The influence of testing context on tea bag product acceptance in central location tests

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 835-851

  Posri, Wilatsana ^a,b   Macfie, Hal ^b  

^a KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b Hal MacFie Training Services   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65249170879     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00190.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BORCHGREVINK, C.P., SUSSKIND, A.M. and TARRAS, J.M. 1999. Consumer preferred hot beverage temperatures. Food Qual. Pref. 10, 117-121.
2. BOUTROLLE, I., DELARUE, J., ARRANZ, D., ROGEAUX, M. and KOSTER, E.P. 2007. Central location test vs. home use test: Contrasting results depending on product type. Food Qual. Pref. 18, 490-499.
3. BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. 1980. Method for Preparation of a Liquor of Tea for Use in Sensory Tests: BS6008, British Standards Institution, London.
4. BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. 1993. Assessors for Sensory Analysis: Part One, Guide to the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Selected Assessors: BS7667, British Standards Institution, London.
5. CARDELLO, A. 1995. Food quality: Relativity, context and consumer expectations. Food Qual. Pref. 6, 163-170.
6. CARDELLO, A., SCHUTZ, H., SNOW, C. and LESHER, L. 2000. Predictors of food acceptance, consumption and satisfaction in specific eating situations. Food Qual. Pref. 11, 201-206.
7. CHUNG, S-J. and VICKERS, Z. 2007. Long-term acceptability and choice of teas differing in sweetness. Food Qual. Pref. 18, 963-974.
8. DIJKSTERHUIS, G., MOJET, J., KOSTER, E.P., MOLLER, P., HAUSNER, H., ISSANCHOU, S., SULMONT-ROSSE, C. and ZANDSTRA, E.H. 2006. Workshop summary: The role of memory in food choice and liking. Food Qual. Pref. 17, 1.
9. GOLDMAN, A. 1994. Predicting product performance in the marketplace by immediate-and extended-use sensory testing. Food Technol. 48, 103-106.
10. GREENHOFF, K. and MACFIE, H.J.H. 1994. Preference mapping in practice. In Measurement of Food Preferences (H.J.H. MacFie and D.M.H. Thomson, eds.) pp. 137-166, Blackie Academic & Professional, London.
11. GRIFFIN, R. 1991. Product optimization in central-location testing and subsequent validation and calibration in home-use testing. J. Sensory Studies 5, 231-240.
12. HERSLETH, M., UELAND, O., ALLAIN, H. and NAES, T. 2005. Consumer acceptance of cheese, influence of different testing conditions. Food Qual. Pref. 16, 103-110.
13. ISHII, R., KAWAGUCHI, H., O'MAHONY, M. and ROUSSEAU, B. 2007. Relating consumer and trained panels' discriminative sensitivities using vanilla flavored ice cream as a medium. Food Qual. Pref. 18, 89-96.
14. KING, S.C., WEBER, A.J., MEISELMAN, H.L. and LV, N. 2004. The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability. Food Qual. Pref. 15, 645-653.
15. KING, S.C., MEISELMAN, H.L., HOTTENSTEIN, A.W., WORK, T.M. and CRONK, V. 2007. The effects of contextual variables on food acceptability: A confirmatory study. Food Qual. Pref. 18, 58-65.
16. KOSTER, E.P. 2006. Memory for food and food expectations: A special case? Food Qual. Pref. 17, 3-5.
17. KOSTER, E.P., COURONNE, T., LEON, F., LEVY, C. and MARCELINO, A.S. 2002. Repeatability in hedonic sensory measurement: A conceptual exploration. Food Qual. Pref. 14, 165-176.
18. LANGE, C., ISSANCHOU, S. and COMBRIS, P. 2000. Expected versus experienced quality: Trade-off with price. Food Qual. Pref. 11, 289-297.
19. LAWLESS, H.T. and HEYMANN, H.H. 1998. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices, Chapman & Hall, London.
20. LEVIS, P.A., CHAMBERS, E. and JOHNSON, D.E. 2000. Consumption and liking of a fat modified product during short trial periods. Nutr. Res. 20, 791-804.
21. LEVY, C.M. and KOSTER, E.P. 1999. The relevance of initial hedonic judgements in the prediction of subtle food choices. Food Qual. Pref. 10, 185-200.
22. LEVY, C.M., MACRAE, A. and KOSTER, E.P. 2006. Perceived stimulus complexity and food preference development. Acta Psychol. 123, 394-413.
23. MACFIE, H.J.H., BRATCHELL, N., GREENHOFF, K. and VALLIS, L.V. 1989. Designs to balance the effects of order presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. J. Sensory Studies 4, 129-148.
24. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G.V. and CARR, B.T. 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, CRC Press, Inc., London.
25. MEISELMAN, H.L., KING, S.C. and WEBER, A.J. 2003. Relationship of acceptability to consumption in a meal-testing environment, and the use of intake to predict product acceptability in a meal. Appetite 41, 203-204.
26. MINTEL. 2007. Tea and Herbal Tea-UK-February 2007, Mintel International Group, London.
27. PETIT, C. and SIEFFERMANN, J.M. 2007. Testing consumer preferences for iced-coffee: Does the drinking environment have any influence? Food Qual. Pref. 18, 161-172.
28. PORCHEROT, C. and ISSANCHOU, S. 1998. Dynamics of liking for flavoured crackers: Test of predictive value of a boredom test. Food Qual. Pref. 9, 21-29.
29. STONE, H. and SIDEL, J.L. 1993. Sensory Evaluation Practices, Academic Press, London.
30. VICKERS, Z.M. and HOLTON, E. 1998. A comparison of taste test ratings, repeated consumption, and post-consumption ratings of different strengths of iced tea. J. Sensory Studies 13, 199-212.