Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: A 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 951-962

  Dunning, David ^a   Perretta, Scott ^a,b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Gartner/Griggs Andersen   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036798025     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.951     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bothwell, R.K., Deffenbacher, K.A., & Brigham, J.C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691-695.
2. Brigham, J.C., & Bothwell, R.K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 19-30.
3. Brigham, J.C., & Malpass, R.S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 139-155.
4. Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Stuve, T.E. (1988). Jury decision-making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 233-258.
5. Deffenbacher, K.A. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.
6. Devlin, L.P. (1976). Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Departmental Committee on evidence of identification in criminal cases. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
7. Dunning, D., Stern, L.B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818-835.
8. Gilbert, D.T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J.S. Uleman & J.A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189-211). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Gilbert, D.T., Pelham, B.W., & Krull, D.S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.
10. Goldstein, A.G., Chance, J.E., & Schneller, G.R. (1989). Frequency of eyewitness identification in criminal cases: A survey of prosecutors. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 71-74.
11. Gorenstein, G., & Ellsworth, P. (1980). Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 5, 616-622.
12. Hay, D.C., Young, A.W., & Ellis, H.D. (1986). What happens when a face rings a bell? The automatic processing of famous faces. In H.D. Ellis, M.A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Ers.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 136-144). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
13. Kassin, S.M., Rigby, S., & Castillo, S.R. (1991). The accuracy-confidence correlation in eyewitness testimony: Limits and extensions of the retrospective self-awareness effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 698-707.
14. Laughery, K.R., Alexander, J.F., & Lane, A.B. (1971). Recognition of human faces: Effects of target exposure time, target position, and type of photograph. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 490-496.
15. Leippe, M.R., Manion, A.P., & Romanczyk, A. (1992). Eyewitness persuasion: How and how well do fact finders judge the accuracy of adults' and children's memory reports? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 181-197.
16. Levin, D.T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1364-1382.
17. Levin, D.T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559-574.
18. Lindsay, R.C.L., & Bellinger, K. (1999). Alternatives to the sequential lineup: The importance of controlling the pictures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 315-321.
19. Lindsay, R.C.L., Wells, G.L., & O'Connor, F.J. (1989). Mock-juror belief of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 333-339.
20. Lipton, J.P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 90-93.
21. Perretta, S.F. (1998). Whodunnit? Eyewitness accuracy, decision time, and decision processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
22. Perretta, S.F., & Dunning, D. (2001). Testing the automatic versus process of elimination distinction in differentiating accurate from inaccurate eyewitnesses. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University.
23. Robinson, M.D., & Johnson, J.T. (1998). How not to enhance the confidence-accuracy relation: The detrimental effects of attention to the identification process. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 409-428.
24. Robinson, M.D., Johnson, J.T., & Herndon, F. (1997). Reaction time and assessments of cognitive effort as predictors of eyewitness memory accuracy and confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 416-425.
25. Ross, D.F., Read, J.D., & Toglia, M.P. (1994). Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Smith, S.M., Lindsay, R.C.L., & Pryke, S. (2000). Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 542-550.
27. Smith, V.L., Kassin, S.M., & Ellsworth, P.C. (1989). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Within- versus between-subjects correlations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 356-359.
28. Sporer, S.L. (1992). Post-dicting eyewitness accuracy: Confidence, decision-times and person descriptions of choosers and non-choosers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 157-180.
29. Sporer, S.L. (1993). Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 22-33.
30. Sporer, S.L. (1994). Decision-times and eyewitness identification accuracy in simultaneous and sequential lineups. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 300-327). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Sporer, S.L., Malpass, R.S., & Kohnken, G. (1996). Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbanm.
32. Sporer, S.L., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.
33. Stern, L.B., & Dunning, D. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications: A reality monitoring approach. In D. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 273-299). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Treisman, A.M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
35. Wells, G.L. (1984). The psychology of lineup identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 89-103.
36. Wells, G.L., Lindsay, R.C.L., & Ferguson, T.J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440-448.
37. Wells, G.L., & Murray, D.M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 155-170). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.