Present and future ecological footprint of Slovenia - The influence of energy demand scenarios

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 192, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 25-36

  Medved, Sašo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Biological capacity; Ecological footprint; Energy demand scenarios; Slovenia; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

ENERGY CONSERVATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BIOLOGICAL CAPACITY; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ENERGY DEMAND SCENARIOS; SLOVENIA;

ECOLOGY;

ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ENERGY USE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SLOVENIA; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 31544439863     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. N. Chambers, C. Simmons, and M. Wachernagel Sharing Nature's Interest - Ecological Footprints as an Inducator of Sustainability 2000 Earthscan Publication Ltd London, UK 1-85383-739-3
2. Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2002.
3. Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2001.
4. Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2003.
5. H. Haberl, K.-H. Erb, and F. Krauusmann How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long period of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995 Ecol. Econ. 38 1995 25 45
6. H. Haberl, K.-H. Erb, F. Krauusmann, H. Adensam, and N. Schulz Land-use change and socioeconomics metabolism in Austria. Part II. Land-use scenarios for 2020 LAnd Use Policy 20 1 2003 21 39
7. IWM, 2002. Institution of Waste Management Environmental Body; City Limits - A Resource Flow and Ecological Footprint Analysis of Great London, http://www.citylimitslondon.com (7.4.2003).
8. B. Lomborg The Skeptical Environmentalist 2001 Cambridge University Press UK 0-521-01068-3
9. S. Medved Program of Renewable Sources Exploitation 2001 University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Ljubljana
10. MG The National Energy Resolution 2003 The Ministry of the Economy Ljubljana, Slovenia
11. C. Monfreda, M. Wackernagel, and D. Deumling Establishing National Natural Capital Accounts Based on Detailed Ecological Footprint and Biological Capacity Assessments, Land Use Policy 2003 Elsevier Press pp. 1-2
12. MOP The Environment Protecton Act 2003 The Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning Ljubljana, Slovenia
13. NRDC, 2004. To Good to Throw Away, Natural Resources Defence Council, http://www.nrdc.org (26.9.2003).
14. RP, Redefining Progress; http://www.redefiningprogress.org (26.9.2003).
15. G. Stöglehner Ecological footprint - a tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies J. Clean. Prod. 11 2003 267 277
16. SYRS Statistical Yearbook of the Republic Slovenia 2002 Statistical Office of Republic Slovenia Ljubljana, Slovenia
17. Viridis, 2002. Ecological Footprint Analysis pf Scottish Cities, http://www.scotlands-footprint.com (7.5.2003).
18. M. Wackernagel, and W.E. Rees Our Ecological Footprint, Reducing Human Impact on the Earth 1996 New Society Publishers 1-55092-251-3
19. M. Wackernagel The ecological footprint of Santiago de Chile Local Environ. 3 1 1998 7 25
20. WCED World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future 1987 Oxford Press Oxford
21. WWF, 2003. The Global Conservation Organization, http://www.panda.org (5.1.2003).
22. S. Zhao, Z. Li, and W. Li A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application Ecol. Model. 185 2005 65 75
23. Žun Ecological Follow-up of the Development of Local Communities, Master Degree Work 2004 University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Ljubljana, Slovenia