When and how do predator starting distances affect flight initiation distances?

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 83, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1045-1050

  Cooper Jr , W E ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ECONOMICS; MONITORING;

ARTIFACTUAL EFFECTS; ECOLOGICAL FACTORS;

ECOLOGY;

ESCAPE BEHAVIOR; LIZARD; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

AVES; SCELOPORUS VIRGATUS; SQUAMATA; UROSAURUS ORNATUS;

EID: 28444454088     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/Z05-104     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Amo, L., López, P., and Martín, J. 2003. Risk level and thermal costs affect the choice of escape strategy and refuge use in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Copeia, 2003: 899-905.
2. Blumstein, D.T. 2003. Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. J. Wildl. Manag. 67: 852-857.
3. Bulova, S.J. 1994. Ecological correlates of population and individual variation in antipredator behavior of two species of desert lizards. Copeia, 1994: 980-992.
4. Burger, J., and Gochfeld, M. 1990. Risk discrimination of direct versus tangential approach by basking black iguana (Ctenosaura similis): variation as a function of human exposure. J. Comp. Psychol. 104: 388-394.
5. Cooper, W.E., Jr. 1997a. Factors affecting risk and cost of escape by the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps): predator speed, directness of approach, and female presence. Herpetologica, 53: 464-474.
6. Cooper, W.E., Jr. 1997b. Threat factors affecting antipredatory behavior in the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps): repeated approach, change in predator path, and predator's field of view. Copeia, 1997: 613-619.
7. Cooper, W.E., Jr. 1997c. Escape by a refuging prey, the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). Can. J. Zool. 75: 943-947.
8. Cooper, W.E., Jr. 1998a. Risk factors and emergence from refuge in the lizard Eumeces laticeps. Behaviour, 135: 1065-1076.
9. Cooper, W.E., Jr. 1998b. Direction of predator turning, a neglected cue to predation risk. Behaviour, 135: 55-64.
10. Cooper, W.E., Jr. 1999. Tradeoffs between courtship, fighting, and antipredatory behavior by a lizard, Eumeces laticeps. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47: 54-59.
11. Cooper, W.E., Jr. 2000. Tradeoffs between predation risk and feeding in a lizard, the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). Behaviour, 137: 1175-1189.
12. Cooper, W.E., Jr. 2003a. Risk factors affecting escape behaviour in the desert iguana, Dipsosaurus dorsalis: speed and directness of predator approach, degree of cover, direction of turning by a predator, and temperature. Can. J. Zool. 81: 979-984.
13. Cooper, W.E., Jr. 2003b. Effect of risk on aspects of escape behavior by a lizard, Holbrookia propinqua, in relation to optimal escape theory. Ethology, 109: 617-626.
14. Cooper, W.E., Jr., Vitt, L.J., Caldwell, J.P., and Fox, S.F. 2001. Foraging modes of some American lizards: relationships among measurement variables and discreteness of modes. Herpetologica, 57: 65-76.
15. Cooper, W.E., Jr., Perez-Mellado, V., Baird, T.A., Baird, T.A., Caldwell, J.P., and Vitt, L.J. 2003a. Effects of risk, cost, and their interaction on optimal escape by nonrefuging Bonaire whiptail lizards, Cnemidophorus murinus. Behav. Ecol. 14: 288-293.
16. Cooper, W.E., Jr., Martín, J., and López, P. 2003b. Simultaneous risks and differences among individual predators affect refuge use by a lizard, Lacerta monticola. Behaviour, 140: 27-41.
17. Cuadrado, M., Martín, J., and López, P. 2001. Camouflage and escape decisions in the common chameleon Chamaeleo chamaeleon. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.72: 547-554.
18. Heatwole, H. 1968. Relationship of escape behavior and camouflage in anoline lizards. Copeia, 1968: 109-113.
19. Labra, A., and Leonard, R. 1999. Intraspecific variation in antipredator response of three species of lizards (Liolaemus): possible effects of human presence. J. Herpetol. 33: 441-448.
20. Lima, S.L., and Dill, L.M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
21. Martín, J., and López, P. 1995. Influence of habitat structure on the escape tactics of the lizard Psammodromus algirus. Can. J. Zool. 73: 129-132.
22. Martín, J., and López, P. 1996. The escape response of juvenile Psammodromus lizards. J. Comp. Psychol. 110: 187-192.
23. Martín, J., and López, P. 1999. When to come out from a refuge: risk-sensitive and state-dependent decisions in an alpine lizard. Behav. Ecol. 110: 187-192.
24. Rand, A.S. 1964. Inverse relationship between temperature and shyness in the lizard Anolis lineatopus. Ecology, 45: 863-864.
25. Scharf, P.S., Buckel, J.A., McGinn, P.A., and Juanes, F. 2003. Vulnerability of marine forage fishes to piscivory: effects of prey behavior on susceptibility to attack and capture. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 294: 41-59.
26. Sih, A. 1992. Prey uncertainty and the balancing of antipredator and feeding needs. Am. Nat. 139: 1052-1069.
27. Ydenberg, R.C., and Dill, L.M. 1986. The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv. Stud. Behav. 16: 229-249.