Plants are used to having identity crises

Evolving Pathways: Key Themes in Evolutionary Developmental Biology

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 194-213

  Rutishauser, Rolf ^a   Grob, Valentin ^a   Pfeifer, Evelin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65249125407     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511541582.015     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Arber, A. 1947. Analogy in the history of science. In M. F. Ashley Montagu (ed.) Studies and Essays in the History of Science and Learning, Offered in Homage to G. Sarton. New York: Henry Schuman, pp. 221-233.
2. Arber, A. 1950. The Natural Philosophy of Plant Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baluska, F., Volkmann, D. & Barlow, P. W. 2004. Cell bodies in a cage. Nature 428, 371.
4. Barlow, P. W., Luck, H. B. & Luck, J. 2001. The natural philosophy of plant form: cellular autoreproduction as a component of a structural explanation of plant form. Annals of Botany 88, 1141-1152.
5. Baum, D. A. & Donoghue, M. J. 2002. Transference of function, heterotopy and the evolution of plant development. In Q. C. B. Cronk, R. M. Bateman & J. A. Hawkins (eds.) Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 52-69.
6. Bey, M., Stüber, K., Fellenberg, K. et al. 2004. Characterization of Antirrhinum petal development and identification of target genes of the class B MADS box gene DEFICIENS. Plant Cell 16, 3197-3215.
7. Bharathan, G., Goliber, T. E., Moore, C. et al. 2002. Homologies in leaf form inferred from KNOX1 gene expression during development. Science 296, 1858-1860.
8. Birnbaum, K. & Benfey, P. N. 2004. Network building: transcriptional circuits in the root. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7, 582-588.
9. Blochlinger, K., Jan, L. Y. & Jan, Y. N. 1991. Transformation of sensory organ identity by ectopic expression of Cut in Drosophila. Genes & Development 5, 1124-1135.
10. Bock, G. R. & Cardew, G. (eds.) 1999. Homology (Novartis Foundation Symposium 222). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Brower, A. V. Z. 2000. Homology and the inference of systematic relationships: some historical and philosophical perspectives. In R. Scotland & R. T. Pennington (eds.) Homology and Systematics. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 10-21.
12. Byrne, M. E., Kidner, C. A. & Martienssen, R. A. 2003. Plant stem cells: divergent pathways and common themes in shoots and roots. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 13, 551-557.
13. Charlton, W. A. 1991. Homoeosis and shoot construction in Azara microphylla Hook. (Flacourtiaceae). Acta Botanica Neerlandica 40, 329-337.
14. Coen, E. 1999. The Art of Genes: How Organisms Make Themselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Cronk, Q.C. B. 2001. Plant evolution and development in a post-genomic context. Nature Reviews Genetics 2, 607-619.
16. Elledge, S. J. 1996. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274, 1664-1672.
17. Endress, P. K. 2006. Angiosperm floral evolution: morphological developmental framework. Advances in Botanical Research 44, 1-61.
18. Fisher, J. B. 2002. Indeterminate leaves of Chisocheton (Meliaceae): survey of structure and development. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 139, 207-221.
19. Friedman, W. E., Moore, R. C. & Purugganan, M. D. 2004. The evolution of plant development. American Journal of Botany 91, 1726-1741.
20. Fukuda, T., Yokoyama, J. & Tsukaya, H. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among species in the genera Chisocheton and Guarea that have unique indeterminate leaves as inferred from sequences of chloroplast DNA. International Journal of Plant Science 164, 13-24.
21. Gallois, J.-L., Nora, F. R., Mizukami, Y. & Sablowski, R. 2004. WUSCHEL induces shoot stem cell activity and developmental plasticity in the root meristem. Genes & Development 18, 375-380.
22. Geuten, K., Becker, A., Kaufmann, K. et al. 2006. A petal identity crisis - MADS- domain proteins and the evolution of petaloidy in balsaminoid Ericales. First Meeting of the European Society for Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Prague. Abstracts, pp. 102-103.
23. Grob, V., Moline, P., Pfeifer, E., Novelo, A. R. & Rutishauser, R. 2006. Developmental morphology of branching flowers in Nymphaea prolifera. Journal of Plant Research 119, 561-570.
24. Hawkins, J. A. 2002. Evolutionary developmental biology: impact on systematic theory and practice, and the contribution of systematics. In Q. C. B. Cronk, R. M. Bateman & J. A. Hawkins (eds.) Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 32-51.
25. Hay, A. & Mabberley, D. J. 1994. On perception of plant morphology: some implications for phylogeny. In D. S. Ingram & A. Hudson (eds.) Shape and Form in Plants and Fungi. London: The Linnean Society of London, pp. 101-117.
26. HOf er, J. M. I., Gourlay, C. W. & Ellis, T. H. N. 2001. Genetic control of leaf morphology: a partial view. Annals of Botany 88, 1129-1139.
27. Jackson, D. 1996. Plant morphogenesis: designing leaves. Current Biology 6, 917-919.
28. Jaramillo, M. A. & Kramer, E. M. 2007. The role of developmental genetics in understanding homology and morphological evolution in plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences 168, 61-72.
29. Kirchoff, B. K. 1991. Homeosis in the flowers of the Zingiberales. American Journal of Botany 64, 833-837.
30. Koi, S. & Kato, M. 2003. Comparative developmental anatomy of the root in three species of Cladopus (Podostemaceae). Annals of Botany 91, 927-933.
31. Lacroix, C., Jeune, B. & Purcell-Macdonald, S. 2003. Shoot and compound leaf comparisons in eudicots: dynamic morphology as an alternative approach. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 143, 219-230.
32. Lugassi, N., Nakayama, N., Irish, V. F. & Zik, M. 2006. Identity crisis: a novel floral organ mutant. XV Congress of the Federation of European Societies of Plant Biology, Lyon. Abstracts, DEVO1-014.
33. Marx, G. A. 1987. A suite of mutants that modify pattern formation in pea leaves. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 5, 311-335.
34. Minelli, A. 1998. Molecules, developmental modules and phenotypes: a combinatorial approach to homology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9, 340-347.
35. Minelli, A. & Fusco, G. 2004. Evo-devo perspectives on segmentation: model organisms, and beyond. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 423-429.
36. Nagasawa, N., Miyoshi, M., Sano, Y. et al. 2003. SUPERWOMAN1 and DROOPING LEAF leaf genes control floral organ identity in rice. Development 130, 705-718.
37. Ota, M., Imaichi, R. & Kato, M. 2001. Developmental morphology of the thalloid Hydrobryum japonicum (Podostemaceae). American Journal of Botany 88, 382-390.
38. Parcy, F., Nilsson, O., Busch, M. A., Lee, I. & Weigel, D. 1998. A genetic framework for floral patterning. Nature 395, 561-566.
39. Prusinkiewicz, P. 2004. Self-similarity in plants: integrating mathematical and biological perspectives. In M. Novak (ed.) Thinking in Patterns. Fractals and Related Phenomena in Nature. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 103-118.
40. Raven, J. A. & Edwards, D. 2001. Roots: evolutionary origins and biogeochemical significance. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 381-401.
41. Reiser, L., Sanchez-Baracaldo, P. & Kake, S. 2000. Knots in the family tree: evolutionary relationships and functions of knox homeobox genes. Plant Molecular Biology 42, 151-166.
42. Rutishauser, R. 1995. Developmental patterns of leaves in Podostemaceae as compared to more typical flowering plants: saltational evolution and fuzzy morphology. Canadian Journal of Botany 73, 1305-1317.
43. Rutishauser, R. 1999. Polymerous leaf whorls in vascular plants: developmental morphology and fuzziness of organ identity. International Journal of Plant Science 160, S81-S103.
44. Rutishauser, R. & Isler, B. 2001. Fuzzy Arberian Morphology: Utricularia, developmental mosaics, partial shoot hypothesis of the leaf and other FAMous ideas of Agnes Arber (1879-1960) on vascular plant bauplans. Annals of Botany 88, 1173-1202.
45. Rutishauser, R. & Moline, P. 2005. Evo-devo and the search for homology (“sameness”) in biological systems. Theory in Biosciences 124, 213-241.
46. Rutishauser, R. & Sattler, R. 1986. Architecture and development of the phyllode- stipules whorls in Acacia longipedunculata: controversial interpretations and continuum approach. Canadian Journal of Botany 64, 1987-2019.
47. Sattler, R. 1994. Homology, homeosis, and process morphology in plants. In B. K. Hall (ed.) The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 423-475.
48. Sattler, R. 1996. Classical morphology and continuum morphology: opposition and continuum. Annals of Botany 78, 577-581.
49. Sattler, R. 2001. Some comments on the morphological, scientific, philosophical and spiritual significance of Agnes Arber’s life and work. Annals of Botany 88, 1215-1217.
50. Sattler, R. & Jeune, B. 1992. Multivariate analysis confirms the continuum view of plant form. Annals of Botany 69, 249-262.
51. Sattler, R. & Rutishauser, R. 1990. Structural and dynamic descriptions of the development of Utricularia foliosa and U. australis. Canadian Journal of Botany 68, 1989-2003.
52. Scheres, B. 2001. Plant cell identity. The role of position and lineage. Plant Physiology 125, 112-114.
53. Scheres, B., McKhann, H. I. & van den Berg, C. 1996. Roots redefined: anatomical and genetic analysis of root development. Plant Physiology 111, 959-964.
54. Schichnes, D., Schneeberger, R. & Freeling, M. 1997. Induction of leaves directly from leaves in the maize mutant Lax midrib I-zero. Developmental Biology 186, 36-45.
55. Schneider, H., Pryer, K. M., Cranfill, R., Smith, A. R. & Wolf, P. G. 2002. Evolution of vascular plant body plans: a phylogenetic perspective. In Q. C. B. Cronk, R. M. Bateman, J. A. Hawkins (eds.) Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 1-14.
56. Sehgal, A., Sethi, M. & Mohan Ram, H. Y. 2002. Origin, structure, and interpretation of the thallus in Hydrobryopsis sessilis (Podostemaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 163, 891-905.
57. Shubin, N., Tabin, C. & Carroll, S. 1997. Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388, 639-648.
58. Sinha, N. R. 1999. Leaf development in angiosperms. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 50, 419-446.
59. Soltis, D. E., Albert, V. A., Kim, S. et al. 2005. Evolution of the flower. In R. J. Henry (ed.) Plant Diversity and Evolution: Genotypic and Phenotypic Variation in Higher Plants. Cambridge, MA: CAB International, pp. 165-200.
60. Stahl, Y. & Simon, R. 2005. Plant stem cell niches. International Journal Of develop- mental Biology 49, 479-489.
61. Steeves, T. A., Hicks, G., Steeves, M. & Retallack, B. 1993. Leaf determination in the fern Osmunda cinnamomea: a reinvestigation. Annals of Botany 71, 511-517.
62. Svensson, M. E. 2004. Homology and homocracy revisited: gene expression patterns and hypotheses of homology. Development Genes & Evolution 214, 418-421.
63. Sylvester, A. W., Smith, L., & Freeling, M. 1996. Acquisition of identity in the developing leaf. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 12, 257-304.
64. Tattersall, A. D., Turner, L., Knox, M. R. et al. 2005. The mutant crispa reveals multiple roles for PHANTASTICA in pea compound leaf development. The Plant Cell 17, 1046-1060.
65. Theissen, G. 2000. Plant Breeding: Flo-like meristem identity genes: from basic science to crop plant design. Progress in Botany 61, 167-183.
66. Theissen, G. 2005. Birth, life and death of developmental control genes: new challenges for the homology concept. Theory in Biosciences 124, 199-212.
67. Tsukaya, H. 1995. Developmental genetics of leaf morphogenesis in dicotyledonous plants. Journal of Plant Research 108, 407-416.
68. Tsukaya, H. 2002. Interpretation of mutants in leaf morphology: genetic evidence for a compensatory system in leaf morphogenesis that provides a new link between cell and organismal theories. International Review of Cytology 217, 1-39.
69. Vergara-Silva, F. 2003. Plants and the conceptual articulation of evolutionary developmental biology. Biology and Philosophy 18, 249-284.
70. Walker-Larsen, J. & Harder, L. D. 2000. The evolution of staminodes in angio- sperms: patterns of stamen reduction, loss, and functional re-invention. American Journal of Botany 87, 1367-1384.
71. Williams-Carrier, R. E., Lie, Y. S., Hake, S. & Lemaux, P. G. 1997. Ectopic expression of the maize kn1 gene phenocopies the Hooded mutant of barley. Development 124, 3737-3745.
72. Xu, J., Hofhuis, H., Heidstra, R. et al. 2006. A molecular framework for plant regeneration. Science 311, 385-388.
73. Yagil, E. & Stebbins, G. L. 1969. The morphogenetic effects of the hooded gene in barley. II. Cytological and environmental factors affecting gene expression. Genetics 62, 307-319.
74. Yaxley, J. L., Jablonski, W. & Reid, J. B. 2001. Leaf and flower development in pea (Pisum sativum L.): Mutants cochleata and unifoliata. Annals of Botany 88, 225-234.
75. Yu, D., Kotilainen, M., Pollanen, E. et al. 1999. Organ identity genes and modified patterns of flower development in Gerbera hybrida. Plant Journal 17, 51-62.