Frequency specificity of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses

Hearing Research

Volumn 186, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 57-68

  Ross, Bernhard ^a,b   Draganova, Rossitza ^a   Picton, Terence W ^b   Pantev, Christo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amplitude modulation; Auditory steady state responses; Frequency specificity; Magnetoencephalography; Primary auditory cortex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SOUND; STEADY STATE;

EID: 0345255911     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00299-5     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Biebel U.W., Langner G. Evidence for interactions accross frequency channels in the inferior colliculus of awake chinchilla. Hear. Res. 169:2002;151-168.
2. Butler R.A. Effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44:1968;945-950.
3. Dolphin W.F. The envelope following response to multiple tone pair stimuli. Hear. Res. 110:1997;1-14.
4. Dolphin W.F., Mountain D.C. The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1993;3215-3226.
5. Dolphin W.F., Chertoff M.E., Burkard R. Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:1994;2225-2234.
6. Draganova R., Ross B., Borgmann C., Pantev C. Auditory cortical response patterns to multiple rhythms of AM sound. Ear Hear. 23:2002;254-265.
7. Efron, B., Tibshirani, A., 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
8. Engelien A., Schulz M., Ross B., Arolt V., Pantev C. A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices. Hear. Res. 148:2000;153-160.
9. Fujiki N., Jousmaki V., Hari R. Neuromagnetic responses to frequency-tagged sounds: a new method to follow inputs from each ear to the human auditory cortex during binaural hearing. J. Neurosci. 22:2002;RC205.
10. Galambos R., Makeig S., Talmachoff P.J. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:1981;2643-2647.
11. Godey B., Schwartz D., de Graaf J.B., Chauvel P., Liegeois-Chauvel C. Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112:2001;1850-1859.
12. Griffiths S.K., Chambers R.D. The amplitude modulation-following response as an audiometric tool. Ear Hear. 12:1991;235-241.
13. Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., Stapells D.R., Scherg M., Picton T.W. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr. 15:2002;69-86.
14. John M.S., Picton T.W. MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 61:2000;125-150.
15. John M.S., Lins O.G., Boucher B.L., Picton T.W. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology. 37:1998;59-82.
16. John M.S., Purcell D.W., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 13:2002;246-259.
17. Krishnan A. Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels. Hear. Res. 166:2002;192-201.
18. Lins O.G., Picton T.W. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96:1995;420-432.
19. Mackersie C., Down K.E., Stapells D.R. Pure-tone masking profiles for human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. Hear. Res. 65:1993;61-68.
20. Mauer, G., Döring, W.H. 1999. Psychophysics, Physiology and Models of Hearing. World Scientific, Singapore.
21. Näätänen R., Sams M., Alho K., Paavilainen P., Reinikainen K., Sokolov E.N. Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69:1988;523-531.
22. Oates P., Stapells D.R. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to brief tones. I. High-pass noise masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1997;3597-3608.
23. Oates P., Stapells D.R. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to brief tones. II. Derived response analyses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1997;3609-3619.
24. Pantev C., Pantev M. Derived brain stem responses by means of pure-tone masking. Scand. Audiol. 11:1982;15-22.
25. Pantev C., Lagidze S., Pantev M., Kevanishvili Z. Frequency-specific contributions to the auditory brain stem response derived by means of pure-tone masking. Audiology. 24:1985;275-287.
26. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lehnertz K., Lutkenhoner B., Anogianakis G., Wittkowski W. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69:1988;160-170.
27. Pantev C., Bertrand O., Eulitz C., Verkindt C., Hampson S., Schuierer G., Elbert T. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94:1995;26-40.
28. Pantev C., Roberts L.E., Elbert T., Ross B., Wienbruch C. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear. Res. 101:1996;62-74.
29. Perez-Abalo M.C., Savio G., Torres A., Martin V., Rodriguez E., Galan L. Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear. 22:2001;200-211.
30. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Proulx G.B. Human auditory sustained potentials. I. The nature of the response. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45:1978;186-197.
31. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Proulx G.B. Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45:1978;198-210.
32. Picton T.W., Skinner C.R., Champagne S.C., Kellett A.J., Maiste A.C. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82:1987;165-178.
33. Regan, D., 1989. Human Brain Electrophysiology. Elsevier, New York, pp. 271-278.
34. Romani G.L. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by steady state neuromagnetic measurements. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 432:1986;33-34.
35. Ross B., Borgmann C., Draganova R., Roberts L.E., Pantev C. A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:2000;679-691.
36. Ross B., Picton T.W., Pantev C. Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field. Hear. Res. 165:2002;68-84.
37. Sams M., Salmelin R. Evidence of sharp frequency tuning in the human auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 75:1994;67-74.
38. Stapells, D.R., Picton, T.W., Durieux-Smith, A., 1993. Electrophysiologic measures of frequency-specific auditory function. In: Jacobson, J.T. (Eds.), Principles and Applications of Auditory Evoked Potentials. Allyn and Bacon, New York, pp. 251-283.
39. Wallace M.N., Shackleton T.M., Palmer A.R. Phase-locked responses to pure tones in the primary auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 172:2002;160-171.
40. Wu C., Stapells D.R. Pure-tone masking profiles for human auditory brain-stem and middle latency responses to 500-Hz tones. Hear. Res. 78:1994;169-174.
41. Wunderlich J.L., Cone-Wesson B.K. Effects of frequency and complexity on the mismatch negativity and other components of the cortical auditory-evoked potential. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109:2000;1526-1537.