Metacognition and self-regulation in literacy

Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 215-239

  Schreiber, Fredric J ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65649109538     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613301     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Anderson, G. S. (1984). A whole language approach to reading. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
2. Armbruster, B. B., Echols, C. H., & Brown, A. L. (1982). The role of metacognition in reading to learn: A developmental perspective. Volta Review, 84(5), 45-56.
3. Artelt, C., Schiefele, U., & Schneider, W. (2001). Predictors of reading literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(3), 363-383.
4. Artzt, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 137-175.
5. August, D. L., Flavell, J. H., & Clift, R. (1984). Comparison of comprehension monitoring of skilled and less skilled readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(1), 39-53.
6. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
7. Baumann, J. F. (1984). The effectiveness of a direct instruction paradigm for teaching main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(1), 93-115.
8. Bawden, R., & Duffy, G. G. (1979, April). Teacher conceptions of reading and the impact on instructional behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, Atlanta, GA.
9. Borkowski, J. G., Ryan, E. B., Kurtz, B. E., & Reid, M. K. (1983). Metamemory and metalinguistic development: Correlates of children's intelligence and achievement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21(5), 393-396.
10. Borkowski, J. G., Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1989). The challenges of teaching good information processing to learning disabled students. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 36(3), 169-185.
11. Brown, A. L. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14-21.
12. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 18-37.
14. Bruce, M. E. (1991). Reciprocal teaching and transenvironmental programming: A program to facilitate the reading comprehension of students with reading difficulties. RASE: Remedial and Special Education, 12(5), 44-54.
15. Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, I. D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5-23.
16. Cooper, J. M. (1998). An exploratory study of the metacognition of verbally gifted/learning disabled learners with and without reading disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 58(12-A), 45-59.
17. Cox, C. (1983). Learning to read, reading to learn: An interview with Jeanne S. Chall. Curriculum Review, 22(5), 11-15.
18. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing, 14(5-6), 549-568.
19. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22(1-2), 8-15.
20. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van De Ven, A. (2001). Improving text comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: A design experiment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(4), 531-559.
21. Decker, B. C., & Sullivan, B. W. (1990). Metacognitive reading strategies for diploma seeking special education students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 17(3), 107-117.
22. Dickson, S. V., Collins, V. L., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (1998). Metacognitive strategies: Instructional and curricular bases and implications. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kame'enui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (pp. 361-380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Forrest-Pressley, D., Waller, T. G., & Pressley, M. (1989). Forrest-Pressley and Waller (1984) concluded that metacognition about reading is related to reading performance: A comment about Jacobs and Paris (1987). Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 207-210.
25. Garner, R. (1981). Monitoring ofpassage inconsistency among poor comprehenders: A preliminary test of the "Piecemeal Processing" explanation. Journal of Educational Research, 74(3), 159-162.
26. Garner, R. (1987a). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Garner, R. (1987b). Strategies for reading and studying expository text. Educational Psychologist, 23(3-4), 299-312.
28. Garner, R. (1988). Metacognition and reading comprehension (2nd ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29. Goodman, K. S. (1994). Reading, writing, and written texts: A transactional sociopsycho-linguistic view. InR. B. Ruddell (Ed.), Theoretical models andprocesses of reading (4th ed., pp. 1093-1130). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
30. Grigorenko, E. L. (1999). Heredity versus environment as the basis of cognitive ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition (pp. 665-696). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Guthrie, J. T. (1982). Research views: Metacognition: Up from flexibility. Reading Teacher, 35(4), 510-512.
32. Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3-4), 255-278.
33. King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 307-317.
34. Lederer, J. M. (1997). Reciprocal teaching of social studies in elementary classrooms. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 58(1-A), 0073.
35. Mosenthal, P. (1977). Children's metacognitive reproductive and reconstructive comprehension in listening, reading silently, and reading aloud: A problem of psychosocial development. Paper presented at the 27 th annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, New Orleans, LA.
36. Mosenthal, P., Walmsley, S., & Allington, R. (1978). Word recognition reconsidered: Toward a multi-context model. Visible Language, 12(4), 448-68.
37. Myers, M., & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(5), 680-690.
38. National Reading Panel (NRP). (2000). Report ofthe NationalReadingPanel. Teachingchildren to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In A. C. Graesser (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125-173). New York: Academic Press.
40. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, D. A. (1987). Enhancing instructional time through attention to metacognition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(2), 66-75.
41. Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55(6), 2083-2093.
42. Pearson, P. D., Roehler, L. R., Dole, J.A., & Duffy, G.G. (1992). Developing expertise in reading comprehension. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 145-199). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
43. Piaget, J. (1971). The epigenetic system and the development of cognitive functions. In M. H. Johnson (Ed.), Brain development and cognition: A reader (pp. 31-38). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
44. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Pressley, M., El Dinary, P. B., Wharton McDonald, R., & Brown, R. (1998). Transactional instruction of comprehension strategies in the elementary grades. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self regulated learning: From teaching to self reflective practice (pp. 42-56). New York: Guilford.
46. Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., & McGoldrick, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text. Elementary School Journal, 90(1), 3-32.
47. Probst, R. E. (1987). Transactional theory in the teaching of literature. ERIC Digest. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
48. Reeve, R. A., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition reconsidered: Implications for intervention research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 13, 343-356.
49. Riccio, C. A., & Hynd, G. W. (2000). Measurable biological substrates to verbal-performance differences in Wechsler scores. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(4), 386-399.
50. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1969). Towards a transactional theory of reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1(1), 31-49.
51. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1970). Literature as exploration. London: Heinemann.
52. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1994). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. B. Ruddell (Ed.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 1057-1092). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
53. Rosenshine, B. (1978, March). Instructional principles in direct instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting, American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada.
54. Rubman, C.N., & Salatas Waters, H. (2000). A,B seeing: The role of constructive processes in children's comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 503-514.
55. Sandak, R., Mencl, W., Frost, S. J., & Pugh, K. R. (2004). The neurobiological basis of skilled and impaired reading: Recent findings and new directions. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(3), 273-292.
56. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113-125.
57. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
58. Schwartz, S. (1988). A comparison of componential and traditional approaches to training reading skills. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2(3), 189-201.
59. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568.
60. Silven, M., & Vauras, M. (1992). Improving reading through thinking aloud. Learning and Instruction, 2(2), 69-88.
61. Simmons, D.C., Baker, J., Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (1995). Teacher-directed reading instruction in the mainstream: A call for instructional reform. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 11(1), 19-36.
62. Slavin, R. E., & Tanner, A. M. (1979). Effects of cooperative reward structures and individual accountability on productivity and learning. Journal of Educational Research, 72(5), 294-298.
63. Slife, B. D., & Weaver, C. A. (1992). Depression, cognitive skill, and metacognitive skill in problem solving. Cognition and Emotion, 6(1), 1-22.
64. St. John, E. P., Loescher, S. A., & Bardzell, J. S. (2003). Improving reading and literacy in grades 1-5: A resource guide to research-based programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65. Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10(1), 72-100.
66. Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. In Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
67. Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 128-158.
68. Tregaskes, M. R., & Daines, D. (1989). Effects of metacognitive strategies on reading comprehension. Reading Research and Instruction, 29(1), 52-60.
69. Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., & Bryant, D. P. (2001). Collaborative strategic reading as a means to enhance peer-mediated instruction for reading comprehension and content-area learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(2), 66-74.
70. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. J.-S. Cole, Vera; Scribner, Sylvia; Souberman, Ellen (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71. Wiener, M., & Cromer, W. (1967). Reading and reading difficulty: A conceptual analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 37(4), 620-643.
72. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker (Ed.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73. Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of selfregulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.
74. Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.), Handbook of self regulation (pp. 749-768). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
75. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.
76. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217-221.
77. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Selfregulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). New York: Guilford.
78. Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 29-36.
79. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 289-307). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.