Motion streaks in fast motion rivalry cause orientation-selective suppression

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Apthorp, Deborah ^a   Wenderoth, Peter ^b   Alais, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Masking; Motion 2D; Perceptual organization

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 65649116915     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.5.10     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (2005). Binocular rivalry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Alais, D., & Melcher, D. (2007). Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Research, 47, 269-279.
3. Alais, D., & Parker, A. (2006). Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form. Neuron, 52, 911-920.
4. Albright, T. D. (1984). Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 52, 1106-1130.
5. Apthorp, D., & Alais, D. (2009). Tilt aftereffects and tilt illusions induced by fast translational motion: Evidence for motion streaks. Journal of Vision, 9(1):27, 1-11, http://journalofvision.org/9/ 1/27/, doi:10.1167/9.1.27.
6. Bair, W., & Movshon, J. A. (2004). Adaptive temporal integration of motion in direction-selective neurons in macaque visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 7305-7323.
7. Bex, P. J., Edgar, G. K., & Smith, A. T. (1995). Sharpening of drifting, blurred images. Vision Research, 35, 2539-2546.
8. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145-167.
9. Blake, R., & Boothroyd, K. (1985). The precedence of binocular fusion over binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 114-124.
10. Blake, R., & Camisa, J. (1979). On the inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 315-323.
11. Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974). Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. Vision Research, 14, 687-692.
12. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
13. Blake, R., Zimba, L., & Williams, D. (1985). Visual motion, binocular correspondence and binocular rivalry. Biological Cybernetics, 52, 391-397.
14. Bonds, A. B. (1989). Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 2, 41-55.
15. Born, R. T., & Bradley, D. C. (2005). Structure and function of visual area MT. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 157-189.
16. Braddick, O. J., Campbell, F. W., & Atkinson, J. (1978). Channels in vision: Basic aspects. In R. Held, H. Leibowitz, & H.-L. Teuber (Eds.), Perception (vol. VII, pp. 3-7). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
17. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
18. Britten, K. H., & Newsome, W. T. (1998). Tuning bandwidths for near-threshold stimuli in area MT. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 762-770.
19. Burr, D. (1980). Motion smear. Nature, 284, 164-165.
20. Burr, D. (2000). Motion vision: Are 'speed lines' used in human visual motion? Current Biology, 10, R440-R443.
21. Burr, D. C., & Morgan, M. J. (1997). Motion deblurring in human vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 264, 431-436.
22. Burr, D. C., & Ross, J. (2002). Direct evidence that "speedlines" influence motion mechanisms. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 8661-8664.
23. Carandini, M., & Ringach, D. L. (1997). Predictions of a recurrent model of orientation selectivity. Vision Research, 37, 3061-3071.
24. Chen, S., Bedell, H. E., & Oǧmen, H. (1995). A target in real motion appears blurred in the absence of other proximal moving targets. Vision Research, 35, 2315-2328.
25. Clifford, C. W., & Harris, J. A. (2005). Contextual modulation outside of awareness. Current Biology, 15, 574-578.
26. Cropper, S. J., & Badcock, D. R. (2008). Perception of direction of motion reflects the early integration of first and second-order stimulus spatial properties. Journal of Vision, 8(4):12, 1-10, http://journalofvision.org/8/4/12/, doi:10.1167/8.4.12.
27. De Valois, R. L., Yund, E. W., & Hepler, N. (1982). The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Research, 22, 531-544.
28. DeYoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 11, 219-226.
29. Di Lollo, V., & Hogben, J. H. (1987). Suppression of visible persistence as a function of spatial separation between inducing stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 345-354.
30. Edwards, M., & Crane, M. F. (2007). Motion streaks improve motion detection. Vision Research, 47, 828-833.
31. Fox, R., & Check, R. (1972). Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 283-289.
32. Fox, R., Todd, S., & Bettinger, L. A. (1975). Optokinetic nystagmus as an objective indicator of binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 15, 849-853.
33. Francis, G., & Grossberg, S. (1996). Cortical dynamics of form and motion integration: Persistence, apparent motion, and illusory contours. Vision Research, 36, 149-173.
34. Geisler, W. S. (1999). Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction. Nature, 400, 65-69.
35. Geisler, W. S., Albrecht, D. G., Crane, A. M., & Stern, L. (2001). Motion direction signals in the primary visual cortex of cat and monkey. Visual Neuroscience, 18, 501-516.
36. Georgeson, M. A., & Hammett, S. T. (2002). Seeing blur: 'Motion sharpening' without motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1429-1434.
37. Giese, M. A. (1999). Evidence for multi-functional interactions in early visual motion processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 22, 287-290.
38. Graham, N. V. S. (1989). Visual pattern analysers. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Gur, M., Kagan, I., & Snodderly, D. M. (2005). Orientation and direction selectivity of neurons in V1 of alert monkeys: Functional relationships and laminar distributions. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1207-1221.
40. Hammett, S. T., Georgeson, M. A., & Gorea, A. (1998). Motion blur and motion sharpening: Temporal smear and local contrast non-linearity. Vision Research, 38, 2099-2108.
41. Hart, W. M., Jr. (1987). The temporal responsiveness of vision. In R. A. Moses & W. M. Hart (Eds.), Adler's physiology of the eye, clinical application (pp. 429-457). St. Louis, MO: The C. V. Mosby Company.
42. He, S., & MacLeod, D. I. (2001). Orientation-selective adaptation and tilt after-effect from invisible patterns. Nature, 411, 473-476.
43. Hogben, J. H., & Di Lollo, V. (1985). Suppression of visible persistence in apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 450-460.
44. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in cat's visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 160, 106-154.
45. Knapen, T., Kanai, R., Brascamp, J., van Boxtel, J., & van Ee, R. (2007). Distance in feature space determines exclusivity in visual rivalry. Vision Research, 47, 3269-3275.
46. Kourtzi, Z. (2004). "But still, it moves". Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 47-49.
47. Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 48-55.
48. Kourtzi, Z., Krekelberg, B., & van Wezel, R. J. (2008). Linking form and motion in the primate brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 230-236.
49. Krekelberg, B., Dannenberg, S., Hoffmann, K. P., Bremmer, F., & Ross, J. (2003). Neural correlates of implied motion. Nature, 424, 674-677.
50. Li, D. F., Freeman, A. W., & Alais, D. (2005). Contrast sensitivity of form and motion discrimination during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 45, 1255-1263.
51. Ling, S., & Blake, R. (2008). Suppression during binocular rivalry broadens orientation tuning [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):246, 246a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/246/, doi:10.1167/ 8.6.246.
52. Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740-749.
53. Lorenceau, J., & Shiffrar, M. (1992). The influence of terminators on motion integration across space. Vision Research, 32, 263-273.
54. Makous, W., & Sanders, R. K. (1978). Suppression interactions between fused patterns. In A. C. Armington, J. Krauskopf & B. R. Wooten (Eds.), Visual pyschophysics and physiology (pp. 167-179). New York: Academic Press.
55. Moutoussis, K., Keliris, G., Kourtzi, Z., & Logothetis, N. (2005). A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain. Vision Research, 45, 2231-2243.
56. Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Alais, D. (2003). Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research, 43, 2003-2008.
57. Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Wenderoth, P. (2001). The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 348-360.
58. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2005). Suppressed patterns alter vision during binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 15, 2142-2148.
59. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
60. Ringach, D. L., Bredfeldt, C. E., Shapley, R. M., & Hawken, M. J. (2002). Suppression of neural responses to nonoptimal stimuli correlates with tuning selectivity in macaque V1. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 1018-1027.
61. Ringach, D. L., Shapley, R. M., & Hawken, M. J. (2002). Orientation selectivity in macaque V1: Diversity and laminar dependence. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 5639-5651.
62. Ross, J., Badcock, D. R., & Hayes, A. (2000). Coherent global motion in the absence of velocity signals. Current Biology, 10, 679-682.
63. Senior, C., Barnes, J., Giampietro, V., Simmons, A., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M., et al. (2000). The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or representational momentum. Current Biology, 10, 16-22.
64. Sincich, L. C., & Horton, J. C. (2005). The circuitry of V1 and V2: Integration of color, form, and motion. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 303-326.
65. Snowden, R. J., & Braddick, O. J. (1989). The combination of motion signals over time. Vision Research, 29, 1621-1630.
66. Snowden, R. J., Treue, S., & Andersen, R. A. (1992). The response of neurons in areas V1 and MT of the alert rhesus monkey to moving random dot patterns. Experimental Brain Research, 88, 389-400.
67. Somers, D. C., Nelson, S. B., & Sur, M. (1995). An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 5448-5465.
68. Tong, J., Aydin, M., & Bedell, H. E. (2007). Direction and extent of perceived motion smear during pursuit eye movement. Vision Research, 47, 1011-1019.
69. Treue, S., Husain, M., & Andersen, R. A. (1991). Human perception of structure from motion. Vision Research, 31, 59-75.
70. van de Grind, W. A., van Hof, P., van der Smagt, M. J., & Verstraten, F. A. (2001). Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 437-443.
71. Wade, N. J., de Weert, C. M., & Swanston, M. T. (1984). Binocular rivalry with moving patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 111-122.
72. Wiesenfelder, H., & Blake, R. (1992). Binocular rivalry suppression disrupts recovery from motion adaptation. Visual Neuroscience, 9, 143-148.
73. Winawer, J., Huk, A. C., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). A motion aftereffect from still photographs depicting motion. Psychological Science, 19, 276-283.
74. Zeki, S., Watson, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1993). Going beyond the information given: The relation of illusory visual motion to brain activity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 252, 215-222.