Theory successfully predicts hiding time: New data for the lizard Sceloporus virgatus and a review

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 585-592

  Cooper Jr , William E ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

Author keywords

Emergence time; Escape theory; Hiding time; Predation risk; Refuge use; Squamata; Thermal cost

Indexed keywords

BIOENERGETICS; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EMERGENCE; ESCAPE BEHAVIOR; FLIGHT; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LITERATURE REVIEW; LIZARD; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; REFUGE; THERMOREGULATION;

SCELOPORUS VIRGATUS; SQUAMATA;

EID: 66149137317     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp035     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Amo L, López P, Martín J. 2003. Risk level and thermal costs affect the choice of escape strategy and refuge use in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Copeia. 2003:899-905.
2. Amo L, López P, Martín J. 2004a. Thermal dependence of chemical assessment of predation risk affects ability of wall lizards, Podarcis muralis, to avoid unsafe refuges. Physiol Behav. 82:913-918.
3. Amo L, López P, Martín J. 2004b. Wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues of ambush snake predators to avoid overestimating risk inside refuges. Anim Behav. 67:647-653.
4. Amo L, López P, Martín J. 2006. Can wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues to discriminate predatory from non-predatory snakes inside refuges? Ethology. 112:478-484.
5. Amo L, López P, Martín J. 2007. Refuge use: a conflict between avoiding predation and losing mass in lizards. Physiol Behav. 90:334-343.
6. Ballinger RE, Nietfeldt JW, Krupa JJ. 1979. An experimental analysis of the role of the tail in attaining high running speed in Cnemidophorus sexlineatus (Reptilia: Squamata: Lacertilia). Herpetologica. 35: 114-116.
7. Bartholomew GA. 1982. Physiological control of body temperature. In: Gans C, Harvey Pough F, editors. Biology of the Reptila, Vol. 12. Physiology C: Physiological Ecology. New York: Academic Press. p. 167-211.
8. Bennett AF. 1980. Thermal dependence of lizard behavior. Anim Behav. 28:752-762.
9. Blumstein DT. 2003. Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. J Wildl Manage. 67:852-857.
10. Blumstein DT, Pelletier D. 2005. Yellow-bellied marmot hiding time is sensitive to variation in costs. Can J Zool. 83:363-367.
11. Bulova SJ. 1994. Ecological correlates of population and individual variation in antipredator behavior of two species of desert lizards. Copeia. 1994:980-992.
12. Burger J, Gochfeld M. 1990. Risk discrimination of direct versus tangential approach by basking black iguana (Ctenosaura similis): variation as a function of human exposure. J Comp Psychol. 104: 388-394.
13. Clark CW. 1994. Antipredator behavior and the asset-protection principle. Behav Ecol. 5:159-170.
14. Cohen J. 1992. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 112:155-159.
15. Cooper WE Jr. 1997a. Factors affecting risk and cost of escape by the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps): predator speed, directness of approach, and female presence. Herpetologica. 53:464-474.
16. Cooper WE Jr. 1997b. Escape by a refuging prey, the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). Can J Zool. 75:943-947.
17. Cooper WE Jr. 1997c. Threat factors affecting antipredatory behavior in the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps): repeated approach, change in predator path, and predator's field of view. Copeia. 1997:613-619.
18. Cooper WE Jr. 1998. Risk factors and emergence from refuge in the lizard Eumeces laticeps. Behaviour. 135:1065-1076.
19. Cooper WE Jr. 1999. Tradeoffs between courtship, fighting, and antipredatory behavior by a lizard, Eumeces laticeps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 47:54-59.
20. Cooper WE Jr. 2000a. Tradeoffs between predation risk and feeding in a lizard, the broad- headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). Behaviour. 137:1175-1189.
21. Cooper WE Jr. 2000b. Effect of temperature on escape behaviour by an ectothermic vertebrate, the keeled earless lizard (Holbrookia propinqua). Behaviour. 137:1299-1315.
22. Cooper WE Jr. 2003. Risk factors affecting escape behaviour in the desert iguana, Dipsosaurus dorsalis: speed and directness of predator approach, degree of cover, direction of turning by a predator, and temperature. Can J Zool. 81:979-984.
23. Cooper WE Jr. 2005. When and how does starting distance affect flight initiation distance. Can J Zool. 83:1045-1050.
24. Cooper WE Jr. 2007. Compensatory changes in escape and refuge use following autotomy in the lizard Sceloporus virgatus. Can J Zool. 85:99-107.
25. Cooper WE Jr. Forthcoming. Optimal escape theory predicts escape behaviors beyond flight initiation distance: risk assessment and escape by striped plateau lizards (Sceloporus virgatus). Curr Zool.
26. Cooper WE Jr, Frederick WG. 2007a. Optimal time to emerge from refuge. Biol J Linn Soc. 91:375-382.
27. Cooper WE Jr, Frederick WG. 2007b. Optimal flight initiation distance. J Theor Biol. 244:59-67.
28. Cooper WE Jr, Martín J, López P. 2003. Simultaneous risks and differences among individual predators affect refuge use by a lizard, Lacerta monticola. Behaviour. 140:27-41.
29. Cooper WE Jr, Pérez-Mellado V. 2004. Tradeoffs between escape behavior and foraging opportunity by the Balearic lizard (Podarcis lilfordi). Herpetologica. 60:321-324.
30. Cooper WE Jr, Vitt LJ, Caldwell JP, Fox SF. 2001. Foraging modes of some American lizards: relationships among measurement variables and discreteness of modes. Herpetologica. 57:65-76.
31. Cooper WE Jr, Wilson DS. 2007a. Beyond optimal escape theory: microhabitats as well as predation risk affect escape and refuge use by the phrynosomatid lizard Sceloporus virgatus. Behaviour. 144: 1235-1254.
32. Cooper WE Jr, Wilson DS. 2007b. Sex and social costs of escaping in the striped plateau lizard Sceloporus virgatus. Behav Ecol. 18: 764-768.
33. Cooper WE Jr, Wilson DS. Forthcoming. Thermal cost of refuge use affects refuge entry and hiding time by striped plateau lizards Sceloporus virgatus. Herpetologica.
34. Cortina JM, Hossein N. 2000. Effect size for ANOVA designs. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications.
35. Díaz-Uriarte R. 1999. Anti-predator behaviour changes following an aggressive encounter in the lizard Tropidurus hispidus. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 266:2457-2464.
36. Dill LM, Fraser AHG. 1997. The worm re-turns: hiding behavior of a tube-dwelling marine polychaete, Serpula vermicularis. Behav Ecol. 8:186-193.
37. Dill LM, Gillet JF. 1991. The economic logic of barnacle Balanus glandula (Darwin) hiding behavior. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 153:115-127.
38. Hugie DM. 2003. The waiting game: a "battle of waits" between predator and prey. Behav Ecol. 14:807-817.
39. Jennions MD, Backwell PRY, Mourai M, Christy JH. 2003. Hiding behaviour in fiddler crabs: how long should prey hide in response to a potential predator? Anim Behav. 66:251-257.
40. Koivula K, Rytkonen S, Orell M. 1995. Hunger-dependency of hiding behaviour after a predator attack in dominant and subordinate willow tits. Ardea. 83:397-404.
41. Kortet R, Rantala MJ, Hedrick A. 2007. Boldness in anti-predator behaviour and immune defence in field crickets. Evol Ecol Res. 9:185-197.
42. Krause J, Cheng DJ-S, Kirkman E, Ruxton GD. 2000. Species-specific patterns of refuge use in fish: the role of metabolic expenditure and body length. Behaviour. 137:1113-1127.
43. Krause J, Loader SP, McDermott J, Ruxton GD. 1998. Refuge use by fish as a function of body length-related metabolic expenditure and predation risk. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 265:2373-2379.
44. Krause J, Longworth P, Ruxton GD. 2000. Refuge use in sticklebacks as a function of body length and group size. J Fish Biol. 56:1023-1027.
45. Martín J, López P. 1996. The escape response of juvenile Psammodromus lizards. J Comp Psychol. 110:187-192.
46. Martín J, López P. 1999a. When to come out from a refuge: risk-sensitive and state-dependent decisions in an alpine lizard. Behav Ecol. 10: 487-492.
47. Martín J, López P. 1999b. An experimental test of the costs of antipredatory refuge use in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Oikos. 84:499-505.
48. Martín J, López P. 2000. Costs of refuge use affect escape decisions by Iberian rock lizards Lacerta monticola. Ethology. 106:483-492.
49. Martín J, López P. 2001. Repeated predatory attacks and multiple decisions to come out of refuge in an alpine lizard. Behav Ecol. 12:386-389.
50. Martín J, López P. 2003. Ontogenetic variation in antipredator behavior of Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola): effects of body-sizedependent thermal-exchange rates and costs of refuge use. Can J Zool. 81:1131-1137.
51. Martín J, López P. 2004. Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola) assess short-term changes in predation risk level when deciding refuge use. J Comp Psychol. 118:280-286.
52. Martín J, López P. 2005. Wall lizards modulate refuge use through continuous assessment of predation risk level. Ethology. 111:207-219.
53. Martín J, López P, Cooper WE Jr. 2003a. Loss of mating opportunities influences refuge use in the Iberian rock lizard, Lacerta monticola. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 54:505-510.
54. Martín J, López P, Cooper WE Jr. 2003b. When to come out from a refuge: balancing predation risk and foraging opportunities in an alpine lizard. Ethology. 109:77-87.
55. Martín J, Marcos I, López P. 2005. When to come out from your own shell: risk-sensitive hiding decisions in terrapins. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 57:405-411.
56. Newcombe RG. 2006. Confidence intervals for an effect size measure based on the Mann-Whitney statistic. Part 1: general issues and tailarea-based methods. Stat Med. 25:543-557.
57. Petrie ME, Ryer CH. 2006. Hunger, light level and body size affect refuge use by post-settlement lingcod Ophiodon elongatus. J Fish Biol. 69:957-969.
58. Polo V, López P, Martín J. 2005. Balancing the thermal costs and benefits of refuge use to cope with persistent attacks from predators: a model and an experiment with an alpine lizard. Evol Ecol Res. 7:23-35.
59. Punzo F. 1982. Tail autotomy and running speed in the lizards Cophosaurus texanus and Uma notata. J Herpetol. 16:329-331.
60. Rand AS. 1964. Inverse relationship between temperature and shyness in the lizard Anolis lineatopus. Ecology. 45:863-864.
61. Reaney LT. 2007. Foraging and mating opportunities influence refuge use in the fiddler crab, Uca mjoebergi. Anim Behav. 73:711-716.
62. Rhoades E, Blumstein DT. 2007. Predicted fitness consequences of threat-sensitive hiding behavior. Behav Ecol. 18:937-943.
63. Rosenthal R, Rubin DB. 2003. r equivalent: a simple effect size indicator. Psychol Methods. 8:492-496.
64. Saloom ME, Duncan RS. 2005. Low dissolved oxygen levels reduce anti-predation behaviours of the freshwater clam Corbicula fluminea. Freshw Biol. 50:1233-1238.
65. Scarratt AM, Godin J-GJ. 1992. Foraging and antipredator decisions in the hermit crab Pagurus acadianus(Benedict). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 156:225-238.
66. Sih A. 1992. Prey uncertainty and the balancing of antipredator and feeding needs. Am Nat. 139:1052-1069.
67. Smith DG. 1997. Ecological factors influencing the antipredator behaviors of the ground skink, Scincella lateralis. Behav Ecol. 8: 622-629.
68. Smith GR, Ballinger RE. 1994. Thermal ecology of Sceloporus virgatus from Southeastern Arizona, with comparison to Urosaurus ornatus. J Herpetol. 28:65-69.
69. Stankowich T, Blumstein DT. 2005. Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 272:2627-2634.
70. Stankowich T, Coss RG. 2006. Effects of predator behavior and proximity on risk assessment by Columbian black-tailed deer. Behav Ecol. 17:246-254.
71. Stuart-Fox D, Whiting MJ, Mousalli A. 2006. Camouflage and colour change: antipredator responses to bird and snake predators across multiple populations in a dwarf chameleon. Biol J Linn Soc. 88:437-446.
72. Verwaijen D, Van Damme R. 2008. Foraging mode and its flexibility in lacertid lizards from Europe. J Herpetol. 42:124-133.
73. Wolf NG, Kramer DL. 1987. Use of cover and the need to breathe: the effects of hypoxia on vulnerability of dwarf gouramis to predatory snakeheads. Oecologia. 73:127-132.
74. Ydenberg RC, Dill LM. 1986. The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Study Behav. 16:229-249.