Clinical correlations of brain lesion distribution in multiple sclerosis

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 768-773

  Vellinga, M M ^a,c   Geurts, J J G ^a   Rostrup, E ^b   Uitdehaag, B M J ^a   Polman, C H ^a   Barkhof, F ^a   Vrenken, H ^a  

^a MS Center Amsterdam   (Netherlands)

^b Copenhagen University Hospital ^*  (Denmark)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Imaging; Lesion burden; Lesion distribution; Multiple sclerosis; Voxelwise

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DISABILITY; DISEASE DURATION; EXPANDED DISABILITY STATUS SCALE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINAL CORD LESION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 65249180844     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21679     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33:1444-1452.
2. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Arnold DL, et al. EFNS guidelines on the use of neuroimaging in the management of multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:313-325.
3. Fisniku LK, Brex PA, Altmann DR, et al. Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2008;131:808-817.
4. Goodin DS. Magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate outcome measure of disability in multiple sclerosis: have we been overly harsh in our assessment? Ann Neurol 2006;59:597-605.
5. Kappos L, Moeri D, Radue EW, et al. Predictive value of gadolinium- enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for relapse rate and changes in disability or impairment in multiple sclerosis: a meta- analysis. Gadolinium MRI Meta-Analysis Group. Lancet 1999;353: 964-969.
6. Lee MA, Smith S, Palace J, et al. Spatial mapping of T2 and gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesion volumes in multiple sclerosis: evidence for distinct mechanisms of lesion genesis? Brain 1999;122(Pt 7): 1261-1270.
7. Li DK, Held U, Petkau J, et al. MRI T2 lesion burden in multiple sclerosis: a plateauing relationship with clinical disability. Neurology 2006;66:1384-1389.
8. Miki Y, Grossman RI, Udupa JK, et al. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: longitudinal analysis of MR images-lack of correlation between changes in T2 lesion volume and clinical findings. Radiology 1999;213:395-399.
9. Rudick RA, Lee JC, Simon J, Fisher E. Significance of T2 lesions in multiple sclerosis: a 13-year longitudinal study. Ann Neurol 2006; 60:236-242.
10. Wilson M, Tench CR, Morgan PS, Blumhardt LD. Pyramidal tract mapping by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: improving correlations with disability. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:203-207.
11. Riahi F, Zijdenbos A, Narayanan S, et al. Improved correlation between scores on the expanded disability status scale and cerebral lesion load in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Results of the application of new imaging methods. Brain 1998;121(Pt 7): 1305-1312.
12. Lin X, Tench CR, Morgan PS, Niepel G, Constantinescu CS. "Importance sampling" in MS: use of diffusion tensor tractography to quantify pathology related to specific impairment. J Neurol Sci 2005;237:13-19.
13. Di Perri C, Battaglini M, Stromillo ML, et al. Voxel-based assessment of differences in damage and distribution of white matter lesions between patients with primary progressive and relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2008;65:236-243.
14. Paty DW, Li DK, Oger JJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1994; 36(Suppl):S95-S96.
15. Koziol JA, Wagner S, Sobel DF, Feng AC, Adams HP. Asymmetries in the spatial distributions of enhancing lesions and black holes in relapsing-remitting MS. J Clin Neurosci 2005;12:895-901.
16. Narayanan S, Fu L, Pioro E, et al. Imaging of axonal damage in multiple sclerosis: spatial distribution of magnetic resonance imaging lesions. Ann Neurol 1997;41:385-391.
17. Lucchinetti CF, Bruck W, Rodriguez M, Lassmann H. Distinct patterns of multiple sclerosis pathology indicates heterogeneity on pathogenesis. Brain Pathol 1996;6:259-274.
18. Charil A, Zijdenbos AP, Taylor J, et al. Statistical mapping analysis of lesion location and neurological disability in multiple sclerosis: application to 452 patient data sets. Neuroimage 2003;19:532-544.
19. Agosta F, Absinta M, Sormani MP, et al. In vivo assessment of cervical cord damage in MS patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study. Brain 2007;130:2211-2219.
20. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50: 121-127.
21. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria". Ann Neurol 2005;58:840-846.
22. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13:227-231.
23. Cutter GR, Baier ML, Rudick RA, et al. Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Brain 1999;122(Pt 5):871-882.
24. Mazziotta JC, Toga AW, Evans A, Fox P, Lancaster J. A probabilistic atlas of the human brain: theory and rationale for its development. The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Neuroimage 1995;2:89-101.
25. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23(Suppl 1):S208-S219.
26. Lycklama G, Thompson A, Filippi M, et al. Spinal-cord MRI in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2003;2:555-562.
27. Smith SM. Overview offMRI analysis. Br J Radiol 2004;77(Spec No 2):S167-S175.
28. Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;15:1-25.
29. Friston KJ, Holmes A, Poline JB, Price CJ, Frith CD. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power. Neuroimage 1996;4:223-235.
30. Foong J, Rozewicz L, Quaghebeur G, et al. Executive function in multiple sclerosis. The role of frontal lobe pathology. Brain 1997; 120(Pt 1):15-26.
31. Lazeron RH, Boringa JB, Schouten M, et al. Brain atrophy and lesion load as explaining parameters for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2005;11:524-531.
32. Lee M, Reddy H, Johansen-Berg H, et al. The motor cortex shows adaptive functional changes to brain injury from multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2000;47:606-613.
33. Reddy H, Narayanan S, Arnoutelis R, et al. Evidence for adaptive functional changes in the cerebral cortex with axonal injury from multiple sclerosis. Brain 2000;123(Pt 11):2314-2320.
34. Rocca MA, Colombo B, Falini A, et al. Cortical adaptation in patients with MS: a cross-sectional functional MRI study of disease phenotypes. Lancet Neurol 2005;4:618-626.
35. Parry A, Clare S, Jenkinson M, Smith S, Palace J, Matthews PM. White matter and lesion T1 relaxation times increase in parallel and correlate with disability in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2002; 249:1279-1286.
36. Vrenken H, Geurts JJ, Knol DL, et al. Whole-brain T1 mapping in multiple sclerosis: global changes of normal-appearing gray and white matter. Radiology 2006;240:811-820.