Species and population differences in social recognition between fishes: A role for ecology?

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 511-516

  Ward, A J W ^a   Webster, M M ^b   Magurran, A E ^b   Currie, S ^c   Krause, J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^c MOUNT ALLISON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chemosensory; Fission fusion; Groups; Head; Ocial recognition; Shoaling; Social organization

Indexed keywords

CONSPECIFIC; CYPRINID; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HABITAT USE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; RECOGNITION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SENSORY SYSTEM; SOCIAL ORGANIZATION;

ANIMALIA; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS; PISCES; POECILIA RETICULATA;

EID: 66149111014     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp025     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aeschlimann PB, Haberli MA, Reusch TBH, Boehm T, Milinski M. 2003. Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 54:119-126.
2. Behrmann-Godel J, Gerlach G, Eckmann R. 2006. Kin and population recognition in sympatric Lake Constance perch (Perca fluviatilis L.): can assortative shoaling drive population divergence? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 59:461-468.
3. Bell MA, Foster SA. 1994. Introduction to the evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. In: Bell MA, Foster SA, editors. The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1994. Controlling the false discovery rate-apractical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B. 57:289-300.
5. Boyd R, Richerson PJ. 1988. The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. J Theor Biol. 132:337-356.
6. Brown C. 2002. Do female rainbowfish (Melanotaenia spp.) prefer to shoal with familiar individuals under predation pressure? J Ethol. 20:89-94.
7. Chivers DP, Brown GE, Smith RJF. 1995. Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) - implications for antipredator behavior. Can J Zool. 73:955-960.
8. Croft DP, James R, Thomas POR, Hathaway C, Mawdsley D, Laland KN, Krause J. 2006. Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies ( Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 59:644-650.
9. Dugatkin LA, Alfieri M. 1991. Tit-for-tat in guppies (Poecilia reticulata)-therelativenatureofcooperation and defection during predator inspection. Evol Ecol. 5:300-309.
10. Frommen JG, Bakker TCM. 2004. Adult three-spined sticklebacks prefer to shoal with familiar kin. Behaviour. 141:1401-1409.
11. Frommen JG, Luz C, Bakker TCM. 2007. Kin discrimination in sticklebacks is mediated by social learning rather than innate recognition. Ethology. 113:276-282.
12. Godin JGJ, Alfieri MS, Hoare DJ, Sadowski JA. 2003. Conspecific familiarity and shoaling preferences in a wild guppy population. Can J Zool. 81:1899-1904.
13. Gomez-Laplaza LM, Fuente A. 2007. Shoaling decisions in angelfish: the roles of social status and familiarity. Ethology. 113:847-855.
14. Griffiths SW. 2003. Learned recognition of conspecifics by fishes. Fish Fish. 4:256-268.
15. Griffiths SW, Brockmark S, Hojesjo J, JohnssonJI. 2004. Coping with divided attention: the advantage of familiarity. Proc R Soc Lond B. 271:695-699.
16. Griffiths S, Magurran AE. 1997a. Familiarity in schooling fish: how long does it take to acquire? Anim Behav. 53:945-949.
17. Griffiths S, Magurran AE. 1997b. Schooling preferences for familiar fish vary with group size in a wild guppy population. Proc R Soc Lond B. 264:547-551.
18. Griffiths SW. 1997. Preferences for familiar fish do not vary with predation risk in the European minnow. J Fish Biol. 51:489-495.
19. Griffiths SW, Ward AJW. 2006. Learned recognition of conspecifics. In: Brown C, Laland KN,KrauseJ,editors.FishLearning& Behaviour. Oxford (UK): Chapman and Hall.
20. Helfman GS. 1984. School fidelity in fishes: the yellow perch pattern. Anim Behav. 32:663-672.
21. Hoare DJ, Krause J, Ruxton GD, Godin JGJ. 2000. The social organisation of free-ranging fish shoals. Oikos. 89:546-554.
22. Klimley AP, Holloway CF. 1999. School fidelity and homing synchro- nicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares. Mar Biol. 133:307-317.
23. Krause J, Ward AJW, Croft DP, James R. 2008. Group living and social networks. In: Magnhagen C, Braithwaite V, Forsgren E, Kapoor BG, editors. Fish Behaviour. Enfield (NH): Science Publisher.
24. Magurran AE. 2005. Evolutionary ecology: the Trinidadian guppy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford series in ecology and evolution.
25. Magurran AE, Queiroz HL. 2003. Partner choice in piranha shoals. Behaviour. 140:289-299.
26. Matsumura K, Matsunaga S, Fusetani N. 2007. Phosphatidylcholine profile-mediated group recognition in catfish. J Exp Biol. 11:1992-1999.
27. Milinski M, Kulling D, Kettler R. 1990. Tit for tat: sticklebacks 'trusting' a cooperating partner. Behav Ecol. 1:7-12.
28. Milinski M, Pfluger D, Kulling D, Kettler R. 1990. Do sticklebacks cooperate repeatedly in reciprocal pairs? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 27:17-21.
29. Sachs JL, Mueller UG, Wilcox TP, Bull JJ. 2004. The evolution of cooperation. Q Rev Biol. 79:135-160.
30. Thomas POR, Croft DP, Morrell LJ, Davis A, Faria JJ, Dyer JRG, Piyapong C, Ramnarine I, Ruxton GD, Krause J. 2008. Does defection during predator inspection affect social structure in wild shoals of guppies? Anim Behav. 75:43-53.
31. Waas JR, Colgan PW. 1994. Male sticklebacks can distinguish between familiar rivals on the basis of visual cues alone. Anim Behav. 47:7-13.
32. Ward AJW, Botham MS, Hoare DJ, James R, Broom M, Godin JGJ, Krause J. 2002. Association patterns and shoal fidelity in the threespined stickleback. Proc R Soc Lond B. 269:2451-2455.
33. Ward AJW, Hart PJB. 2003. The effects of kin and familiarity on interactions between fish. Fish Fish. 4:348-358.
34. Ward AJW, Hart PJB. 2005. Foraging benefits of shoaling with familiars may be exploited by outsiders. Anim Behav. 69:329-335.
35. Ward AJW, Hart PJB, Krause J. 2004. The effects of habitat- and dietbased cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks. Behav Ecol. 15:925-929.
36. Ward AJW, Holbrook RI, Krause J, Hart PJB. 2005. Social recognition in sticklebacks: the role of direct experience and habitat cues. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 57:575-583.
37. Ward AJW, Webster MM, Hart PJB. 2007. Social recognition in wild fish populations. Proc R Soc Lond B. 274:1071-1077.
38. Webster MM, Goldsmith J, Ward AJW, Hart PJB. 2007. Habitat specific chemical cues influence association preferences and shoal cohesion in fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 62:273-280.
39. Webster MM, Hart PJB. 2007. Prior association reduces kleptoparasitic prey competition in shoals of three-spined sticklebacks. Anim Behav. 74:253-258.