Preferences for familiar fish do not vary with predation risk in the European minnow

Journal of Fish Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 489-495

  Griffiths, S W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Familiarity; Individual recognition; Partner choice; Phoxinus phoxinus; Predation risk

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIOUR; EUROPEAN MINNOW; PIKE; PREDATION RISK; SCHOOLING BEHAVIOUR;

UK, ENGLAND, FROME RIVER;

ESOX LUCIUS; PHOXINUS PHOXINUS;

EID: 0031239351     PISSN: 00221112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jfbi.1997.0454     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allan J. R, Pitcher T. J. Species segregation during predator evasion in cyprinid shoals. Freshwater Biology. 16:1986;653-659.
2. Avise J. C, Shapiro D. Y. Evaluating kinship of newly settled juveniles within social groups of the coral reef fishAnthias squamipinnis. Evolution. 40:1986;1051-1059.
3. Brown J. A, Colgan P. W. Individual and species recognition in centrarchid fishes: evidence and hypotheses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 19:1986;373-379.
4. Brown G. E, Smith R. J. F. Fathead minnows use chemical cues to discriminate natural shoalmates from unfamiliar conspecifics. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 20:1994;3051-3061.
5. Chivers D. P, Brown G. E, Smith R. J. F. Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 73:1995;955-960.
6. Dugatkin L. A, Wilson D. S. The prerequisites for strategic behaviour in bluegill sunfish,Lepomis macrochirus. Animal Behaviour. 44:1992;223-230.
7. Dugatkin L. A, Wilson D. S. Fish behaviour, partner choice experiments and cognitive ethology. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 3:1993;368-372.
8. Griffiths S. W, Magurran A. E. Schooling preferences for familiar fish vary with group size in a wild guppy population. Proceedings of The Royal Society (London) B. 264:1997a;547-551.
9. Griffiths S. W, Magurran A. E. Familiarity in schooling fish: how long does it take to develop? Animal Behaviour. 1997b.
10. Helfman G. S. School fidelity in fishes: the yellow perch pattern. Animal Behaviour. 32:1984;663-672.
11. Mann R. H. K. The numbers and production of pike (Esox lucius. Journal of Animal Ecology. 49:1980;899-915.
12. Mann R. H. K. The annual food consumption and prey preferences of pike (Esox lucius. Journal of Animal Ecology. 51:1982;81-95.
13. Magurran A. E, Girling S. L. Predator model recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows. Animal Behaviour. 34:1986;510-518.
14. Magurran A. E, Oulton W. J, Pitcher T. J. Vigilant behaviour and shoal size in minnows. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 67:1985;167-178.
15. Magurran A. E, Seghers B. H, Shaw P. W, Carvalho G. R. Schooling preferences for familiar fish in the guppy,Poecilia reticulata. Journal of Fish Biology. 45:1994;401-406.
16. Metcalfe N. B, Thomson B. C. Fish recognize and prefer to shoal with poor competitors. Proceedings of The Royal Society (London) B. 259:1995;207-210.
17. Milinski M, Pfluger D, Külling D, Kettler R. Do sticklebacks cooperate repeatedly in reciprocal pairs? Behavioural Ecology & Sociobiology. 27:1990;17-21.
18. Naish K.-A, Carvalho G. R, Pitcher T. J. The genetic structure and microdistribution of shoals ofPhoxinus phoxinus. Journal of Fish Biology. 43:1993;75-89.
19. Sokal R. R, Rohlf F. J. Biometry. 1995;W. H. Freeman, New York.
20. Van Havre N, FitzGerald G. J. Shoaling and kin recognition in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus. Biology of Behaviour. 13:1988;190-201.