How sustainable are biofuels? Answers and further questions arising from an ecological footprint perspective

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 100, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 3825-3830

  Stoeglehner, Gernot ^a   Narodoslawsky, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Decision making; Ecological footprint; Sustainable energy supplies

Indexed keywords

BIOFUEL PRODUCTIONS; CALCULATION METHODS; DECISION-MAKING PROCESS; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; ENVIRONMENTAL PRESSURES; FOOTPRINTING; FORESTRY PRODUCTS; INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES; LAND AREAS; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SUPPLIES;

AGRICULTURE; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; ENERGY CONSERVATION; FOSSIL FUELS;

BIOFUELS;

BIOFUEL; FOSSIL FUEL;

BIOFUEL; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; NATURE CONSERVATION; SUSTAINABILITY;

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; LIFE CYCLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AUSTRIA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; ENERGY-GENERATING RESOURCES; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 65649124237     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.059     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ayres R.U. Commentary on the utility of the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics 32 (2000) 357-358
2. Bicknell K.B., Ball R.J., Cullen R., and Bigsby H.R. New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy. Ecological Economics 27 (1998) 149-160
3. Birnstingl, B. et al., 2007. Endbericht des Projektes Landwirtschaft 2020, Program energy systems of tomorrow, .
4. Brehmer B., Struik P.C., and Sanders J. Using an energetic and exergetic life cycle analysis to assess the best application of legumes within a biobased economy. Biomass and Bioenergy 32 (2008) 1175-1186
5. Catic I., and Rujnic-Sokele M. Agriculture products - food for living beings or for machinery. Gummi Fasern Kunststoffe 61 11 (2008) 701-708
6. Eder P., and Narodoslawsky M. What environmental pressures are a region's industries responsible for? A method of analysis with descriptive input/output models. Ecological Economics 29 (1999) 359-374
7. EU-Biofuel-Directive. 2003. Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport. Official Journal of the European Union L123/42-46 of 17.5.03.
8. Ferng J.J. Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints. Ecological Economics 40 (2002) 53-69
9. forschung planung beratung: Regionales Energiekonzept Freistadt, Wien 1997.
10. Gwehenberger, G., Narodoslawsky, M., Liebmann, B., Friedl, A., 2007. Ecology of scale versus economy of scale of bioethanol production. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 1. doi: 10.1002/bbb.35.
11. Haberl H., Erb K., and Krausmann F. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995. Ecological Economics 18 1 (2001) 25-45
12. Harrison, J.R., 2003. The Carbon Cycle: What Goes Around Comes Around. Visionlearning, vol. EAS-2 (3), .
13. Hellegers P., Zilbermann D., Stedto P., and McCornick P. Interactions between water, energy, food and environment: evolving perspectives and policy issues. Water Policy 10 (2008) 1-10
14. Hellmann, F., Verburg P.H., 2008. Spatially explicit modelling of biofuel crops in Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.09.003.
15. Holzman D.C. The carbon footprint of biofuels can we shrink it down to size in time?. Environmental Health Perspectives 6 (2008) 116
16. Kim S., and Dale B.E. Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass and Bioenergy 29 (2005) 426-439
17. Krotscheck C., and Narodoslawsky M. The Sustainable process index. A new dimension in ecological evaluation. Ecological Engineering 6 (1996) 241-258
18. Lenzen M., and Murray S.A. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia. Ecological Economics 37 (2001) 229-255
19. Luo, L., v.d. Voet, E., Huppes, G., in press. Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugar cane in Brazil, Renew Sustain Energy Reviews. doi:10.1016/j.resr.2008.09.024.
20. McDonald G.W., and Patterson M.G. Ecological footprints and interdependencies of New Zealand regions. Ecological Economics 50 (2004) 49-57
21. Medved S. Present and future ecological footprint of Slovenia - the influence of energy demand scenarios. Ecological Modelling 192 (2006) 26-36
22. Moffat I. Ecological footprints and sustainable development. Ecological Economics 32 (2000) 359-362
23. Monfreda C., Wackernagel M., and Deumling D. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy 21 (2004) 231-246
24. Renouf M.A., Wegener M.K., and Nielsen L.K. An environmental life cycle assessment comparing Australian sugarcane with US corn and UK sugar beet as producers of sugars for fermentation. Biomass and Bioenergy 32 (2008) 1144-1155
25. Stoeglehner, G., Narodoslawsky, M., 2007. Applying ecological footprinting in decision making processes on future local and regional energy supplies. In: Center for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society, University of Cardiff, Stepping Up the Pace. New Developments in Ecological Footprinting Methodology, Policy and Practice, 8-10 Mai 2007, Cardiff. .
26. Stoeglehner G., and Narodoslawsky M. Implementing ecological footprinting in decision-making processes. Land Use Policy 25 (2008) 421-431
27. Stoeglehner G., Levy J.K., and Neugebauer G.C. Improving the ecological footprint of nuclear energy: a risk-based lifecycle assessment approach for critical infrastructure systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures 1 4 (2005) 394-403
28. Stöglehner G. Ecological footprint - a tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies. Journal of Cleaner Production 11 2003 (2003) 267-277
29. Su Ch.L., and Lee Y.M. Development status and life cycle inventory analysis of biofuels in Taiwan. Energy Policy 37 (2009) 754-758
30. Talens L., Villablba G., and Gabarrell X. Exergy analysis applied to biodiesel production. Resources Conversion and Recycling 51 (2007) 397-407
31. van Vuuren D.P., and Smeets E.M.W. Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 34 (2000) 115-130
32. Wackernagel, M., Rees, W., 1993. How Big is Our Ecological Footprint - a Handbook for Estimating a Community's Carrying Capacity, Vancouver.
33. Wackernagel M., and Rees W. Unser ökologischer Fußabdruck - Wie der Mensch Einfluss auf die Umwelt nimmt (1997), Birkhäuser, Basel
34. Wackernagel M., Onisto L., Bello P., Callejas Linares A., López Falfán I.S., Méndez García J., Suárez Guerrero A.I., and Suárez Guerrero G. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics 29 (1999) 375-390
35. Wiedmann T., Minx J., Barrett J., and Wackernagel M. Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis. Ecological Economics 56 (2006) 28-48
36. Wood R., and Lenzen M. An application of a modified ecological footprint method and structural path analysis in a comparative institutional study. Local Environment 8 4 (2003) 365-386