But still, it moves

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 47-49

  Kourtzi, Zoe ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; PAINTING; PHOTOGRAPHY;

NEURAL MECHANISMS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ART; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN; INFORMATION; INTEGRATION; MONKEY; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; OBSERVATION; PAINTING; PHOTOGRAPHY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW;

EID: 0842305025     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.001     Document Type: Short Survey

References (25)

1. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual streams. Ingle D.J., et al. Analysis of Visual Behavior. 1982;549-586 MIT Press.
2. Albright T.D. Cortical processing of visual motion. Rev. Oculomot. Res. 5:1993;177-201.
3. Watson J.D.G., et al. Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb. Cortex. 3:1993;79-94.
4. Logothetis N.K., Sheinberg D.L. Visual object recognition. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19:1996;577-621.
5. Grill-Spector K., et al. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res. 41:2001;1409-1422.
6. Krekelberg B., et al. Neural correlates of implied motion. Nature. 424:2003;674-677.
7. Glass L. Moire effect from random dots. Nature. 223:1969;578-580.
8. Ross J., et al. Coherent global motion in the absence of coherent velocity signals. Curr. Biol. 10:2000;679-682.
9. Koffka K. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. 1935;Harcourt, Brace and Co.
10. Kourtzi Z., Shiffrar M. One-shot view-invariance in a moving world. Psychol. Sci. 8:1997;461-466.
11. Knappmeyer B., et al. The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity. Vision Res. 43:2003;1921-1936.
12. Freyd J.J. Dynamic mental representations. Psychol. Rev. 94:1987;427-438.
13. Geisler W.S. Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction. Nature. 400:1999;65-69.
14. Burr D.C., Ross J. Direct evidence that 'speedlines' influence motion mechanisms. J. Neurosci. 22:2002;8661-8664.
15. Kim H., Francis G. A computational and perceptual account of motion lines. Perception. 27:1998;785-797.
16. Shiffrar M., Freyd J.J. Apparent motion of the human body. Psychol. Sci. 1:1990;257-264.
17. Braddick O.J., et al. Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain. Curr. Biol. 10:2000;731-734.
18. Bradley D.C., et al. Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons. Nature. 392:1998;714-717.
19. Kourtzi Z., et al. Object-selective responses in the human motion area MT/MST. Nat. Neurosci. 5:2002;17-18.
20. Zeki S., et al. Going beyond the information given: the relation of illusory visual motion to brain activity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 252:1993;215-222.
21. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Activation in human MT/MST for static images with implied motion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:2000;48-55.
22. Senior C., et al. The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or representational momentum. Curr. Biol. 10:2000;16-22.
23. Smith M.A., et al. Signals in macaque striate cortical neurons that support the perception of Glass patterns. J. Neurosci. 22:2002;8334-8345.
24. Jellema T., Perrett D.I. Cells in monkey STS responsive to articulated body motions and consequent static posture: a case of implied motion? Neuropsychologia. 41:2003;1728-1737.
25. Williams Z.M., et al. Parietal activity and the perceived direction of ambiguous apparent motion. Nat. Neurosci. 6:2003;616-623.