The effect of sequence evolution on protein structural divergence

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1055-1065

  Williams, Simon G ^a   Lovell, Simon C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Compensating mutations; Protein structure; Structural divergence

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; AMINO ACIDS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 65349190709     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp020     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Altschuh D, Lesk AM, Bloomer AC, Klug A. 1987. Correlation of co-ordinated amino acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic virus. J Mol Biol. 193: 693-707.
2. Altschuh D, Vernet T, Berti P, Moras D, Nagai K. 1988. Coordinated amino acid changes in homologous protein families. Protein Eng. 2:193-199.
3. Atchley WR, Wollenberg KR, Fitch WM, Terhalle W, Dress AW. 2000. Correlations among amino acid sites in bHLH protein domains: an information theoretic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 17:164-178.
4. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO. 2006. Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1751-1761.
5. Bloom JD, Silberg JJ, Wilke CO, Drummond DA, Adami C, Arnold FH. 2005. Thermodynamic prediction of protein neutrality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:606-611.
6. Blundell TL, Wood SP. 1975. Is the evolution of insulin Darwinian or due to selectively neutral mutation? Nature. 257:197-203.
7. Cai M, Bradford EG, Timkovich R. 1992. Investigation of the solution conformation of cytochrome c-551 from Pseudomonas stutzeri. Biochemistry. 31:8603-8612.
8. Carter DC, Melis KA, O'Donnell SE, Burgess BK, Furey WR Jr., Wang BC, Stout CD. 1985. Crystal structure of Azotobacter cytochrome c5 at 2.5 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 184:279-295.
9. Chelliah V, Chen L, Blundell TL, Lovell SC. 2004. Distinguishing structural and functional restraints in evolution in order to identify interaction sites. J Mol Biol. 342:1487-1504.
10. Chen JC, Miercke LJ, Krucinski J, Starr JR, Saenz G, Wang X, Spilburg CA, Lange LG, Ellsworth JL, Stroud RM. 1998. Structure of bovine pancreatic cholesterol esterase at 1.6 A: novel structural features involved in lipase activation. Biochemistry. 37:5107-5117.
11. Choi SS, Li W, Lahn BT. 2005. Robust signals of coevolution of interacting residues in mammalian proteomes identified by phylogeny-aided structural analysis. Nat Genet. 37:1367-1371.
12. Choi SS, Vallender EJ, Lahn BT. 2006. Systematically assessing the influence of 3-dimensional structural context on the molecular evolution of mammalian proteomes. Mol Biol Evol. 23:2131-2133.
13. Chothia C, Lesk AM. 1986. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. Embo J. 5:823-826.
14. Clarke ND. 1995. Covariation of residues in the homeodomain sequence family. Protein Sci. 4:2269-2278. Connolly ML. 1983. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science. 221:709-713.
15. Cuff AL, Martin AC. 2004. Analysis of void volumes in proteins and application to stability of the p53 tumour suppressor protein. J Mol Biol. 344:1199-1209.
16. DePristo MA, Weinreich DM, Hartl DL. 2005. Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 6:678-687.
17. Engh RA, Huber R. 1991. Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr Section A. 47:392-400.
18. Fares MA, Travers SA. 2006. A novel method for detecting intramolecular coevolution: adding a further dimension to selective constraints analyses. Genetics. 173:9-23.
19. Fitch WM, Markowitz E. 1970. An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution. Biochem Genet. 4:579-593.
20. Flores TP, Orengo CA, Moss DS, Thornton JM. 1993. Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs. Protein Sci. 2:1811-1826.
21. Fukami-Kobayashi K, Schreiber DR, Benner SA. 2002. Detecting compensatory covariation signals in protein evolution using reconstructed ancestral sequences. J Mol Biol. 319: 729-743.
22. Gerstein M, Sonnhammer EL, Chothia C. 1994. Volume changes in protein evolution. J Mol Biol. 236:1067-1078.
23. Ghosh D, Wawrzak Z, Pletnev VZ, Li N, Kaiser R, Pangborn W, Jornvall H, Erman M, Duax WL. 1995. Structure of uncomplexed and linoleate-bound Candida cylindracea cholesterol esterase. Structure. 3:279-288.
24. Gloor GB, Martin LC, Wahl LM, Dunn SD. 2005. Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions. Biochemistry. 44:7156-7165.
25. Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A. 1994. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins. 18: 309-317.
26. Grochulski P, Li Y, Schrag JD, Cygler M. 1994. Two conformational states of Candida rugosa lipase. Protein Sci. 3:82-91.
27. Harpaz Y, Gerstein M, Chothia C. 1994. Volume changes on protein folding. Structure. 2:641-649.
28. Hasegawa J, Yoshida T, Yamazaki T, Sambongi Y, Yu Y, IgarashiY,KodamaT, YamazakiK,KyogokuY,Kobayashi Y. 1998. Solution structure of thermostable cytochrome c-552 from Hydrogenobacter thermophilus determined by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 37:9641-9649.
29. Hennig M, Jansonius JN, Terwisscha van Scheltinga AC, Dijkstra BW, Schlesier B. 1995. Crystal structure of concanavalin B at 1.65 A resolution. An "inactivated" chitinase from seeds of Canavalia ensiformis. J Mol Biol. 254:237-246.
30. Hennig M, Pfeffer-Hennig S, Dauter Z, Wilson KS, Schlesier B, Nong VH. 1995. Crystal structure of narbonin at 1.8 A resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 51:177-189.
31. Hubbard TJ, Blundell TL. 1987. Comparison of solventinaccessible cores of homologous proteins: definitions useful for protein modelling. Protein Eng. 1:159-171.
32. Irving JA, Whisstock JC, Lesk AM. 2001. Protein structural alignments and functional genomics. Prot Struct Func Genet. 42:378-382.
33. Korber BT, Farber RM, Wolpert DH, Lapedes AS. 1993. Covariation of mutations in the V3 loop of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein: an information theoretic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90: 7176-7180.
34. Lesk AM, Chothia C. 1980. How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. J Mol Biol. 136: 225-270.
35. Lim VI, Ptitsyn OB. 1970. On the constancy of the hydrophobic nucleus volume in molecules of myoglobins and hemoglobins. Mol Biol (USSR). 4:372-382.
36. Liu R, Baase WA, Matthews BW. 2000. The introduction of strain and its effects on the structure and stability of T4 lysozyme. J Mol Biol. 295:127-145.
37. Mizuguchi K, Deane CM, Blundell TL, Overington JP. 1998. HOMSTRAD: a database of protein structure alignments for homologous families. Protein Sci. 7:2469-2471.
38. Orengo CA, Thornton JM. 2005. Protein families and their evolution-a structural perspective. Annu Rev Biochem. 74:867-900.
39. Overington J, Donnelly D, Johnson MS, Sali A, Blundell TL. 1992. Environment-specific amino acid substitution tables: tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds. Protein Sci. 1:216-226.
40. Overington J, Johnson MS, Sali A, Blundell TL. 1990. Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity: templates, key residues and structure prediction. Proc Biol Sci. 241:132-145.
41. Pollock DD, Taylor WR, Goldman N. 1999. Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J Mol Biol. 287:187-198.
42. Pritchard L, Bladon P, Mitchell JMO, Dufton MJ. 2001. Evaluation of a novel method for the identification of coevolving protein residues. Protein Eng. 14:549-555.
43. Pritchard L, Dufton MJ. 2000. Do proteins learn to evolve? The Hopfield network as a basis for the understanding of protein evolution. J Theor Biol. 202:77-86.
44. Rao V, Guan C, Van Roey P. 1995. Crystal structure of endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase H at 1.9 A resolution: activesite geometry and substrate recognition. Structure. 3:449-457.
45. Russell RB, Saqi MA, Sayle RA, Bates PA, Sternberg MJ. 1997. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds: analysis of sequence and structure conservation. J Mol Biol. 269:423-439.
46. Sali A, Blundell TL. 1990. Definition of general topological equivalence in protein structures. A procedure involving comparison of properties and relationships through simulated annealing and dynamic programming. J Mol Biol. 212: 403-428.
47. Schrag JD, Cygler M. 1993. 1.8 A refined structure of the lipase from Geotrichum candidum. J Mol Biol. 230:575-591.
48. Sinha N, Nussinov R. 2001. Point mutations and sequence variability in proteins: redistributions of preexisting populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:3139-3144.
49. Socolich M, Lockless SW, Russ WP, Lee H, Gardner KH, Ranganathan R. 2005. Evolutionary information for specifying a protein fold. Nature. 437:512-518.
50. Suel GM, Lockless SW, Wall MA, Ranganathan R. 2003. Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat Struct Biol. 10:59-69.
51. Sutcliffe MJ, Haneef I, Carney D, Blundell TL. 1987. Knowledge based modelling of homologous proteins, Part I: three-dimensional frameworks derived from the simultaneous superposition of multiple structures. Protein Eng. 1:377-384.
52. Timkovich R, Bergmann D, Arciero DM, Hooper AB. 1998. Primary sequence and solution conformation of ferrocytochrome c-552 from Nitrosomonas europaea. Biophys J. 75: 1964-1972.
53. Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM. 2001. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol. 307:1113-1143.
54. Travers SA, Tully DC, McCormack GP, Fares MA. 2007. A study of the coevolutionary patterns operating within the env gene of the HIV-1 group M subtypes. Mol Biol Evol. 24: 2787-2801.
55. Wang ZO, Pollock DD. 2007. Coevolutionary patterns in cytochrome c oxidase subunit I depend on structural and functional context. J Mol Evol. 65:485-495.
56. Wang ZO, Pollock DD. 2005. Context dependence and co-evolution among amino acid residues in proteins. Methods Enzymol. 395:779-790.
57. Wood TC, Pearson WR. 1999. Evolution of protein sequences and structures. J Mol Biol. 291:977-995.
58. Word JM. 2000. All-atom small-probe contact surface analysis: an information-rich description of molecular goodness-of-fit. Durham (NC): Biochemistry Department, Duke University.
59. Word JM, Lovell SC, LaBean TH, Taylor HC, Zalis ME, Presley BK, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. 1999. Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms. J Mol Biol. 285:1711-1733.
60. Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. 1999. Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol. 285:1735-1747.
61. Xu J, Baase WA, Baldwin E, Matthews BW. 1998. The response of T4 lysozyme to large-to-small substitutions within the core and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci. 7:158-177.
62. Yeang CH, Haussler D. 2007. Detecting coevolution in and among protein domains. PLoS Comput Biol. 3:e211.