Enigmatic variations: Honours degree assessment regulations in the UK

Higher Education Quarterly

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 157-180

  Yorke, Mantz ^a   Woolf, Harvey ^b   Stowell, Marie ^c   Allen, Rick ^d   Haines, Chris ^e   Redding, Marian ^d   Scurry, Dave ^f   Taylor Russell, Graham ^g   Turnbull, Wayne ^h   Walker, Lawrie ⁱ  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WORCESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^g LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^h LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WEST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65249143959     PISSN: 09515224     EISSN: 14682273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00389.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adelman, C. (2006) The Toolbox Revisited: Paths to Degree Completion from High School through College. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
2. Armstrong, M., Clarkson, P. and Noble, M. (1998) Modularity and Credit Frameworks: The NUCCAT Survey and 1998 Conference Report. Newcastle upon Tyne: Northern Universities Consortium for Credit Accumulation and Transfer.
3. AVCC (2002) Grades for Honours Programs (concurrent with pass degree), 2002. http://www.avcc.edu.au/documents/universities/ key_survey_summaries/Grades_forr_Degree_Subjects_Jun02.xls, last accessed 22 August 2007.
4. Baty, P. (2000) V-c's 'Plea for Firsts' Fuels Quality Fears. The Times Higher Education Supplement, June 30, No. 1442, p. 1.
5. Bridges, P., Cooper, A., Evanson, P., Haines, C., Jenkins, D., Scurry, D., Woolf, H. and Yorke, M. (2002) Coursework Marks High, Examination Marks Low: Discuss. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27 (1), pp. 35-48.
6. Brumfield, C. (2004) Current Trends in Grades and Grading Practices in Higher Education: Results of the 2004 AACRAO Survey. Washington, DC: American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers.
7. Carroll, J. and Seymour, D. (2006) The Effect of a Penalty Tariff on Consistent Decision-Making in Cases of Student Plagiarism. Paper presented at the Second International Plagiarism Conference, Gateshead, 19-21 June, http://www.jiscpas.ac.uk/documents/papers/2006Papers24.pdf, last accessed 1 September 2007.
8. Cooke, R. (2000) Letter. The Times Higher Education Supplement. July 14, No. 1444, p. 15.
9. Dalziel, J. (1998) Using Marks to Assess Student Performance: Some Problems and Alternatives. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23 (4), pp. 351-366.
10. DfES (2003) The Future of Higher Education (Cm. 5735). Norwich: The Stationery Office.
11. Elton, L. (1998) Are UK Degree Standards Going Up, Down or Sideways? Studies in Higher Education, 23 (1), pp. 35-42.
12. Hays, R. B., Davies, H. A., Beard, J. D., Caldon, L. J. M., Farmer, E. A., Finucane, P. M., McCrorie, P., Newble, D. I., Schuwirth, L. W. T. and Sibbald, G. R. (2002) Selecting Performance Assessment Methods for Experienced Physicians. Medical Education, 36 (10), pp. 910-917.
13. Knight, P. T. (2000) The Value of a Programme-wide approach to Assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (3), pp. 237-251.
14. Knight, P. T. and Yorke, M. (2003) Assessment, Learning and Employability. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.
15. Lindsay, R., Paton-Saltzberg, R. and Turner, D. (1998) Some Effects of Programme Structure on Student Marks. Teaching Forum 46 (Autumn), pp. 12-13.
16. Mason, G., Williams, G., Cranmer, S. and Guile, D. (2003) How Much Does Higher Education Enhance the Employability of Graduates? http://www.hefce.ac.uk/Pubs/rdreports/2003/rd13_03/, last accessed 5 November 2007.
17. NCIHE (1997) Higher Education in the Learning Society (Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education): 'The Dearing Report'. Norwich: HMSO.
18. OIA (2007) Annual Report, 2006. London: Office of the Independent. Adjudicator for Higher Education.
19. QAA (2007) The Classification of Degree Awards. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/ enhancement/qualityMatters/QMApril07.pdf, last accessed 25 October 2007.
20. Rogers, C. (2002) Developing a Positive Approach to Failure. In M. Peelo and T. Wareham (eds.), Failing Students in Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research Higher Education and Open University Press, pp. 113-123.
21. Schuwirth, L. W. T., Southgate, L., Page, G. G., Paget, N. S., Lescop, J. M. J., Lew, S. R., Wade, W. B. and Barón-Maldonado, M. (2002) When Enough is Enough: A Conceptual Basis for Fair and Defensible Practice Performance Assessment. Medical Education, 36 (10), pp. 925-930.
22. Simonite, V. (2003) The Impact of Coursework on Degree Classifications and the Performance of Individual Students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (3), pp. 459-470.
23. Stowell, M. (2004) Equity, Justice and Standards: Assessment Decision Making in Higher Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (4), pp. 495-510.
24. Tennant, P., Rowell, G. and Duggan, F. (2007) The Range and Spread of Penalties Available for Student Plagiarism among UK Higher Education Institutions. http://www.jiscpas.ac.uk/documents/amber/FinalReport.pdf, last accessed 30 August 2007.
25. UUK and GuildHE (2006) The UK Honours Degree: Provision Of Information -Second Consultation. London: Universities UK and GuildHE. http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/consultations/universitiesuk/, last accessed 22 August 2007.
26. UUK and GuildHE (2007) Beyond the Honours Degree Classification: The Burgess Group Final Report. London: Universities UK and GuildHE. http://bookshop.universitiesuk.ac.uk/downloads/Burgess_final.pdf, last accessed 17 October 2007.
27. UUK and SCoP (2004) Measuring and Recording Student Achievement. London: Universities UK and Standing Conference of Principals. http://bookshop.universitiesuk.ac.uk/downloads/measuringachievement.pdf, last accessed 22 August 2007.
28. UUK and SCoP (2005) The UK Honours Degree: Provision of Information. London: Universities UK and Standing Conference of Principals. http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/consultations/universitiesuk/, last accessed 22 August 2007.
29. Woolf, H. and Turner, D. (1997) Honours classifications: The Need for Transparency. The New Academic, (Autumn), pp. 10-12.
30. Yorke, M. (2008) Grading Student Achievement: Signals and Shortcomings. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.
31. Yorke, M., Barnett, G., Bridges, P., Evanson, P., Haines, C., Jenkins, D., Knight, P., Scurry, D., Stowell, M. and Woolf, H. (2002) Does Grading Method Influence Honours Degree Classification? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27 (3), pp. 269-279.
32. Yorke, M., Barnett, G., Evanson, P., Haines, C., Jenkins, D., Knight, P., Scurry, D., Stowell, M. and Woolf, H. (2004) Some Effects of the Award Algorithm on Honours Degree Classifications in UK Higher Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (4), pp. 401-413.