Moderation as judgement practice: Reconciling system level accountability and local level practice

Curriculum Perspectives

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 10-28

  Klenowski, Val ^a   Adie, Lenore ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65649100064     PISSN: 01597868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adult Community and Further Education Board (1994). Moderation in the certificates of general education for adults: Guidelines for providers. Melbourne, Australia: Council of Adult Education.
2. Assessment Reform Group (2002). Testing, motivation and learning. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Department of Education.
3. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2005). Lessons from around the world: How policies, politics and cultures constrain and afford assessment practices. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), pp. 249-261.
4. Broadfoot, P. & Black, P. (2004). Redefining assessment? The first ten years of Assessment in Education. Assessment in Education, 11(1), pp. 8-27.
5. Cumming, J.J., Wyatt-Smith, CM., Elkins, J. & Neville, M. (2006). Teacher judgment: Building an evidentiary base for quality literacy and numeracy education. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Studies Authority.
6. Elwood, J. (2006). Formative assessment: Possibilities, boundaries and limitations. Assessment in Education, 13(2), pp. 215-232.
7. Elwood, J. & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(3), pp. 243-256.
8. EPPI-Centre (2006). Summative assessment: Assessment by teachers. Retrieved 26 November 2007 from http://eppi. ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid= 617
9. Gipps, CV. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educa- tional assessment. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
10. Harlen, W. (2004a). A systematic review of the evidence of reliability and validity of assessment be teachers used for summative purposes. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
11. Harlen, W. (2004b). A systematic review of the evidence of the impact on students, teachers and the curriculum of the process of using assessment by teachers for summative purposes. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
12. Harlen, W. (2005a). Teachers' summative practices and assessment for learning -tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), pp. 207-223.
13. Harlen, W. (2005b). Trusting teachers' judgement: Research evidence of the reliability and validity of teachers' assessment used for summative purposes. Research Papers in Education, 20(3), pp. 245-270.
14. Hutchinson, C. & Hayward, L. (2005). The journey so far: Assessment for learning in Scotland. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), pp. 225-248.
15. Ingvarson, L. (1990). Enhancing professional skill and accounta- bility in the assessment of student learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
16. James, M. (2006). Assessment, teaching and theories of learning, in J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (pp. 47-60). London, UK: Sage Publications.
17. James, M. & Conner, C. (1992). Moderation at Key Stage One across four LEAs 1992. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Institute of Education.
18. Klenowski, V. (2002). Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
19. Klenowski, V. (2006). Evaluation report of the pilot of the 2005 Queensland Assessment Task (QAT). Retrieved 28 October 2007 from http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/research/reports. html
20. Klenowski, V. (2007). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the consensus-based standards validation process [electronic version]. Retrieved 30 October 2007 from http:// education.qld.gov.au/corporate/newbasics/html/lce- eval. html
21. Klenowski, V., Askew, S. & Carnell, E. (2006). Portfolios for learning, assessment and professional development in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), pp. 267-286.
22. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Linn, R.L. (1993). Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(1), pp. 83-102.
24. Luke, A. (2003). After the marketplace: Evidence, social science and educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 30(2), pp. 87-107.
25. Malone, L., Long, K. & De Lucchi, L. (2004). All things in moderation. Science and Children, 41(5), pp. 30-34.
26. Matters, G. (2006). Statistical moderation and social moderation around Australia. Paper presented at the International Association for Educational Assessment Conference.
27. Maxwell, G. (2001). Moderation of assessments in vocational education and training. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Government. Department of Employment and Training.
28. Maxwell, G. (2002). Moderation of teacher judgements in student assessment: Discussion paper on assessment and reporting. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland School Curriculum Council.
29. Messick, S. (1989). Validity, in R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd edition, pp. 13-103). New York, USA: Macmillan.
30. New South Wales Department of Education and Training (2007). Consistent teacher judgements in action: A resource for schools. Retrieved 28 November 2007 from http:// www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/consistent -teacher/index.htm
31. New Zealand Qualifications Authority (2007). Consultation on the reviewed Good Practice Guidelines for the Moderation of Standards Based Assessment document. Retrieved 23 March 2008 from http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/for-providers/ resources/ docs/sba-mod-guidelines-consult.pdf
32. Queensland. Department of Education Training and the Arts (2002). The Report of the Assessment and Reporting Taskforce. Brisbane, Australia: The State of Queensland Department of Education.
33. Queensland. Department of Education Training and the Arts (2003). Growing an assessment culture: Overview of the assessment and reporting agenda 2002-2006. Brisbane, Australia: The State of Queensland.
34. Queensland Studies Authority (2007a). Information statement April 2007: Standards draft 2. Brisbane, Australia: Author.
35. Queensland Studies Authority (2007b). Information statement February 2007: Essential learnings draft 2. Brisbane, Australia: Author.
36. Queensland Studies Authority (2007c). September 2007 Trial common assessment task: Teacher guidelines. Brisbane, Australia: Author.
37. Queensland Studies Authority (2007d). Year 4 English Trial Statewide Assessment Teacher Guidelines. Brisbane, Australia: Author.
38. Queensland. Department of Education and the Arts (2005). Queensland curriculum, assessment and reporting. Brisbane, Australia: Strategic Policy and Education Futures (Department of Education and the Arts).
39. Roberts, L., Wilson, M. & Draney, K. (1997). The SEPUP assessment system: An overview. Berkeley, USA: University of California.
40. Sadler, D.R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), pp. 175-194.
41. Sadler, D.R. (2007). Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria. Assessment in Education, 14(3), pp. 387-392.
42. Senate Standing Committee on Employment Workplace Relations and Education. (2007). Quality of school education. Retrieved 22 November 2007 from http:// www.aph.gov.au/SENATE/committee/eet-ctte/academic- standards/report/ index.htm
43. Stobart, G. (2005). Fairness in multicultural assessment systems. Assessment in Education, 12(3), pp. 275-287.
44. Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education, 14(3), pp. 281-294.
45. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Western Australia Department of Education and Training (2007). Curriculum, assessment and reporting K-10: Policy and guidelines. Retrieved 20 November 2007 from http:// policies.det.wa.edu.au/our-policies/ti-view?uid= 2f8dell2e321011603765b65ddl47fe2Sriview=summary -view
47. Wilson, M. (2004). Assessment, accountability and the classroom: A community of judgement, in M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (pp. 1-19). Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
48. Wyatt-Smith, CM. & Castleton, G. (2004). Factors affecting writing achievement: Mapping teacher beliefs. English in Education, 38(1), pp. 37-61.
49. Wyatt-Smith, CM. & Castleton, G. (2005). Examining how teachers judge student writing: An Australian case study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), pp. 131-154.
50. Wyatt-Smith, CM., Cumming, JJ. & Elkins, J. (2005). Redesigning assessment, in D. Pendergast St N. Bahr (Eds), Teaching middle years: Rethinking pedagogy and assessment (pp. 271-299). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen St Un win.