Optimization of a gastrointestinalmodel applicable to the evaluation of bioaccessibility in fish feeds

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 89, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1195-1201

  Hamdan, Mariam ^a   Moyano, Francisco J ^a   Schuhardt, Dominique ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

^b Instituto Canario de Ciencias Marinas   (Spain)

Author keywords

Fish; Gastrointestinal model; In vitro digestion; Protein

Indexed keywords

BOVIDAE;

EID: 65649126327     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3574     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Parada J and Aguilera JM, Food microstructure affects the bioavailability of several nutrients. J Food Sci 72:21-32 (2007). (Pubitemid 46392370)
2. Mounicou S, Szpunar J, Andrey D, Blake C and Lobinski R, Concentrations and bioavailability of cadmium and lead in cocoa powder and related products. Food Addit Contam 20:343-352 (2003). (Pubitemid 36656588)
3. Boissen S and Eggum BO, Critical evaluation of in vitro methods for estimating digestibility in simple stomach animals. Nutr Res Rev 4:141-162 (1991).
4. Dimes LE and Haard NF, Estimation of protein digestibility. I. Development of an in vitro method for estimating protein digestibility in salmonids. Comp Biochem Physiol 108A:349-362 (1994). (Pubitemid 24230175)
5. Bassompierre M, Kristiansen HR and McLean E, Influence of weight upon in vitro protein digestion in rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 52:213-216 (1998). (Pubitemid 28110971)
6. Carter CG, Bransden MP, Van Barneld RJ and Clarcke SM, Alternative methods for nutrition research on the southern bluefin tuna, Thunnus maccoyii: in vitro digestibility. Aquaculture 179:57-70 (1999). (Pubitemid 29404942)
7. Ezquerra JM, Enzyme technology in aquaculture: in vitro evaluation of enzymatic digestibility of dietary proteins by pH-stat for the optimization of diets for cultured Penaeus vannamei. Doctoral dissertation, CIBNOR, La Paz, BCS Mexico (1997).
8. García-Carre ̃no FL, Navarrete del Toro MA and Ezquerra M, Digestive shrimp proteinases for the evaluation of protein digestibility. I. The effect of proteinase inhibitors in protein ingredients. J Mar Biotechnol 5:36-40 (1997). (Pubitemid 127672156)
9. Alarcón FJ, Moyano FJ, Diaz M, Fernández-Diaz C and Yúfera M, optimización of the protein fraction of microcapsules used in feeding of marine fish larvae using in vitro digestibility techniques. Aquacult Nutr 5:107-113 (1999). (Pubitemid 129642906)
10. Buddington RK, Krogdahl A and Bakke-Mckellep AM, The intestines of carnivorous fish: structure and functions and the relationswith diet. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 638: 67-80 (1997). (Pubitemid 27492056)
11. Grabner Mand Hofer R, The digestibility of the proteins of broad bean (Vicia faba) and soya bean (Glycine max) under in vitro conditions simulating the alimentary tracts of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) and carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture 48:111-122 (1985).
12. Eid AE and Matty AJ, A simple in vitro method for measuring protein digestibility. Aquaculture 79:111-119 (1989).
13. Savoie L and Gauthier SF, Dialysis cell for the in vitro measurement of protein digestibility. J Food Sci 51:494-498 (1986).
14. Moyano Fj and Savoie L, Comparison of in vitro systems of protein digestion using either mammal or fish proteolytic enzymes. Comp Biochem Physiol A 128:359-368 (2001). (Pubitemid 32167181)
15. Walter HE, Proteinases:methods with hemoglobin, casein and azocoll as substrates, inMethodsofEnzymaticAnalysis, ed.byBergmeyer HJ. Verlag Chemie,Weinheim, pp. 270-277 (1984).
16. Anson ML, The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papain and cathepsin with haemoglobin. J Gen Physiol 22:79-89 (1938).
17. Church FC, Swaisgood HE, Porter DH and Catignani G, Spectrophotometric assay using o-phthaldehyde for determination of proteolysis in milk proteins. J Dairy Sci 66:1219-1227 (1983).
18. Robyt JF and Whelan WJ, The b-amylases, in Starch and its Derivatives, ed. by Radley JA. Academic Press, London, pp. 477-497 (1968).
19. Minekus M, Marteau P, Havenaar R and Huis in't Veld JHJ, A multi compartmental dynamic computer-controlled model simulating the stomach and small intestine. Altern Lab Anim 23:197-209 (1995).
20. Alarcón FJ, Moyano FJ and Díaz M, Evaluation of different protein sources for aquafeeds by an optimized pH-stat system. J Sci Food Agric 82:697-704 (2002). (Pubitemid 34514216)
21. Saunders RM, Conner MA, Booth AN, Bickoff EM and Kohler GO, Measurement of digestibility of alfalfa concentrates by in vivo and vitro methods. J Nutr 39:530-535 (1972).
22. TresherWC, Swaisgood HE and Catagnani GL, Digestibilities of the protein in various foods as determined in vitro by immobilized digestive enzyme assay (IDEA). Plants Foods Hum Nutr 39:59-65 (1989).
23. Wilfart A,Montagne L, Simmins PH, van Milgen J and Noblet J, Sites of nutrient digestion in growing pigs: effect of dietary fiber. J AnimSci 85:976-983 (2007). (Pubitemid 46651838)
24. Johnston J and Coon CN, The use of varying levels of pepsin for pepsin digestion studies with animal digestion studies with animal proteins. Poultry Sci 58:1271-1273 (1979).
25. Krogdahl A and Holm H, Soybean protease inhibitors and human proteolytic enzymes: selective inactivation of inhibitors by treatments with human gastric juice. J. Nutr 111:25-31 (1981).
26. Alarcón FJ, García-Carre ̃no FL and Navarrete del Toro MA, Effect of plant protease inhibitors on digestive proteases in two fish species, Lutjanus argentiventris and L. novemfasciatus. Fish Physiol Biochem 24:179-189 (2001). (Pubitemid 34182962)
27. Munilla-Morán R and Saborido-Rey F, Digestive enzymes in marine species. I. Proteinase activities in gut from redfish (Sebastes mentella), seabream (Sparus aurata) and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) Comp Biochem Physiol B 113:818-826 (1996). (Pubitemid 26186404)
28. Alarcón FJ, Díaz M, Moyano FJ and Abellán E, Characterization and functional properties of digestive proteases in two sparids: gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) andcommondentex (Dentex dentex). Fish Physiol Biochem 19:257-267 (1998). (Pubitemid 128510660)
29. Ijima N, Tanaka S and Ota Y, Purification and characterization of bile salt-activated lipase from the hepatopancreas of red sea bream, Pagrus major. Fish Physiol Biochem 18:59-69 (1998). (Pubitemid 128514115)
30. UneM, GotoT, KihiraK, KuramotoT, HagiwaraK, NakajimaT, et al, Isolation and identification of bile salts conjugated with cysteinolic acid from bile of the red seabream, Pagrosomus major. J Lipid Res 32:1619-1623 (1991).
31. Grosell M, O'Donnell MJ and Wood CM, Hepatic versus gallbladder bile composition: in vivo transport physiology of the gallbladder in rainbow trout. Am J Physiol 278:1674-1684 (2000). (Pubitemid 30439292)
32. Alam MS, Teshima S, Ishikawa M and Koshio S, Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on growth and digestive enzyme activities of Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus (Temminck & Schlegel). Aquacult Res 32:235-243 (2001). (Pubitemid 33757656)
33. Gass J, Vora H, Hofmann AF, Gray GM and Khosla C, Enhancement of dietary protein digestion by conjugated bile acids. Gastroenterology 133:16-23 (2007). (Pubitemid 47031127)
34. Marteau P, Minekus M, Havenaar R and Huis in't Veld JHJ, Survival of lactic acid bacteria in a dynamic model of the stomach and small intestine: validation and the effects of bile. JDairySci 80:1031-1037 (1997). (Pubitemid 127447084)
35. Uchida N, Tsukayama K and Nishide E, Purification and some properties of trypsins from the pyloric caeca of chum salmon (Oncorhyncus keta). Aquat Ecol 50:129-138 (1984).
36. Simpson BK and Haard NF, Purification and characterization of trypsin fromtheGreenlandcod(Gadusogac). 1. Kinetic andthermodynamic characteristic. Can J Biochem Cell Biol 62:894-900 (1984). (Pubitemid 15224391)
37. Guizani N, Rolle RS,Marshall MR and Wie CI, Isolation, purification and characterization of a trypsin from the pyloric caeca ofmullet (Mugil cephalus). Comp Biochem Physiol B 98:517-521 (1991).
38. Wolf BW, Bauer LL and Fahey GC, Effects of chemical modification on in vitro rate and extent of food starch digestion: an attempt to discover a slowly digested starch. J Agric Food Chem 47:4178-4183 (1999). (Pubitemid 29506221)
39. Muir JG and O'Dea K, The validation of an in vitro assay for predicting the amount of starch that escapes digestion in the small intestine of humans. Am J Clin Nutr 57:540-546 (1993). (Pubitemid 23096726)
40. Germaine KA, Samman S, Fryirs CG, Griffiths PJ, Johnson SK and Quail KJ, Comparison of in vitro starch digestibility methods for predicting the glycaemic index of grain foods. J Sci Food Agric 88:652-658 (2008).
41. Papoutsoglou ES and Lyndon AR, Effect of incubation temperature on carbohydrate digestion in important teleosts for aquaculture. Aquacult Res 36:1252-1264 (2005). (Pubitemid 41391270)
42. Bassompierre M, Borresen T, Sandfeld P,Ronsholdt B,Zimmermann W and Mclean E, An evaluation of open a closed systems for in vitro protein digestion of fish meal. Aquacult Nutr 3:153-159 (1997). (Pubitemid 127500087)
43. Mabjeesh SJ, Cohen M and Arieli A, In vitro methods for measuring the dry matter digestibility of ruminant feedstuffs: comparison of methods and inoculum source. J Dairy Sci 83:2289-2294 (2000).