Optimization of culture conditions for production of yeast biomass using bamboo wastewater by response surface methodology

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 100, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 3613-3617

  Li, Xin ^a   Ouyang, Jia ^a   Xu, Yong ^a   Chen, Mu ^a   Song, Xiangyang ^a   Yong, Qiang ^a   Yu, Shiyuan ^a  

^a NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bamboo wastewater; Candida utilis; Plackett Burman design; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

CANDIDA UTILIS; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; CULTURE CONDITIONS; FERMENTOR; INITIAL PH; PLACKETT-BURMAN DESIGN; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SHAKE-FLASK CULTIVATIONS; YEAST BIOMASS; YEAST EXTRACTS;

BAMBOO; BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING; BIOMASS; CHARGE COUPLED DEVICES; DESIGN; FERMENTATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WASTEWATER; YEAST;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS;

ACETIC ACID; AMMONIUM SULFATE; ARABINOSE; CALCIUM CHLORIDE; CELLOBIOSE; FORMIC ACID; FURFURAL; GLUCOSE; GLYCEROL; LEVULINIC ACID; MAGNESIUM SULFATE; POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; XYLITOL; XYLOSE;

BIOMASS; METHODOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; WASTEWATER; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BAMBOO WASTEWATER; BIOMASS; CANDIDA UTILIS; CULTURE OPTIMIZATION; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; INOCULATION; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; TEMPERATURE; WASTE WATER;

BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; FERMENTATION; FUNGI; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; HYDROLYSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SASA; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

PICHIA JADINII;

EID: 64849104293     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Almeida e Silva J.B., Lima U.A., Taqueda M.E.S., and Guaragna F.G. Use of response surface methodology for selection of nutrient levels for culturing Paecilomyces variotii in eucalyptus hemicellulosic hydrolyzate. Bioresour. Technol. 87 (2003) 45-50
2. Chen X.C., Bai J.X., Cao J.M., Li Z.J., Xiong J., Zhang L., Hong Y., and Ying H.J. Medium optimization for the production of cyclic adenosine 3′, 5′-monophosphate by Microbacterium sp. no. 205 using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009) 919-924
3. Christen P., Domenech F., Páca J., and Revah S. Evaluation of four Candida utilis strains for biomass, acetic acid and ethyl acetate production from ethanol. Bioresour. Technol. 68 (1999) 193-195
4. Gélinas P., and Barrette J. Protein enrichment of potato processing waste through yeast fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 98 (2007) 1138-1143
5. Ghose T.K. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 59 (1987) 257-268
6. He Y., and Tan T. Use of response surface methodology to optimize culture medium for production of lipase with Candida sp. 99-125. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 43 (2006) 9-14
7. Kondo K., Miura Y., Sone H., Kobayashi K., and Lijima H. High-level expression of a sweet protein, monellin, in the food yeast Candida utilis. Nat. Biotechnol. 15 (1997) 453-457
8. Larsson S., Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal B., Tengborg C., Stenberg K., Zacchi G., and Nilvebran N. The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 24 (1999) 151-159
9. Li J., Ma C., Ma Y., Li Y., Zhou W., and Xu P. Medium optimization by combination of response surface methodology and desirability function: an application in glutamine production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74 (2007) 563-571
10. Li X.Y., Liu Z.Q., and Chi Z.M. Production of phytase by a marine yeast Kodamaea ohmeri BG3 in an oats medium: optimization by response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008) 6386-6390
11. Li X., Xu T., Ma X., Guo K., Kai L., Zhao Y., Jia X., and Ma Y. Optimization of culture conditions for production of cis-epoxysuccinic acid hydrolase using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008) 5391-5396
12. 2-induced oxidative stresses in Candida utilis. Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2008) 350-355
13. Mertens B., Liu H., Belcher B., Ruiz-Pérez M., Fu M., and Yang X. Spatial patterns and processes of bamboo expansion in Southern China. Appl. Geography 28 (2008) 16-31
14. Miller G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 31 (1959) 426-428
15. Nigam P., and Vogel M. Bioconversion of sugar industry by-products-molasses and sugar beet pulp for single cell protein production by yeasts. Biomass Bioenergy 1 (1991) 339-345
16. Plackett R.L., and Burman J.P. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika 33 (1946) 305-325
17. Rajoka M.I., Khan S.H., Jabbar M.A., Awan M.S., and Hashmi A.S. Kinetics of batch single cell protein production from rice polishings with Candida utilis in continuously aerated tank reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 97 (2006) 1934-1941
18. Rajoka M.I., Kiani M.A.T., Khan S., Awan M.S., and Hashmi A. Production of single cell protein from rice polishings using Candida utilis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20 (2004) 297-301
19. Scurlock J.M.O., Dayton D.C., and Hames B. Bamboo: an overlooked biomass resource?. Biomass Bioenergy 19 (2000) 229-244
20. Sluiter A., Hames B., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J., and Templeton D. Determination of Sugars, Byproducts, and Degradation Products in Liquid Fraction Process Samples. Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42623 (2006), National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA
21. Tobajas M., and Garcia-Calvo E. Determination of biomass yield for growth of Candida utilis on glucose: black box and metabolic descriptions. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15 (1999) 431-438
22. Wang X., Wang X., Yin M., Xiao Z., Ma C., Lin Z., Wang P.G., and Xu P. Production of uridine 5′-monophosphate by Corynebacterium ammoniagenes ATCC 6872 using a statistically improved biocatalytic process. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 76 (2007) 321-328
23. Xiao Z.J., Liu P.H., Qin J.Y., and Xu P. Statistical optimization of medium components for enhanced acetoin production from molasses and soybean meal hydrolysate. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74 (2007) 61-68
24. Zheng S., Yang M., and Yang Z. Biomass production of yeast isolate from salad oil manufacturing wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 96 (2005) 1183-1187