Multiple auditory steady state responses (80-101 Hz): Effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity and modulation rate

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 100-109

  Picton, Terence W ^a   Van Roon, Patricia ^a   John, M Sasha ^a  

^a ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EAR; FEMALE; GENDER; HANDEDNESS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HANDEDNESS; MALE; MASKING; NORMAL HUMAN; SOUND INTENSITY; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; GENDER IDENTITY; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HOMEOSTASIS; METHODOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; EAR; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GENDER IDENTITY; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMANS; MALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64849116041     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819003ef     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Arthur, R. M., Pfeiffer, R. R., & Suga, N. (1971). Properties of 'two-tone inhibition' in primary auditory neurons. J Physiol, 212, 593-609.
2. Beagley, H. A., & Sheldrake, J. B. (1978). Differences in brainstem response latency with age and sex. Br J Audiol, 12, 69-77. (Pubitemid 9001038)
3. Bowman, D. M., Brown, D. K., & Kimberley, B. P. (2000). An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults. Hear Res, 142, 1-11.
4. Chung, D. Y., Mason, K., Gannon, R. P., et al. (1983). The ear effect as a function of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 73, 1277-1282.
5. Cleveland, W. S. (1993). Visualizing data. New Jersey: Murray Hill.
6. Cooper, J. C., Jr. (1994). Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 1971-75: part, I. Ear and race effects in hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 30-36
7. Corso, J. F. (1963). Age and sex differences in pure-tone thresholds. Survey of hearing levels from 18 to 65 years. Arch Otolaryngol, 77, 385-405.
8. Delgutte, B. (1990). Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 791-809.
9. Don, M., Ponton, C. W., Eggermont, J. J., et al. (1993). Gender differences in cochlear response time: an explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 2135-2148. (Pubitemid 23307670)
10. Dreisbach, L. E., Kramer, S. J., Cobos, S., et al. (2007). Racial and gender effects on pure-tone thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in normal-hearing young adults. Int J Audiol, 46, 419-426. (Pubitemid 47123988)
11. Durlach, N. (2006). Auditory masking: need for improved conceptual structure. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 1787-1790.
12. Galambos, R., Bauer, J., Picton, T. W., et al. (1972). Loudness enhancement following contralateral stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am, 52, 1127-1130.
13. Gifford, R. H., & Bacon, S. P. (2000). Contributions of suppression and excitation to simultaneous masking: effects of signal frequency and masker-signal frequency relation. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 2188-2200.
14. Hall, J. W., III. (2006). New handbook for auditory evoked responses (pp. 234-235). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Herdman, A. T., Lins, O., Van Roon, P., et al. (2002). Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr, 15, 69-86. (Pubitemid 36083113)
16. Herdman, A. T., & Stapells, D. R. (2001). Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol, 30, 41-49.
17. Herdman, A. T., & Stapells, D. R. (2003). Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol, 42, 237-248. (Pubitemid 37372663)
18. Houtgast, T. (1972). Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 51, 1885-1894.
19. ISO 389-392 (1994). Acoustics - reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment - part 2: reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and insert earphones. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
20. Job, A., Grateau, P., & Picard, J. (1998). Intrinsic differences in hearing performances between ears revealed by the asymmetrical shooting posture in the army. Hear Res, 122, 119-124. (Pubitemid 28352720)
21. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2001). Weighted averaging of steady-state responses. Clin Neurophysiol, 112, 555-562.
22. John, M. S., Lins, O. G., Boucher, B. L., et al. (1998). Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology, 37, 59-82. (Pubitemid 28143463)
23. John, M. S., & Picton, T. W. (2000a). MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 61, 125-150.
24. John, M. S., & Picton, T. W. (2000b). Human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones: phase and latency measurements. Hear Res, 141, 57-79. (Pubitemid 30125316)
25. John, M. S., Purcell, D. W., Dimitrijevic, A., et al. (2002). Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 246-259. (Pubitemid 34918911)
26. Kannan, P. M., & Lipscomb, D. M. (1974). Bilateral hearing asymmetry in a large population. J Acoust Soc Am, 55, 1092-1094.
27. Keefe, D. H., Ellison, J. C., Fitzpatrick, D. F., et al. (2008). Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 1479-1494.
28. Kjaer, M. (1979). Differences of latencies and amplitudes of brain stem evoked potentials in subgroups of a normal material. Acta Neurol Scand, 59, 72-79.
29. Kurakata, K., Mizunami, T., & Matsushita, K. (2006). Pure-tone audiometric thresholds of young and older adults. Acoust Sci Tech, 27, 114-116.
30. Lins, O. G., Picton, P. E., Picton, T. W., et al. (1995). Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 3051-3063.
31. Lins, O. G., & Picton, T. W. (1995). Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 420-432.
32. Luts, H., Desloovere, C., & Wouters, J. (2006). Clinical application of dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses in high-risk newborns and young children. Audiol Neurootol, 11, 24-37. (Pubitemid 43087557)
33. McClelland, R. J., & McCrea, R. S. (1979). Intersubject variability of the auditory-evoked brain stem potentials. Audiology, 18, 462-471. (Pubitemid 10188341)
34. Michalewski, H. J., Thompson, L. W., Patterson, J. V., et al. (1980). Sex differences in the amplitudes and latencies of the human auditory brain stem potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 48, 351-356.
35. Moore, B. C., & Glasberg, B. R. (1982). Interpreting the role of suppression in psychophysical tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am, 72, 1374-1379.
36. O'Donovan, C. A., Beagley, H. A., & Shaw, M. (1980). Latency of brainstem response in children. Br J Audiol, 14, 23-29.
37. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
38. Picton, T. W., Dimitrijevic, A., Perez-Abalo, M. C., et al. (2005). Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 140-156. (Pubitemid 43375742)
39. Picton, T. W., Durieux-Smith, A., Champagne, S. C., et al. (1998). Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 315-331.
40. Picton, T. W., John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., et al. (2003). Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42, 177-219.
41. Picton, T. W., van Roon, P., & John, M. S. (2007). Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity. Ear Hear, 28, 542-557. (Pubitemid 47026225)
42. Ross, B., Draganova, R., Picton, T. W., et al. (2003). Frequency specificity of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res, 186, 57-68. (Pubitemid 37476449)
43. Royster, L. H., Royster, J. D., & Thomas, W. G. (1980). Representative hearing levels by race and sex in North Carolina industry. J Acoust Soc Am, 68, 551-566.
44. Sininger, Y. S., & Cone-Wesson, B. (2004). Asymmetric cochlear processing mimics hemispheric specialization. Science, 305, 1581.
45. Sininger, Y. S., & Cone-Wesson, B. (2006). Lateral asymmetry in the ABR of neonates: evidence and mechanisms. Hear Res, 212, 203-211.
46. Sininger, Y. S., Cone-Wesson, B., & Abdala, C. (1998). Gender distinctions and lateral asymmetry in the low-level auditory brainstem response of the human neonate. Hear Res, 126, 58-66. (Pubitemid 29003092)
47. Stevens, S. S. (1936). The localization of actual sources of sound. Am J Psychol, 48, 297-306.
48. Thivierge, J., & Côté, R. (1990). Brain-stem auditory evoked response: normative values in children. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 77, 309-313. (Pubitemid 20269384)
49. Thornton, A. R., Marotta, N., & Kennedy, C. R. (2003). The order of testing effect in otoacoustic emissions and its consequences for sex and ear differences in neonates. Hear Res, 184, 123-130. (Pubitemid 37211351)
50. Trune, D. R., Mitchell, C., & Phillips, D. S. (1988). The relative importance of head size, gender and age on the auditory brainstem response. Hear Res, 32, 165-174. (Pubitemid 18066691)
51. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
52. Wegel, R. L., & Lane, C. E. (1924). The auditory masking of one pure tone by another and its possible relation to the dynamics of the inner ear. Physics Rev, 23, 266-285.
53. Yin, T. C. T. (2002). Neural mechanisms of encoding binaural localization cues in the auditory brainstem. In D. Oertel, A. N. Popper, R. R. Fay (Eds.), Integrative functions in the mammalian auditory pathway. Springer handbook of auditory research (vol. 15, pp. 99-159). New York: Springer-Verlag.
54. Zatorre, R. J., & Belin, P. (2001). Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex, 11, 946-953. (Pubitemid 32946228)