.
14. Munting E. The contributions and limitations of hydroxyapa- tite coatings to implant fixation: A histomorphometric study of load bearing implants in dogs. Int Orthop 1996;20:1-6.
15. Rokkum M, Reigstad A, Johansson CB. HA particles can be released from well-fixed HA-coated stems: Histopathology of biopsies from 20 hips 2-8 years after implantation. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73:298-306.
16. Neumann H-G, Beck U, Drawe M, Steinbach J. Multilayer systems for corrosion protection of steainless steel implants. Surf Coating Technol 1998;98:1157-1161.
17. Szmukler M, Perrin D, Ahossi V, Pointaire PH. Evaluation of Bonit", a fully resorbable CaP coating obtained by electrochemical deposition, after 6 weeks of healing: A pilot study. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Ceramics in Medicine, Bologna, Italy, 22-26 November (2000). Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 192-195. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications; 2001. p 395-398.
18. Szmukler-Moncler S, Zeggel P, Perrin D, Bernard JP, Neumann HG. From micro-roughness to resorbable biomaterials. In: Ellingsen JE, editor. Improving the Biomaterials-Implant Interface. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2003. p 73-100.
19. Hönig JF, Merten HA. Das Göttinger Miniaturschwein (GMS) als Versuchstier in der human-medizinischen osteologischen Grundlagenforschung. Z Zahnärztl Implantol 1993:9;244- 254.
20. Kunz E. Das Schwein als Versuchstier. In: Jilge B, Kuhnt B, Kunz E, Lübbe R, editors. Tierexperimentelle Forschung- Erkenntnisse und Moglichkeiten. Society for Laboratory Animal Science GV-SOLAS. Ulm: Fotozentrale der Universität Ulm; 2001. p 66-74.
21. Thomsen M, von Strachwitz B, Loew M, Cotta H, Kirsch S, Schunk O, Kubein-Meesenburg D. The Gottinger minipig as an animal model in hip endoprosthesis. Anatomy, anesthesia, operation results. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1997;135:58-62.
22. Schnettler R, Dingeldein E, Herr G. Defect reconstruction using demineralized bone matrix. Experimental studies on piglets. Orthopade 1998;27:80-88.
23. Schreiner U, Schroeder-Boersch H, Schwarz M, Scheller G. Improvement of osteointegration of bioinert ceramics by modification of the surface-Results of an animal experiment. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2002;47:164-168.
24. Schreiner U, Schwarz M, Scheller G, Schroeder-Boersch H, lani L. Osseontegration of trial implants of carbon fiber reinforced plastics. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2000;138:540-543.
25. Wilke A, Orth J, Kraft M, Griss P. Standardized infection model for the study of bony ingrowth dynamics of hydroxy- apatite-coatedand uncoated pure titanium mesh in swine femur. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1993;131:370-376.
26. Parfitt AM, Drenzner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR. Bone histomorphipetry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. J Bone Miner Res 1987;2:595-610.
27. An YH, Draughn RA. Mechanical properties and testing methods of bone. In: An YH, Friedman RJ, editors. Animal Models in Orthopaedic Research. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1999. p 139-163.
28. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding). J Oral Pathology 1982;11:318-326.
29. Romeis B. Mikroskopische Technik. München: Urban und Schwarzenberg Verlag; 1989.
30. Walker GA. Repeat-measures ANOVA. In: Walker GA, editor. Common Statistical Methods for Clinical Research with SAS" Examples. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1997 (2nd printing), p 87-113.
31. Jobson JD. Multiple comparisons. In: Applied Multivariate Data Analysis, Vol. I: Regression and Experimental Design. New York: Springer; 1991. p 409-416.
32. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:120-128.
33. Szmukler-Moncler S, Perrin D, Ahossi V, Magnin G, Bernard JP. Biological properties of acid etched titanium implants: Effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;68:149-159.
34. Chen CQ, Scott W, Barker TM. Effect of metal surface topography on mechanical bonding at simulated total hip stem- cement interfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:440-446.
35. Szmukler-Moncler S, Testori T, Bernard JP. Etched implants: A comparative surface analysis of four implant systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;69:46-57.
36. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxil- lofac Implants 2000;15:331-344.
37. Cheal EJ, Snyder BD, Nunamaker DM, Hayes WC. Trabecular bone remodelling around smooth and porous implants in an equine patellar model. J Biomech 1987;20:1121-1134.
38. Franchi M, Bacchelli B, Martini D, Pasquale VD, Orsini E, Otani V, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Giardino R, Ruiggieri A. Early detachment of titanium particles form carious different surfaces if endosseous dental implants. Biomaterials 2004;25:2239-2246.
39. Bernard JP, Szmukler-Moncler S, Pessotto S, Vazquez L, Belser UC. The anchorage of Branemark and ITI implants of different lengths. I. An experimental study in the canine mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:593-600.
40. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC, editors. Clinical Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1990. p 309-314.
41. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Orbegoso CM, Sefter JC, Dmi- triev AE, Fedder IL. Analysis of porous ingrowth in intervertebral disc prostheses: A nonhuman primate model. Spine 2003;28:332-340.
42. Klein CP, Patka P, van der Lubbe HB, Wolke JG, de Groot K. Plasma-sprayed coatings of tetracalciumphosphate, hydroxyl- apatite, and α-TCP on titanium alloy: An interface study. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:53-65.
43. Klein CP, Wolke JG, de Blieck-Hogervorst JM, de Groot K. Calcium phosphate plasma-sprayed coatings and their stability: an in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:909-917.
44. Maxian SH, Zawadsky JP, Dunn MG. Mechanical and histological evaluation of amorphous calcium phosphate and poorly crystallized hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:717-728.
45. Dalton JE, Cook SD. In vivo mechanical and histological characteristics of HA-coated implants vary with coating vendor. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:239-245.
46. Bauer TW, Taylor SK, Jiang M, Medendorp SV. An indirect comparison of third-body wear in retrieved hydroxyapatite- coated, porous, and cemented femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;298:11-18.
47. Gottlander M, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Short- and long- term animal studies with a plasma-sprayed calcium phosphate-coated implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:345-351.
48. Burgess AV, Story BJ, Wagner WR, Trisi P, Pikos MA, Gut- tenberg SA. Highly crystalline MP-1 hydroxylapatite coating. II. In vivo performance on endosseous root implants in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:257-266.
49. Karabuda C, Sandalli P, Yalcin S, Steflik DE, Parr GR. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: A pilot study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:510-515.
50. Gross KA, Berndt CC, Goldschlag DD, Iacono VJ. In vitro changes of hydroxyapatite coatings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:589-597.
51. Clemens JA, Klein CP, Sakkers RJ, Dhert WJ, de Groot K, Rozing PM. Healing of gaps around calcium phosphate- coated implants in trabecular bone of the goat. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:55-64.
52. Bloebaum RD, Zou L, Bachus KN, Shea KG, Hofmann AA, Dunn HK. Analysis of particles in acetabular components from patients with osteolysis. Clin Orthop 1997;338:109-118.
53. Rokkum M, Reigstad A, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Tissue reactions adjacent to well-fixed hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups. Histopathology of ten specimens retrieved at reoperation after 0.3 to 5.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85:440-447.
54. Siebold R, Scheller G, Schreiner U, Jani L. Long-term results with the cement-free Spotorno CLS shaft. Orthopade 2001;30: 317-322.
55. Feighan JE, Goldberg VM, Davy D, Parr JA, Stevenson S. The influence of surface blasting on the incorporation of titanium- alloy impants in a rabbit intramedullary model. J Bone Joint Surg A 1995;77:1380-1395.
56. Goldberg VM, Stevenson S, Feighan J, Davy D. Biology of grit-blasted titanium alloy implants. Clin Orthop 1995;319: 122-129.
57. Hacking SA, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. The osseous response to corundum blasted implant surfaces in a canine hip model. Clin Orthop 1999;364:240-253.
58. Vestermark MT, Bechtold JE, Swider P, Soballe K. Mechanical interface conditions affect morphology and cellular activity of sclerotic bone rims forming around experimental loaded implants. J Orthop Res 2004;22:647-652.
59. Szmukler-Moncler S, Reingewirtz Y, Weber HP. Bone response to early loading: The effect of surface state. In: Davidovitch Z, Norton LA, editors. Biological Mechanisms of Tooth Movement and Craniofacial Adaptation. Boston: Harvard Society for the Advancement of Orthodontics; 1996. p 611-616.
60. Mouzin O, Soballe K, Bechtold JE. Loading improves anchorage of hydroxyapatite implants more than titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:61-68.
61. Schenk RK, Willenegger HR. Zur Histologie der primären Knochenheilung. Unfallheilkunde 1977;80:155-160.
62. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP, Snetivy D, Nolte LP. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.