Factor structure and measurement invariance of the cognitive failures questionnaire across the adult life span

Assessment

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 145-158

  Rast, Philippe ^a   Zimprich, Daniel ^a   Van Boxtel, Martin ^b   Jolles, Jellemer ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive failures; Factor structure; Life span; Measurement invariance; Ordered categorical

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTENTION; COGNITION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 65749111827     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: 15523489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1073191108324440     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Asparouhov, T. (2005). Sampling weights in latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidsiciplinary Journal, 12, 411-434. (Pubitemid 41311761) (Pubitemid 41311761)
2. Bauer, D.J. (2005). The role of nonlinear factor-to-indicator relationships in tests of measurement equivalence. Psychological Methods, 10, 305-316. (Pubitemid 41527951) (Pubitemid 41527951)
3. Bedard, M., Leonard, E., McAuliffe, J., Weaver, B., Gibbons, C., & Dubois, S. (2006). Visual attention and older drivers: The contribution of inhibition of return to safe driving. Experimental Aging Research, 32 (2). 119-135.
4. Bloem, R., & Schmuck, P. (1999). Individual differences in cognitive inhibition and their relation to failures of attention. Diagnostica, 45 (1). 47-55.
5. Bolla, K.I., Lindgren, K.-N., Bonaccorsy, C., & Bleecker, M.L. (1991). Memory complaints in older adults: Fact or fiction ? Archives of Neurology, 48 (1). 61-64.
6. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
7. Boomsma, D.I. (1998). Genetic analysis of cognitive failures (CFQ): A study of Dutch adolescent twins and their parents. European Journal of Personality, 12, 321-330. (Pubitemid 128151694) (Pubitemid 128151694)
8. Broadbent, D.E., Cooper, P.F., FitzGerald, P., & Parkes, K.R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21 (1). 1-16. (Pubitemid 12093480) (Pubitemid 12093480)
9. Browne, M.W. (1967). On oblique procrustes rotation. Psychometrika, 32 (2). 125-132.
10. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Cavanaugh, J.C., Feldman, J.M., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Memory beliefs as social cognition: A reconceptualization of what memory questionnaires assess. Review of General Psychology, 2 (1). 48-65. (Pubitemid 128553871) (Pubitemid 128553871)
12. Chen, F.F., Sousa, K.H., & West, S.G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 471-492. (Pubitemid 41311764) (Pubitemid 41311764)
13. Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold, R.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255.
14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Cudeck, R. (1989). Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317-327.
16. Derouesné, C., Lacomblez, L., Thibault, S., & LePoncin, M. (1999). Memory complaints in young and elderly subjects. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 291-301. (Pubitemid 29199575) (Pubitemid 29199575)
17. DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 327-346.
18. Floyd, F.J., & Widaman, K.F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
19. Gall, T.L., Evans, D.R., & Howard, J. (1997). The retirement process: Changes in the well-being of male retirees across time. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, 110-117. (Pubitemid 27240840) (Pubitemid 27240840)
20. García Martínez, J., & Sánchez-Cánovas, J. (1994). Adaptation of cognitive failures questionnaire by Broadbent, Cooper, Fitzgerald & Parkes. Analisis y Modificacion de Conducta, 20, 727-757.
21. Goldstein, H., & Healy, M.J.R. (1995). The graphical presentation of a collection of means. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 158A, 175-177.
22. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 356-388.
23. Heckhausen, J., Dixon, R.A., & Baltes, P.B. (1989). Gains and losses in development throughout adulthood as perceived by different adult age groups. Developmental Psychology, 25, 109-121.
24. Hertzog, C., & Hultsch, D.F. (2000). Metacognition in adulthood and old age. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2 nd ed., pp. 417-466). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Hertzog, C., Hultsch, D.F., & Dixon, R.A. (1998). Evidence for the convergent validity of two self-report metamemory questionnaires. Developmental Psychology, 25, 687-700.
26. Horn, J.L., & McArdle, J.J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18 (3). 117-144.
27. Jolles, J., Houx, P. J., van Boxtel, M. P. J., & Ponds, R. W. H. M. (Eds.). (1995). Maastricht aging study: Determinants of cognitive aging. Maastricht, Netherlands: Neuropsych.
28. Jones, G.V., & Martin, M. (2003). Individual differences in failing to save everyday computing work. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 861-868. (Pubitemid 39517285) (Pubitemid 39517285)
29. Klumb, P.L. (1995). Cognitive failures and performance differences: Validation studies of a German version of the cognitive failures questionnaire. Ergonomics, 38, 1456-1467.
30. Klumb, P.L. (2001). Tying knots in handkerchiefs: The use of memory aids in everyday life. Zeitschrift fur Entwicklungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie, 33, 42-49. (Pubitemid 33242974) (Pubitemid 33242974)
31. Larson, G.E., Alderton, D.L., Neideffer, M., & Underhill, E. (1997). Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the cognitive failures questionnaire. British Journal of Psychology, 88 (1). 29-38. (Pubitemid 127029584) (Pubitemid 127029584)
32. Larson, G.E., & Merritt, C.R. (1991). Can accidents be predicted? An empirical test of the cognitive failures questionnaire. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40 (1). 37-45.
33. Lineweaver, T.T., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Adults' efficacy and control beliefs regarding memory and aging: Separating general from personal beliefs. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 5, 264-296. (Pubitemid 29334722) (Pubitemid 29334722)
34. Lubke, G.H., Dolan, C.V., Kelderman, H., & Mellenbergh, G.J. (2003). On the relationship between sources of within- and between-group differences and measurement invariance in the common factor model. Intelligence, 31, 543-566. (Pubitemid 37221117) (Pubitemid 37221117)
35. Lubke, G.H., & Muthén, B.O. (2004). Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 514-534. (Pubitemid 39477205) (Pubitemid 39477205)
36. MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1 (2). 130-149. (Pubitemid 126672841) (Pubitemid 126672841)
37. MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4 (1). 84-99.
38. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & Hau, K.-T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling. Issues and techniques (pp. 315-353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Martin, M., & Zimprich, D. (2005). Cognitive development in midlife. In S. L. Willis & M. Martin (Eds.), Middle adulthood: A lifespan perspective (pp. 179-206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Matthews, G., Coyle, K., & Kraig, A. (1990). Multiple factors of cognitive failure and their relationship with stress vulnerability. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 12 (1). 49-65. (Pubitemid 20303691) (Pubitemid 20303691)
41. McDonald-Miszczak, L., Hertzog, C., & Hultsch, D.F. (1995). Stability and accuracy of metamemory in adulthood and aging: A longitudinal analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 553-564. (Pubitemid 26113153) (Pubitemid 26113153)
42. Meiran, N., Israeli, A., Levi, H., & Grafi, R. (1994). Individual differences in self-reported cognitive failures: The attention hypothesis revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 727-739.
43. Merckelbach, H., Muris, P., Nijman, H., & de Jong, P.J. (1996). Self-reported cognitive failures and neurotic symptomatology. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 715-724. (Pubitemid 126162228) (Pubitemid 126162228)
44. Merckelbach, H., Muris, P., & Rassin, E. (1999). Fantasy proneness and cognitive failures as correlates of dissociative experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 961-967.
45. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543. (Pubitemid 24754757) (Pubitemid 24754757)
46. Meredith, W., & Horn, J.L. (2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 203-240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47. Millsap, R.E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479-515. (Pubitemid 40031404) (Pubitemid 40031404)
48. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2004). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Author.
49. Norman, D.A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88 (1). 1-15.
50. Norman, D.A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 144-168). New York: Plenum.
51. Nuttman-Schwartz, O. (2004). Like a high wave: Adjustment to retirement. Gerontologist, 44, 229-236. (Pubitemid 38541826) (Pubitemid 38541826)
52. Pollina, L.K., Greene, A.L., Tunick, R.H., & Puckett, J.M. (1992). Dimensions of everyday memory in young adulthood. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 305-321.
53. Ponds, R.W.H.M., van Boxtel, M.P.J., & Jolles, J. (2000). Age-related changes in subjective cognitive functioning. Educational Gerontology, 26 (1). 67-81.
54. Preacher, K.J., & MacCallum, R.C. (2003). Repairing tom swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2 (1). 13-43.
55. Quick, H.E., & Moen, P. (1998). Gender, employment, and retirement quality: A life course approach to the differential experiences of men and women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3 (1). 44-46.
56. Reason, J. (1988). Stress and cognitive failure. In S. Fisher & J. Reason (Eds.), Handbook of life stress, cognition and health (pp. 405-421). New York: Wiley.
57. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Reason, J., & Lucas, D. (1984). Absent-mindedness in shops: Its incidence, correlates and consequences. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23 (2). 121-131. (Pubitemid 14115689) (Pubitemid 14115689)
59. Reise, S.P., Widaman, K.F., & Pugh, R.H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552-566.
60. Riby, L.M., Perfect, T.J., & Stollery, B.T. (2004). The effects of age and task domain on dual task performance: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 863-891. (Pubitemid 39506866) (Pubitemid 39506866)
61. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514. (Pubitemid 33570084) (Pubitemid 33570084)
63. Swaminathan, H., & Algina, J. (1978). Scale freeness in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 43, 581-583.
64. Tryon, W.W. (2001). Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychological Methods, 6, 371-386. (Pubitemid 33599065) (Pubitemid 33599065)
65. Vandenberg, R.J. (2002). Towards a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 139-159.
66. Vom Hofe, A., Mainemarre, G., & Vannier, L. (1998). Sensitivity to everyday failures and cognitive inhibition: Are they related ? European Review of Applied Psychology, 48, 49-55. (Pubitemid 128103074) (Pubitemid 128103074)
67. Wagle, A.C., Berrios, G.E., & Ho, L. (1999). The cognitive failures questionnaire in psychiatry. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 40, 478-484.
68. Wallace, J.C. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the cognitive failures questionnaire: Evidence for dimensionality and construct validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 307-324. (Pubitemid 38808636) (Pubitemid 38808636)
69. Wallace, J.C., Kass, S.J., & Stanny, C.J. (2002). The cognitive failures questionnaire revisited: Dimensions and correlates. Journal of General Psychology, 129, 238-256.
70. Wallace, J.C., & Vodanovich, S.J. (2003). Can accidents and industrial mishaps be predicted? Further investigation into the relationship between cognitive failure and reports of accidents. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 503-514. (Pubitemid 36550760) (Pubitemid 36550760)
71. Widaman, K.F., & Reise, S.P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance abuse domain. In K. J. Bryant & M. Windle (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advance from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281-324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
72. Zimprich, D., Allemand, M., & Hornung, R. (2006). Measurement invariance of the abridged sense of coherence scale in adolescence. European Journal of the Psychological Assessment, 22, 280-287.
73. Zimprich, D., Martin, M., & Kliegel, M. (2003). Subjective cognitive complaints, memory performance, and depressive affect in old age: A change-oriented approach. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 57, 339-366. (Pubitemid 38623659) (Pubitemid 38623659)
74. Zimprich, D., Perren, S., & Hornung, R. (2005). A two-level confirmatory factor analysis of a modified Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 465-481. (Pubitemid 40856005) (Pubitemid 40856005)