Procedural Justice as Autonomy Regulation

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1166-1180

  van Prooijen, Jan Willem ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

autonomy; basic psychological needs; fairness; procedural justice; self determination

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 66049141640     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014153     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Baumeister R.F., Bratlavsky E., Finkenauer C., and Vohs K.D. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5 (2001) 323-370
2. Baumeister R.F., and Leary M.R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motive. Psychological Bulletin 117 (1995) 497-529
3. Bies R.J., and Moag J.S. Interactional justice. In: Lewicki R.J., Sheppard B.M., and Bazerman M.H. (Eds). Research on negotiations in organizations 1 (1986), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT 43-55
4. Boehm C. Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior (1999), Harvard University Press, London
5. Brehm S.S., and Brehm J.W. Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control (1981), Academic Press, New York
6. Brockner J., Heuer L., Siegel P.A., Wiesenfeld B., Martin C., Grover S., et al. The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1998) 394-407
7. Brockner J., and Wiesenfeld B.M. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin 120 (1996) 189-208
8. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., and Aiken L.S. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. (2003), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
9. Colquitt J.A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001) 386-400
10. Cranston M. The social contract (1968), Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, England (Original work published 1762)
11. Cropanzano R., Byrne Z.S., Bobocel D.R., and Rupp D.E. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior 58 (2001) 164-209
12. Deci E.L., Koestner R., and Ryan R.M. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999) 627-668
13. Deci E.L., and Ryan R.M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (1985), Plenum Press, New York
14. Deci E.L., and Ryan R.M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11 (2000) 227-268
15. Deci E.L., and Ryan R.M. Handbook of self-determination research (2002), The University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY
16. De Cremer D. Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (2002) 1335-1341
17. De Cremer D., and Sedikides C. Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 157-173
18. De Cremer D., and Tyler T.R. Managing group behavior: The interplay between fairness, self, and cooperation. In: Zanna M. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology (2005), Academic Press, New York 151-218
19. De Gilder D., and Wilke H.A.M. Expectation states theory and the motivational determinants of social influence. In: Stroebe W., and Hewstone M. (Eds). European review of social psychology 5 (1994), Wiley, London 243-269
20. Diekmann K.A., Sondak H., and Barsness Z.I. Does fairness matter more to some than to others? The moderating role of workplace status on the relationship between procedural fairness perceptions and job satisfaction. Social Justice Research 20 (2007) 161-180
21. Fiske S.T. Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology (2004), Wiley, New York
22. Folger R. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (1977) 108-119
23. Folger R. Emerging issues in the social psychology of justice. In: Folger R. (Ed). The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives (1984), Plenum Press, New York 3-24
24. Folger R. Fairness as deonance. In: Gilliland S.W., Steiner D.D., and Skarlicki D.P. (Eds). Research in social issues in management (2001), Information Age Publishers 3-31
25. Folger R., and Cropanzano R. Organizational justice and human resource management (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
26. Folger R., Rosenfield D., Grove J., and Corkran L. Effects of "voice" and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979) 2253-2261
27. Gagné M., and Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior 26 (2005) 331-362
28. Houlden P., LaTour S., Walker L., and Thibaut J. Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14 (1978) 13-30
29. Huo Y.J., Smith H.J., Tyler T.R., and Lind E.A. Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer?. Psychological Science 7 (1996) 40-45
30. Iyengar S.S., and Lepper M.R. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (2000) 995-1006
31. Komorita S.S., and Parks C.D. Social dilemmas (1994), Westview Press, Boulder, CO
32. Leventhal G.S. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen K.J., Greenberg M.S., and Willis R.H. (Eds). Social exchange: Advances on theory and research (1980), Plenum Press, New York 27-54
33. Lind E.A., Kanfer R., and Earley P.C. Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (1990) 952-959
34. Lind E.A., Kulik C.T., Ambrose M., and De Vera-Park M.V. Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (1993) 224-251
35. Lind E.A., and Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice (1988), Plenum Press, New York
36. Micelli M.P., Near J.P., and Schwenk C.R. Who blows the whistle and why?. Industrial & Labor Relations Review 45 (1991) 113-129
37. Moller A.C., Deci E.L., and Ryan R.M. Choice and ego-depletion: The moderating role of autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (2006) 1024-1036
38. Morgeson F.P. The external leadership of self-managing teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (2005) 497-508
39. Near J.P., Dworkin T.M., and Micelli M.P. Explaining the whistle-blowing process: Suggestions from power theory and justice theory. Organization Science 4 (1993) 393-411
40. Paolucci H. On crimes and punishment (1963), Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN (Original work published 1764)
41. Reis H.T., Sheldon K.M., Gable S.L., Roscoe J., and Ryan R.M. Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (2000) 419-435
42. Rozin P., Lowery L., Imada S., and Haidt J. The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1999) 574-586
43. Sheldon K.M. Creativity and self-determination in personality. Creativity Research Journal 8 (1995) 61-72
44. Sheldon K.M., and Elliot A.J. Not all personal goals are "personal": Comparing autonomous and controlling goals on effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (1998) 546-557
45. Sheldon K.M., Ryan R.M., Deci E.L., and Kasser T. The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It's both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (2004) 475-486
46. Sheldon K.M., Ryan R.M., and Reis H. What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (1996) 1270-1279
47. Simon B., and Stürmer S. Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (2003) 183-193
48. Sleebos E., Ellemers N., and De Gilder D. The carrot and the stick: Respected and disrespected group members' motives to engage in group-serving efforts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (2006) 244-255
49. Smith H.J., Tyler T.R., Huo Y.J., Ortiz D.J., and Lind E.A. The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 34 (1998) 470-493
50. Thibaut J., and Walker L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis (1975), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
51. Tyler T.R. Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (1987) 333-344
52. Tyler T.R. Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5 (1994) 850-863
53. Tyler T.R., and Blader S.L. Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement (2000), Psychology Press, Philadelphia
54. Tyler T.R., and Blader S.L. Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89 (2002) 813-838
55. Tyler T.R., and Blader S.L. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7 (2003) 349-361
56. Tyler T.R., and Lind E.A. A relational model of authority in groups. In: Zanna M. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology 25 (1992), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 115-292
57. Van den Bos K. Uncertainty management: The influence of human uncertainty on reactions to perceived fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (2001) 931-941
58. Van den Bos K. On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 482-498
59. Van den Bos K., and Lind E.A. Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology 34 (2002), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1-60
60. Van den Bos K., and Van Prooijen J.-W. Referent cognitions theory: The psychology of voice depends on closeness of reference points. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 616-626
61. Van den Bos K., Wilke H.A.M., and Lind E.A. When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1998) 1449-1458
62. Van Prooijen J.-W., De Cremer D., Van Beest I., Ståhl T., Van Dijke M., and Van Lange P.A.M. The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (2008) 1303-1315
63. Van Prooijen J.-W., Gallucci M., and Toeset G. Procedural justice in punishment systems: Inconsistent punishment procedures have detrimental effects on cooperation. British Journal of Social Psychology 47 (2008) 311-324
64. Van Prooijen J.-W., Karremans J.C., and Van Beest I. Procedural justice and the hedonic principle: How approach versus avoidance motivation influences the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 686-697
65. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van den Bos K., Lind E.A., and Wilke H.A.M. How do people react to negative procedures? On the moderating role of authority's biased attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (2006) 632-645
66. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van den Bos K., and Wilke H.A.M. Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002) 1353-1361
67. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van den Bos K., and Wilke H.A.M. Group belongingness and procedural justice: Social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 66-79
68. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van den Bos K., and Wilke H.A.M. Procedural justice and intragroup status: Knowing where we stand in a group enhances reactions to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 664-676
69. Van Prooijen J.-W., Van den Bos K., and Wilke H.A.M. Procedural justice in authority relations: The strength of outcome dependence influences people's reactions to voice. European Journal of Social Psychology 37 (2007) 1286-1297
70. Van Vugt M., Hogan R., and Kaiser R.B. Leadership, followership, and evolution. American Psychologist 63 (2008) 182-196
71. Zuckerman M., Porac J., Lathin D., Smith R., and Deci E.L. On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4 (1978) 443-446