Aortic valve replacement with pericardial valves in patients with small aortic roots. Clinical results in a consecutive series of patients receiving 19 and 21 mm prostheses

Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 114-118

  Franzén, Stefan F ^a   Nylander, Eva ^a   Olin, Christian L ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Aortic valve surgery; Follow up; Pericardial bioprostheses; Small aortic roof

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; AORTA ROOT; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; EMBOLISM; EPISTAXIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; STROKE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; THROMBOSIS; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; PERICARDIUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035003973     PISSN: 14017431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/140174301750164790     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Palareti G, Leali N, Coccheri S, et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy [see comments]. Lancet 1996; 348(9025): 423-428.
2. Fihn SD, Callahan CM, Martin DC, McDonell MB, Henikoff JG, White RH. The risk for and severity of bleeding complications in elderly patients treated with warfarin. The National Consortium of Anticoagulation Clinics [see comments]. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124(11): 970-979.
3. Chambers J. Echocardiography and the small aortic root. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 5 Suppl 3: S264-S268.
4. Mayumi H, Toshima Y, Kawachi Y, Tokunaga K, Yasui H. Simplified Manouguian's aortic annular enlargement for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 701-704.
5. Edmunds LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 932-935.
6. Bove EL, Marvasti MA, Potts JL, et al. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 90(5): 750-755.
7. Grunkemeier GL, Bodnar E. Comparative assessment of bioprosthesis durability in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 1995; 4(1): 49-55.
8. Thulin LI, Thilen UJ, Kymle KA. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Low incidence of structural valve deterioration in elderly patients during an 11-year follow-up. Scand Cardiovasc J 2000; 34(2): 192-196.
9. Mykén P, Bech-Hanssen O, Phipps B, Caidahl K. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2000; 9(3): 415-422.
10. Poirier NC, Pelletier LC, Pellerin M, Carrier M. 15-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66(6 Suppl): S57-S61.
11. Banbury MK, Cosgrove DM, 3rd, Lytle BW, Smedira NG, Sabik JF, Saunders CR. Long-term results of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: a 12-year follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: S73-S76.
12. Milano A, Guglielmi C, De Carlo M, et al. Valve-related complications in elderly patients with biological and mechanical aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66(6 Suppl): S82-S87.
13. Peterseim DS, Cen YY, Cheruvu S, et al. Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117(5): 890-897.
14. Masters RG, Semelhago LC, Pipe AL, Keon WJ. Are older patients with mechanical heart valves at increased risk? Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68(6): 2169-2172.
15. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial [In Process Citation]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36(4): 1152-1158.
16. Logeais Y, Langanay T, Corbineau H, Roussin R, Rioux C, Leguerrier A. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: bioprosthesis or mechanical valve? Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66(6 Suppl): S77-S81.
17. Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Gill CC, et al. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 89: 358-368.
18. Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, White J, Arnold JH, Cosgrove DM. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119(5): 963-974.
19. Frater RWM, Salomon NW, Rainer WG, Cosgrove DM, Wickham E. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: intermediate results. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 53: 764-771.
20. Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Garcia-Bengoechea JB, Garcia-Acuna JM, et al. The influence of the design on the medium to long-term hemodynamic behavior of 19 mm pericardial aortic valve prostheses. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 5 Suppl 3: S317-S323.
21. Bortolotti U, Scioti G, Milano A, et al. Performance of 21-mm size perimount aortic bioprosthesis in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69(1): 47-50.
22. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978; 58: 20-24.
23. Åsberg KH, Parrow A. Event, incidence, and fatality rates of cerebrovascular diseases in Enko̊ping-Håbo, Sweden, 1986-1988. Scand J Soc Med 1991; 19: 134-139.