Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 542-557

  Picton, Terence W ^a,b   Van Roon, Patricia ^a   John, M Sasha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; SIMULATION; SOUND INTENSITY; STEADY STATE;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 34347381146     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc2a7     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cohen, L. T., Rickards, F. W., Clark, G. M. (1991). A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2467-2479.
2. Cornelisse, L. E., Gagné, J. P., Seewald, R. C. (1991). Ear level recordings of the long-term average spectrum of speech. Ear and Hearing, 12, 47-54.
3. Dimitrijevic, A., John, M. S., van Roon, P., Purcell, D. W., Adamonis, J., Ostroff, J., Nedzelski, J. M., Picton, T. W. (2002). Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steadystate responses. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13, 205-224.
4. Dobie, R. A., Wilson, M. J. (1996). A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2236-2246.
5. Dolphin, W. F., Mountain, D. C. (1993). The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 3215-3226.
6. Draganova, R., Ross, B., Borgmann, C., Pantev, C. (2002). Auditory cortical response patterns to multiple rhythms of AM sound. Ear and Hearing, 23, 254-265.
7. Dubno, J. R., Schaefer, A. B. (1992). Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2110-2121.
8. Elberling, C., Wahlgreen, O. (1985). Estimation of auditory brainstem response, ABR, by means of Bayesian inference. Scandinavian Audiology, 14, 89-96.
9. Herdman, A. T., Stapells, D. R. (2001). Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scandinavian Audiology, 30, 41-49.
10. Herdman, A. T., Stapells, D. K. (2003). Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 237-248.
11. Hoke, M., Ross, B., Wickesberg, R., Lütkenhöner, B. (1984). Weighted averaging: Theory and application to electric response audiometry. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 57, 484-489.
12. Humes, L. E., Espinoza-Varas, B., Watson, C. S. (1988). Modeling sensorineural hearing loss, I: Model and retrospective evaluation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 188-202. Erratum in: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 2458.
13. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., Picton, T. W. (2001a). Weighted averaging of steady-state responses. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 555-562.
14. John, M. S., Lins, O. G., Boucher, B. L., Picton, T. W. (1998). Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology, 37, 59-82.
15. John, M. S., Picton, T. W. (2000a). MASTER: A windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comparative Methods in Programs for Biomedicine, 61, 125-150.
16. John, M. S., Picton, T. W. (2000b). Human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones: Phase and latency measurements. Hearing Research, 141, 57-79.
17. Kaf, W. A., Durrant, J. D., Sabo, D. L., Boston, R. J., Taubman, L. B., Kovacyk, K. (2006). Validity and accuracy of electric response audiometry using the auditory steady-state response: Evaluation in an empirical design. International Journal of Audiology, 45, 211-223.
18. Levene H.. (1960) Robust Tests For Equality of Variances. In I. Olkin, S.G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W.G. Madow, H.B. Mann (Eds). Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling (pp, 278-292) Palo Alto, Calif: Stanford University Press.
19. Lins, O. G., Picton, P. E., Picton, T. W., Champagne, S. C., Durieux-Smith, A. (1995). Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3051-3063.
20. Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Boucher, B. L., Durieux-Smith, A., Champagne, S. C., Moran, L. M., Perez-Abalo, M. C., Martin, V., Savio, G. (1996). Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear and Hearing, 17, 81-96.
21. Luts, H., Wouters, J. (2005). Comparison of MASTER and AUDERA for measurement of auditory steady-state responses. International Journal of Audiology, 44, 244-253.
22. Norcia, A. M., Tyler, C. W., Hamer, R. D., Wesemann, W. (1989). Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP. Vision Research, 29, 627-637.
23. Parker, D., O'Dwyer D. (1998). The 40 Hz modulation-following response: Prediction of low-frequency uncomfortable loudness levels in normally hearing adults. Audiology, 37, 372-381.
24. Picton, T. W., John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., Purcell, D. W. (2003). Human auditory steady-state responses. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 177-219.
25. Picton, T. W., Dimitrijevic, A., Perez-Abalo, M. C., van Roon P. (2005). Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16, 143-156.
26. Rance, G., Briggs, R. J. (2002). Assessment of hearing in infants with moderate to profound impairment: the Melbourne experience with auditory steady-state evoked potential testing. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology Suppl, 189, 22-28.
27. Rance, G., Rickards, F. (2002). Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 13, 235-245.
28. Rance, G., Rickards, F. W., Cohen, L. T., De Vidi, S., Clark, G. M. (1995). The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear and Hearing, 16, 499-507.
29. Regan, D. (1975). Colour coding of pattern responses in man investigated by evoked potential feedback and direct plot techniques. Vision Research, 15, 175-183
30. Regan D. Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine. New York: Elsevier, 1989.
31. Rodriguez, R., Picton, T., Linden, D., Hamel, G., Laframboise, G. (1986). Human auditory steady state responses: Effects of intensity and frequency. Ear and Hearing, 7, 300-313.
32. Vander Werff, K. R., Brown, C. J. (2005). Effect of audiometric configuration on threshold and suprathreshold auditory steady-state responses. Ear and Hearing, 26, 310-326.
33. Yearsley, J. spatialPattern, a Matlab program to generate 1/f noise [Mathworks Web Site] (2004). Available at: http://www.mathworks.com/ matlabcentral/fileexchange/. Accessed March 23, 2006.