Predicted fitness consequences of threat-sensitive hiding behavior (Behavioral Ecology (2007) 18, (937-943) DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arm064);Predicted fitness consequences of threat-sensitive hiding behavior

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 937-943

  Rhoades, Elizabeth ^a   Blumstein, Daniel T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Antipredator behavior; Dynamic modeling; Hiding behavior; Marmota flaviventris; Marmots; Predation risk; Refuge use

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; AVOIDANCE REACTION; FITNESS; HABITAT USE; PREDATION RISK; REFUGE; RODENT;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; MARMOTA; MARMOTA FLAVIVENTRIS; RODENTIA; SCIURIDAE;

EID: 34548437527     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arn094     Document Type: Erratum

References (36)

1. Armitage KB, Downhower JF, Svendsen GE. 1976. Seasonal changes in weights of marmots. Am Midl Nat. 96:36-51.
2. Blumstein DT, Pelletier D. 2005. Yellow-bellied marmot hiding time is sensitive to variation in costs. Can J Zool. 83:363-367.
3. Blumstein DT, Runyan A, Seymour M, Nicodemus A, Ozgul A, Ransler F, Im S, Stark T, Zugmeyer C, Daniel JC. 2004. Locomotor ability and wariness in yellow-bellied marmots. Ethology. 110:615-634.
4. Bouskila A, Blumstein DT. 1992. Rules of thumb for predation hazard assessment predictions from a dynamic model. Am Nat. 139:161-176.
5. Brodin A, Clark CW. 1997. Long-term hoarding in the Paridae: a dynamic model. Behav Ecol. 8:178-185.
6. Bryant AA, Page RE. 2005. Timing and causes of mortality in the endangered Vancouver Island marmot (Marmota vancouverensis). Can J Zool. 83:674-682.
7. Cárdenas YL, Shen B, Zung L, Blumstein DT. 2005. Evaluating temporal and spatial margins of safety in galahs. Anim Behav. 70:1395-1399.
8. Caro T. 2005. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
9. Cooper WE Jr. 1999. Tradeoffs between courtship, fighting, and anti-predatory behavior by a lizard, Eumeces laticeps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 47:54-59.
10. Cooper WE, Frederick WG. Forthcoming. Optimal time to emerge from refuge. Biol J Linn Soc Lond.
11. Cooper WE, Martín J, López P. 2003. Simultaneous risks and differences among individual predators affect refuge use by a lizard, Lacerta monticola. Behavior. 140:27-41.
12. Dill LM, Fraser AHG. 1997. The worm re-turns: hiding behavior of a tube dwelling marine polychaete, Serpula vermicularis. Behav Ecol. 8:186-193.
13. Dill LM, Gillett JF. 1991. The economic logic of barnacle Balanus glandula (Darwin) hiding behavior. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 153:115-127.
14. Eklov P, Persson L. 1996. The response of prey to the risk of predation: proximate cues for refuging juvenile fish. Anim Behav. 51:105-115.
15. Houston AI, McNamara JM, Hutchinson JMC. 1993. General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 341:375-397.
16. Hugie DM. 2003. The waiting game: a "battle of waits" between predator and prey. Behav Ecol. 14:807-817.
17. Hugie DM. 2004. A waiting game between the black-bellied plover and its fiddler crab prey. Anim Behav. 67:823-831.
18. Jennions MD, Backwell PRY, Murai M, Christy JH. 2003. Hiding behaviour in fiddler crabs: how long should prey hide in response to a potential predator? Anim Behav. 66:251-257.
19. Johansson A, Englund G. 1995. A predator-prey game between bullheads and case making caddis larvae. Anim Behav. 50:785-792.
20. Mangel M, Clark CW. 1988. Dynamic modeling in behavioral ecology. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
21. Martín J, López P. 1999. When to come out from a refuge: risk-sensitive and state dependent decisions in an alpine lizard. Behav Ecol. 10:487-492.
22. Martín J, López P. 2001. Repeated predatory attacks and multiple decisions to come out from a refuge in an alpine lizard. Behav Ecol. 4:386-389.
23. Martín J, López P. 2004. Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola) assess short-term changes in predation risk level when deciding refuge use. J Comp Psychol. 118:280-286.
24. Martín J, López P. 2005. Wall lizards modulate refuge use through continuous assessment of predation risk level. Ethology. 111:207-219.
25. Martín J, López P, Cooper WE Jr. 2003. When to come out from a refuge: balancing predation risk and foraging opportunities in an alpine lizard. Ethology. 109:77-87.
26. Mauck RA, Harkles KC. 2001. The effect of group membership on hiding behaviour in the northern rock barnacle, Semibalanus balanoides. Anim Behav. 62:743-748.
27. McNamara JM, Houston AI. 1986. The common currency for behavioral decisions. Am Nat. 127:358-378.
28. Salsbury CM, Armitage KB. 2003. Variation in growth rates of yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). In: Ramousse R, Allaine D, Le Berre M, editors. Adaptive strategies and diversity in marmots. Lyon (France): International Network on Marmots. p. 197-206.
29. SAS Institute, Inc. 1998. Statview 5.0. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, Inc.
30. StataCorp LP. 2006. Stata 9.0. College Station (TX): StataCorp.
31. Schwartz OA, Armitage KB, Van Vuren D. 1998. A 32-year demography of yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). J Zool London. 246:337-346.
32. Shine R. 2005. Life-history evolution in reptiles. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 36:23-46.
33. Shine R, Olsson MM, Lemaster MP, Moore IT, Mason RT. 2000. Effects of sex, body size, temperature, and location of the antipredator tactics of free-ranging garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis, Colubridae). Behav Ecol. 11:239-245.
34. Sih A, Kats LB, Moore RD. 1992. Effects of Predatory Sunfish on the Density, Drift, and Refuge Use of Stream Salamander Larvae. Ecology. 73:1418-1430.
35. Van Vuren DH. 2001. Predation on yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). Am Midl Nat. 145:94-100.
36. Van Vuren DH, Armitage KB. 1994. Reproductive success of colonial and noncolonial female yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). J Mamm. 75:950-955.