The order of testing effect in otoacoustic emissions and its consequences for sex and ear differences in neonates

Hearing Research

Volumn 184, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 123-130

  Thornton, A Roger D ^a   Marotta, Nicholas ^b   Kennedy, Colin R ^c  

^a ROYAL SOUTH HANTS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c SOUTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Neonate; Order effect; Otoacoustic emission; Right left difference; Sex difference

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EAR; HEARING; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NEWBORN; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; STIMULUS SECRETION COUPLING;

EID: 0141638471     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00234-X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aidan D., Lestang P., Avan P., Bonfils P. Characteristics of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOES) in neonates. Acta Otolaryngol. 117:1997;25-30.
2. Bilger R., Matthies M.L., Hammel D.R., Demorest M.E. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J. Speech Hear. Res. 33:1990;418-432.
3. Burns E.M., Arehart K.H., Campbell S.L. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:1992;1571-1575.
4. Burns E.M., Campbell S.L., Arehart K.H. Longitudinal measurements of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in infants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:1994;385-394.
5. Cassidy J.W., Ditty K.M. Gender differences among newborns on a transient otoacoustic emissions test for hearing. J. Music Ther. 38:2001;28-35.
6. Driscoll C., Kei J., McPherson B. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in 6-year-old school children: a normative study. Scand. Audiol. 29:2000;103-110.
7. Ferguson M.A., Smith P.A., Davis A.C., Lutman M.E. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a representative population sample aged 18 to 25 years. Audiology. 39:2000;125-134.
8. Hunter M.F., Kimm L., Cafarelli-Dees D., Kennedy C.R., Thornton A.R.D. Feasibility of otoacoustic emission detection followed by ABR as a universal neonatal screening test for hearing impairment. Br. J. Audiol. 28:1994;47-51.
9. Kei J., McPherson B., Smyth V., Latham S., Loscher J. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants: effects of gender, ear asymmetry and activity status. Audiology. 36:1997;61-71.
10. Kennedy C.R., Kimm L., Dees D.C., Evans P.I.P., Hunter M., Lenton S., Thornton A.R.D. Otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in the newborn. Arch. Dis. Child. 66:1991;1124-1129.
11. Khalfa S., Morlet T., Micheyl C., Morgon A., Collet L. Evidence of peripheral hearing asymmetry in humans: Clinical implications. Acta Otolaryngol. 117:1997;192-196.
12. Khalfa S., Micheyl C., Veuillet E., Collet L. Peripheral auditory lateralization assessment using TEOAEs. Hear. Res. 121:1998;29-34.
13. McFadden D. A speculation about the parallel ear asymmetries and sex differences in hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 68:1993;143-151.
14. McFadden D., Pasanen E.G. Otoacoustic emissions and quinine sulphate. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:1994;3460-3474.
15. McFadden D., Loehlin J.C. On the heritability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: A twins study. Hear. Res. 85:1995;181-198.
16. McFadden D. Sex differences in the auditory system. Dev. Neuropsych. 14:1998;261-298.
17. McFadden D. Masculinizing effects on otoacoustic emissions and auditory evoked potentials in women using oral contraceptives. Hear. Res. 142:2000;23-33.
18. McFadden D. Otoacoustic emissions as a window into prenatal development and sexual differentiation. Semin. Hear. 22:2001;347-360.
19. Morlet T., Lapillonne A., Ferber C. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates: prevalence and gender effect. Hear. Res. 90:1995;44-54.
20. Newmark M., Merlob P., Bresloff I., Olsha M., Attias J. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions: inter-aural and gender differences in newborns. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 8:1997;133-139.
21. Rosen S. Presbycusis study of a relatively noise-free population in the Sudan. Ann. Otol. 71:1962;727-742.
22. Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Murphy W.J., Tubis A. New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects. Hear. Res. 71:1993;170-182.
23. Thornton A.R.D., Kimm L., Kennedy C.R., Cafarelli-Dees D. External- and middle-ear factors affecting evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Br. J. Audiol. 27:1993;319-327.
24. Thornton, A.R.D., 1999. Maturation of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first few days of life. In: Grandori, F., Collet, L., Ravazzani, P. (Eds.), Otoacoustic Emissions from Maturation to Ageing. Series in Audiology Number 1. Decker Europe, London, pp. 21-32.
25. Thornton A.R.D., Kimm L., Kennedy C. Methodological factors involved in neonatal screening using evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response testing. Hear. Res. 182:2003;65-76.
26. Whitehead M.L. Slow variations of the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 53:1991;269-280.