Formation and differentiation of avian somite derivatives

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 638, Issue , 2008, Pages 1-41

  Christ, Bodo ^a   Scaal, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APOPTOSIS; BLOOD VESSEL; CARTILAGE; CELL FATE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL TYPE; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DERMIS; ECTODERM; EMBRYO SEGMENTATION; ENDOTHELIUM; EPITHELIUM; FOWL; GASTRULATION; HISTOGENESIS; MESENCHYME; MESODERM; MORPHOGENESIS; MUSCLE; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT; MYOTOME; NEURAL TUBE; NONHUMAN; NOTOCHORD; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCLEROTOME; SKIN CELL; SOMITE; STEM CELL; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHICK EMBRYO; DERMIS; EPITHELIAL-MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT; QUAIL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMITES;

AVES; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 64749089404     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09606-3_1     Document Type: Review

References (331)

1. I. Baer von ICE. Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thierc. Beobachtung und ReAexion. Bornträger. Königsberg 1828.
2. RaffRA. Developmental mechanisms in the evolution of animal form: Origins and evolvability of body plans. In : Early life on earth. Columbia University Press. New York. 1994:489.
3. Balfour FM. Handbuch der vergleichenden Embryologic. 2. Band. Fischer jena, 1881.
4. Remak R. Untersuchungen über die Entwickelung der Wirbelthiere. Reimer. Berlin. 1850.
5. Williams LW The sornites of the chick. Am J Anar 1910: 11:55-100.
6. Christ B, Ordahl CPo Early stages of chick somite development. Anat Embryol1995: 191:381-396.
7. Gossler A. Hrabe de Angelis M. Somirogencsis. Curr Top Dev Bioi 1998; 38:225 -287.
8. Christ B, Jacob HJ. Jacob M. Experimental analysis of somitogenesis in the chick embryo. Z Anat Entwicld-Gesch 1972: 138:82-97.
9. Christ B. Schmidt C. Huang R et al. Segmenracion of the vertebrate body. Anat Embryol 1998: 197:1-8.
10. Brand-Saberi B. Wilting J. Ebensperger C er al. The formarion of somite compartments in the avian embryo. Inc J Dev Bioi 1996: 40:411-420.
11. Brand-Saberi B. Christ B. Evolution and development of distinct lineages derived from somites. CUrt Top Dev Bioi 2000: 48:1-42.
12. Aoyama H. Asamoro K. Determination of somite cells: independence of celI differentiation and morphogenesis. Development 1988: 104:15-28.
13. Christ B. Brand-Saberi B. Grim M et al. Local signalling in dermomyotomal cell type specification. Anat EmbryoI1992: 186:505-510.
14. Aoyama H. Development plasticity of the prospective dermatome and the prospective sclerotome region of an avian somite. Dev Growth Differ 1993: 35:507-519.
15. Ordahl CPo Le Douarin NM. Two myogenic lineageswithin the developing somite. Development 1992: 114:339-353.
16. Brent AE. Tabin CJ. Development regulation of somite derivatives: muscle. cartilage and tendon. CUrt Opin Genet Dev 2002; 12:548-557.
17. Hatschek 1980. Cited after Williams LW. The somites of the chick. Am J Anat 1910: 11:55-100.
18. His W. Untersuchungen über die erste Anlage des Wirbelthicrleibes. Die erste Entwicldung des Hühnchensim Ei. Vogel Leipzig 1868.
19. Linker C. Lesbros C. Gros J et al. beta-Catenin-dependent Wnt signalling controls the epithelial organisation of somites through the activation of paraxis. Development 2005: 132:3895-3905.
20. Geetha-Loganathan P, Nimmagadda S, Huang R et al. Regulation of ectodermal Wnt6 expression by the neural tube is transduced by dermomyotomal Wnt 11:a mechanism of derrnomyotomal Iip sustainment. Development 2006; 133:2897-2904.
21. Ordahl CP, Berdougo E, Venters S] et al. The dermomyotorne dorsomedial lip drives growth and morphogenesis of both the primary myotome and dermomyotome epithelium. Development 2001; 128:1731-1744.
22. Venters SJ, Ordahl CPo Persistent myogenic capacity of the dermomyotome dorsomediallip and restriction of myogenic competence. Development 2002; 129:3873.
23. Dhoot GK, Gustafsson MK, Ai X et al. Regulation of Wnt signaling and embryo pattering by an extracellular sulfatase Science 2001; 293:1663-1666.
24. Lee CS, Buttitta LA, May NR et al. SHH-N upregulates Sfrp2 to mediate its competitive interaction with WNTI and WNT4 in the somitic mesoderm. Development 2000; 127:109-118.
25. Lee CS, Buttitta L, Fan CM. Evidence that the WNT-inducible growth arrest-specific gene 1 encodes an antagonist of sonic hedgehog signaling in the somite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 21001; 98:11347-11352.
26. Spence MS, Yip], Erickson CA. The dorsal neural tube organizes the dermamyotome and induces axial myocytes in the avian embryo. Development 1996; 122:231-241.
27. Dietrich S, Schubert FR, Lumsden A. Control of dorsoventral pattern in the chick paraxial mesoderm. Development 1997; 124:3895-3908.
28. Fan CM, Lee CS, Tessier-Lavigne M. A role for WNT proteins in induction of dermomyotome. Dev Bioi 1997; 191:160-165.
29. Capdevila], Tabin C, Johnson R.L. Control of dorsoventral somite patterning by Wnt-l and beta-catenin. Dev Bioi 1998; 193:182-194.
30. Ikeya M, Takada S. Wnt signaling from the dorsal neural tube is required for the formation of the medial dermomyotome. Development 1998; 125:4969-4976.
31. Wagner ], Schmidt C, Nikowits W]r et al. Compartmentalization of the somite and myogenesis in chick embryos are influenced by wnt expression. Dev Bioi 2000; 228:86-94.
32. Fan CM, Tessier-Lavigne M. Patterning of mammalian somites by surface ectoderm and notochord: evidence for sclerotome induction by a hedgehog homolog. Cell 1994; 79:1175-1186.
33. Galli LM, Willert K, Nusse R et al. A proliferative role for Wnt-3a in chick somites. Dev Bioi 2004; 269:489-504.
34. Ben-Yair R, Kahane N, Kalcheim C. Coherent development of dermomyotome and dermis from the entire mediolateral extent of the dorsal somite. Development 2003; 130:4325-4336.
35. Ahmed MU, Cheng L, Dietrich S. Establishment of the epaxial-hypaxial boundary in the avian myotome. Dev Dyn 2006; 235:1884-1894.
36. Scaal M, Wiegreffe C. Somite compartments in anamniotes. Anat Embryol 2006; (Berl) Epub 2006 Sep 28.
37. Brennan C, Amacher SL, Currie PD. Somitogenesis. Results Probl Cell Differ 2002; 40:271-297.
38. Krenn V, Gorka P, Wachtler F er aI. On the origin of cells determined to form skeletal muscle in avian embryos. Anat Embryol 1988; 179:49-54.
39. Nicolas ]F, Mathis L, Bonnerot C et aI. Evidence in the mouse for self-renewingstem cells in the formation of a segmented longitudinal structure, the myotome. Development 1996; 122:2933-2946.
40. Selleck MA, Stern CD. Fate mapping and cell lineage analysis of Hensen's node in the chick embryo. Development 1991; 112:615-626.
41. Psychoyos D, Stern CD. fates and migratory routes of primitive streak cells in the chick embryo. Development 1996, 122:1523-1534.
42. Eloy-Trinquet S, Mathis L, Nicolas ]E Retrospective tracing of the developmental lineage of the mouse myotome. Curr Top Dev Bioi 2000; 47:33-80.
43. George-Weinstein M, Gerhart], Reed R. Skeletal myogenesis: the preferred pathway of chick embryoepiblast cells in vitro. Dev Bioi 1996; 173:279-291.
44. Holtzer H, Schultheiss T, Dilullo C. Autonomous expression of the differentiation programs of cells in the cardiac and skeletal myogenic lineages. Ann NY Acad Sci 1990; 599:158-169.
45. Fomenou MD, Scaal M, Stockdale FE et aI. Cells of all somitic compartments are determined with respect to segmental identity. Dev Dyn 2005; 233:1386-1393.
46. Rong PM, Teillet MA, Ziller C et al. The neural tube/notochord complex is necessary for vertebral but not limb and body wall striated muscle differentiation. Development 1992; 115:657-672.
47. Borman WH, Yorde DE. Barrier inhibition of a temporal neuraxial influence on early chick somitic myogenesis.Dev Dyn 1994; 200:68-78.
48. Buffinger N, Stockdale FE. Myogenic specification in somites: induction by axial structures. Development 1994; 120:1443-1452.
49. Stern HM, Brown AM, Hauschka SD. Myogenesis in paraxial mesoderm: preferential induction by dorsal neural tube and by cells expressing Wnt-1. Development 1995; 121:3675-3686.
50. Cossu G, Kelly R, Tajbakhsh S et aI. Activation of different myogenic pathways: myf-5 is induced by the neural tube and MyoD by the dorsal ectoderm in mouse paraxial mesoderm. Development 1996; 122:429-437.
51. Stern HM, Hauschka SD. Neural tube and notochord promote in vitro myogenesis in single somite explants. Dev BioI 1995; 167:87-103.
52. Miinsterberg AE, Kitajewski J, Bumcrot DA er al. Combinatorial signaling by Sonic hedgehog and Wnt family members induces myogenic bHLH gene expression in the somite. Genes Dev 1995; 9:2911-2922.
53. Munsterberg AE, Lassar AB. Combinatorial signals from the neural tube, floor plate and notochord induce myogenic bHLH gene expression in the somite. Development 1995; 121:651-660.
54. Gustafsson MK, Pan H, Pinney DF et al. Myf5 is a direct target of long-range Shh signaling and Gli regulation for muscle specification. Genes Dev 2002; 16:114-126.
55. Teboul L, Hadchouel J, Daubas P et al. The early epaxial enhancer is essential for the initial expression of the skeletal muscle determination gene MyfS but not for subsequent, multiple phases of somitic myogenesis.Development 2002; 129:4571-4580.
56. Chiang C, Litingrung Y,Lee E. Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature 1996; 383:407-413.
57. Duprez D, Fournier-Thibault C, Le Douarin N. Sonic hedgehog induces proliferation of committed skeletal muscle cells in the chick limb. Development 1998; 125:495-505.
58. Teillet M, Watanabe Y, Jeffs P et al. Somic hedgehog is required for survival of both myogenic and chondrogenic somitic lineages. Development 1998; 125:2019-2030.
59. Marcelle C, Ahlgren S, Bronner-Fraser M. In vivo regnlation of somite differentiation and proliferation by Sonic Hedgehog. Dev BioI 1999; 214:277-287.
60. Marcelle C, Stark MR, Bronner-Fraser M. Coordinate actions of BMPs, Wnts, Shh and noggin mediate patterning of the dorsal somite. Development 1997; 124:3955-3963.
61. Linker C, Lesbros C, Stark MR et aI. Intrinsic signals regnlate the initial steps of myogenesis in vertebrates. Development 2003; 130:4797-4807.
62. Rudnicki MA, Schnegelsberg PN, Stead RH et al. MyoD or Myf-5 is required for the formation of skeletal muscle. Cell 1993; 75:1351-1359.
63. Maroto M, Reshef R, Munsterberg AE et al. Ectopic Pax-3 activates MyoD and Myf-5 expression in embryonic mesoderm and neural tissue. Cell 1997; 89:139-148.
64. Tajbakhsh S, Rocancourr D, Cossu G et aI. Redefining the genetic hierarchies controlling skeletal myogenesis: Pax-3 and Myf-5 act upstream of MyoD. Cell 1997; 89:127-138.
65. Pourquie 0, Fan CM, Coltey M et aI. Lateral and axial signals involved in avian somite patterning: a role for BMP4. Cell 1996; 84:461-471.
66. Ott MO, Bober E, LyonsG et al. Early expression of the myogenic regulatory gene, myf-5, in precursor cells of skeletal muscle in the mouse embryo. Development 1991; Ill: 1097-1107.
67. Pownall ME, Emerson CP Jr. Sequential activation of three myogenic regulatory genes during somite morphogenesis in quail embryos. Dev Bioi 1992; 151:67-79.
68. Reshef R, Maroto M, Lassar AB. Regulation of dorsal somitic cell fates: BMPs and Noggin control the timing and pattern of myogenic regulator expression. Genes Dev 1998; 12:290-303.
69. Christ B, Jacob HJ, Jacob M. Regional determination of early embryonic muscle primordium. Experimental studies on quail and chick embryos. Verh Anat Ges 1978; 353-357.
70. Bardeen BI. The development of the musculature in the body wall in the pig. Johns Hopkins Hospital Reporr 1900; 9:367.
71. Hamilton HL. Lillie's development of the chick. An introduction to embryology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1952; New York.
72. Boyd ID. Development of the striated muscle. In: Bourne GH (ed) Structure and Function of Muscle. Academic Press 1960; New York.
73. Mestres P, Hinrichsen K. The histogenesis of somites in the chick. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1976; 36:669.
74. Kahane N, Cinnamon Y,Kalcheim C. The cellular mechanism by which the dermomyotome contributes to the second wave of myotome development. Development 1998; 125:4259-4271.
75. Kahane N, Cinnamon Y,Kalcheim C. The origin and fate of pioneer myotomal cells in the avian embryo. Mech Dev 1998; 74:59-73.
76. Cinnamon Y, Kahane N, Kalchcim C. Characterization of the early development of specific hypaxial muscles from the ventrolateral myotome. Development 1999; 126:4305-4315.
77. Cinnamon Y, Kahane N, Bachelet I et al. The sublip domain-a distinct pathway for myotome precursors that demonstrate rostral-caudal migration. Development 2001; 128:341-351.107. Houzelstein D, Auda-Boucher G, Cheraud Y et al. The homeobox gene Msxl is expressed in a subset of somites and in muscle progenitor cells migrating into the forelimb. Development 1999; 126:2689-2701.
78. Goulding M, Lumsden A, Paquette A]. Regulation of Pax-3 expression in the dermomyotome and its role in muscle development. Development 1994; 120:957-971.
79. Anakwe K, Robson L, Hadley]. Wnt signaling regulates myogenic differentiation in the developing avian wing. Development 2003; 130:3503-3514.
80. Scaal M, Bonafede A, Dathe V et al. SF/HGF is a mediator between limb patterning and muscle development. Development 1999; 126:4885-4893.
81. Dietrich S, Abou-Rebyeh F. Brohmann H. The role ofSF/HGF and c-Met in the development of skeletal muscle. Development 1999; 126:1621-1629.
82. Marics I, Padilla F, Guillemot JF et al. FGFR4 sigualing is a neccessary step in limb muscle differentiation. Development 2002; 129:4559-4569.
83. Tajbakhsh S, Buckingham ME. Mouse limb muscle is determined in the absence of the earliest myogenic factor myf-5. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:747-751.
84. Geetha-Loganathan P, Nimmagadda S, Prols F et al. Two different pathways during limb myogenesis. Verh Ant Ges 2005; 100:20.
85. Geetha-Loganathan P, Nimmagadda S, Prols F et al. Ectodermal Wnt-6 promotes Myf5-dependent avian limb myogenesis. Dev Bioi 2005; 288:221-233.
86. Buckingham M, Bajard L, Chang T et al. The formation of skeletal muscle: from somite to limb. J Anat 2003; 202:59-68.
87. Schemainda H. Expenmentelle Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der Zungenmuskulatur beim Hohnerembryo. Verh Anat Ges 1981; 75:501.
88. Huang R, Zhi Q, Izpisua-Belmonre JC et al. Origin and development of the avian tongue muscles. Anat Embryol1999; 200:137-152.
89. Huang R, Lang ER, Otto WR et al. Molecular and cellular analysis of embryonic avian tongue development. Anat Embryol 2001; 204:179-187.
90. Reichert CB. Das Entwickelungsleben im Wirbelthierreich. 1838.
91. Kolliker A. Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen und der hoheren Thiere. 1879; Engelmann, Leipzig.
92. Goette A. Entwickelungsgeschichte der Unke (Bombinator igneus) als Grundlage einer vergleichenden Morphologie der Wirbelthiere. 1875; Leopold Voss, Leipzig.
93. Minot CS. Human Embryology. 1892; Wood and Co, New York.
94. Murray PDF. The origin of the dermis. Nature 1928; 122:609.
95. Le Douarin NM. Particularites du noyau inrerphasique chez la caille japonaise (Coturnix c. Japonica).Utilisation de ses particularites comrne rnarquage biologique dans les recherches sur les interactions tissulaires er les migrations cellulairs au cours de I'ontogenese. Bull Bioi Fr Bel 1969; 103:435-452.
96. Le Douarin NM. A biological cell labeling technique and its use in experimental embryology. Dev Bioi 1973; 30:217-222.
97. Mauger A. The role of somitic mesoderm in the development of dorsal plumage in chick embryos. I. Origin, regulative capacity and determination of the plumage-forming mesoderm. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1972; 28:313-341.
98. Christ B, Jacob M, Jacob H]. On the origin and development of the ventrolateral abdominal muscles in the avian embryo. An experimental and ultrastructural study. Anat Embryol 1983; 166:87-10 I.
99. Le Lievre CS, Le Douarin NM. Mesenchymal derivatives of the neural crest: analysis of chimaeric quail and chick embryos. J Embryol exp Morph 1975; 34:125-154.
100. Noden DM. The role of the neural crest in patterning of avian cranial skeletal, connective and muscle tissues. Dev Bioi 1983; 96:144-165.
101. Conly GF, Coltey PM, Le Douatin NM. The developmental fate of the cephalic mesoderm in quail-chick chimeras. Development 1992; 114:1-15.
102. Olivera-Martinez I, Coltey M, Dhouailly D et al. Mediolateral somitic origin of ribs and dermis determined by quail-chick chimeras. Development 2000; 127:4611-4617.
103. Olivera-Martinez I, Thelu J, Teillet MA er al. Dorsal dermis development depends on a signal from the dorsal neural tube, which can be substituted by Wnt-I. Mech Dev 2001; 100:233-244.
104. Atit R, Sgaier SK, Mohamed OA et al. Beta-catenin activation is necessary and sufficient to specify the dorsal dermal fate in the mouse. Dev Bioi 2006; 296:164-176.
105. Sengel P. Morphogenesis of skin. Cambridge University Press, 1976; Cambridge.
106. Brill G, Kahane N, Carmeli C er al. Epithelial-mesenchymal conversion of dermatome progenitors requires neural tube-derived signals: characterization of the role of neutrophin-3. Development 1995; 121:2583-2594.
107. Marcelle C, Lesbros C, Linker C. Somite patterning: a few more pieces of the puzzle. Results Probl Cell Differ 2002; 38:81-108.
108. Houzelstein D, Cheraud Y, Auda-Boucher G et al. The expression of the homeobox gene Msxl reveals two populations of dermal progenitor cells originating from the somites. Development 2000; 127:2155-2164.
109. Buchner G, Broccoli V, Bulfone A et al. MAEG, an EGF-repeat containing gene, is a new marker associated with dermatome specification and morphogenesis of its derivatives. Mech Dev 2000; 98:179-182.
110. Olivera-Martinez I, Missier S, Fraboulet S et al. Differential regulation of the chick dorsal thoracic dermal progenitors from the medial dermomyotome. Development 2002; 129:4763-4772.
111. Duong TD, Erickson CA. MMP-2 plays an essential role in producing epithelial- mesenchymal transformations in the avian embryo. Dev Dyn 2004; 229:42-53.
112. Christ B, Huang R, Wilting]. The development of the avian vertebral column. Anat Embryol 2000; 202:179-194.
113. Sorrell ]M, Caplan AI. Fibroblast heterogeneity: more than skin deep. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:667-675.
114. Wessells NK. Morphology and proliferation during early feather development. Dev Bioi 1965; 12:131-153.
115. Li L, Cserjesi P, Olson EN. Dermo-l; a novel twist-related bHLH protein expressed in the developing dermis. Dev Bioi 1995; 172:280-292.
116. Scaal M, Fiichtbauer EM, Brand-Saberi B. Cdcrmo-I expression indicates a role in avian skin development. Anat Embryol 2001; 203:1-7.
117. Scaal M, Prols F, Fiichtbauer EM et al. BMPs induce dermal markers and ectopic feather tracts. Mech Dev 2002; 110:51-60.
118. Sengel P. Pattern formation in skin development. Inr ] Dev Bioi 1990; 34:33-50.
119. Dhouailly D. Dermo-epidermal interactions during morphogenesis of cutaneous appendages in amniotes. Front Matrix Bioi 1977; 4:86-121.
120. Chuong CM. Molecular Basis of Epithelial Appendage Morphogenesis. R.G. Landes Company, 1998; Austin, TX.
121. Pispa], Thesleff I. Mechanisms of ectodermal organogenesis. Dev Bioi 2003; 262:195-205.
122. Wilting J, Christ B, Yuan L er al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of embryonic haemangiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Naturwissenschaften 2003; 90:433-448.
123. Wilting J, Braud-Saberi B, Kurz H et al. Development of the embryonic vascular system. Cell Mol Bioi Res 1995; 41:219-232.
124. Pardanaud L, Luton D, Prigent M et al. Two distinct endothelial lineages in ontogeny, one of them related to hemopoiesis. Development 1996; 122:1363-1371.
125. Kardon G, Campbell ]K, Tabin C]. Local extrinsic signals determine muscle and endothelial cell fate and patterning in the vertebrate limb. Dev Cell 2002; 3:533-545.
126. He L, Papoutsi M, Huang R et al. Three different fates of cells migrating from somites into the limb bud. Anat Embryol2003; 207:29-34.
127. Huang R, Zhi Q, Patel K et al. Dual origin and segmental organisation of the avian scapula. Development 2000; 127:3789-3794.
128. Wang B, He L, Ehehalt F et al. The formation of the avian scapula blade takes place in the hypaxial domain of the somites and requires somatopleure-derived BMP signals. Dev Bioi 2005; 287:11-18.
129. Tajbakhsh S, Rocancourt D, Buckingham M. Muscle progenitor cells failing to respond to positional cues adopt nonmyogenic fates in myf-5 null mice. Nature 1996; 384:266-270.
130. Solursh M, Fischer M, Meier S et al. The role of extracellular matrix in the formation of the sclerotome. J Embryol exp Morph 1979; 54:75-98.
131. Trelstad RL. Mesenchymal cell polarity and morphogenesis of chick cartilage. Dev Bioi 1977; 59:153-163.
132. Hirano S, Hirako R, Kajita N et al. Morphological analysisof the role of the neural tube and notochord in the development of somites. Anat Embryo11995; 192:445-457.
133. Burgess R, Rawls A, Brown D et al. Requirement of the paraxis gene for somite formation and musculoskeletal patterning. Nature 1996; 384:570-573.
134. Barnes GL, Alexander PG, Hsu CW er al. Cloning and characterization of chicken Paraxis: a regulator of paraxial mesoderm development and somite formation. Dev Bioi 1997; 189:95-111.
135. Ostrovsky D, Sanger]W, Lash JW. Somitogenesis in the mouse embryo. Cell Differ 1988; 23:17-26.
136. Hatra K, Takagi S, Hajime F er al. Spatial and temporal expression pattern of N- cadherin cell adhesion molecules correlated with morphogenetic processes of chicken embryos. Dev Bioi 1987; 120:215-227.
137. Duband ].-L, Dufour S, Hatta K et al. Adhesion molecules during somitogenesis in the avian embryo. J Cell Bioi 1987; 104:1361.
138. Takcichi M. The cadherins: cell-celladhesion molecules controlling animal morphogenesis. Development 1988: 102:630-655.
139. Dietrich S, Schubert FR, Gruss P et al. Altered Pax gene expression in mouse notochord mutants: the notochord is required to initiate and mainrain ventral identity in the somite. Mech Dev 1993: 44:189-207.
140. Koseki H, Wallin ], Wilting] et al. A role of Pax-I as a mediator of notochordal signals during the dorso-ventral specification of vertebrae. Development 1993; 119:649-660.
141. Peters H, Doll U, NiessingJ. Differential expression of the chicken Pax-l and Pax-9 gene. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis.Dev Dyn 1995; 203:1-16.
142. Walther C, Guenet ].-L, Simon D et al. Pax: A murine multigene family of paired box containing genes. Genomics 1991; 11:424-434.
143. Noll M. Evolution and role of Pax genes. CUrt Opin Genet Dev 1993: 3:595-605.
144. Deutsch U, Dressler GR, Gruss P. Pax I, a member of paired box homologous murine gene family, is expressed in segmented structures during development. Cell 1988: 53:617-626.
145. Ebensperger C, Wilting], Brand-Saberi B et al. Pax-I, a regulator of sclerotome development is induced by notochord and Ioorplate signals in avian embryos. Anat Embryol 1995: 191:297-310.
146. Borycki AG, Strunk K, SavaryRet al. Distinct signal/response mechanisms regulate pax 1 and QmyoD activation in sclerotomal and myotomallineages of quail sornites. Dev Bioi 1997; 185:185-200.
147. Balling R, Neubiiser A, Christ B. Pax genes and sclerotome development. Semin Cell Dev Bioi 1996: 7:129-136.
148. Müller TS, Ebensperger C, Neubiiser A et al. Expression of avian Pax-I and Pax-9 in the sclerotomes controlled by axial and lateral tissues, but intrinsically regulated in pharyngeal endoderm. Dev Bioi 1996: 178:403-417.
149. Borycki AG, Mendham L, Emerson CP Jr. Control of somite patterning by Sonic hedgehog and its downstream signal response genes. Development 1998; 125:777-790.
150. Buttitta L, Mo R, Hui CC et al. Interplays of Gli2 and Gli3 and their requirement in mediating Shh-dependent sclerotome induction. Development 2003; 130:6233-6243.
151. Johnson RL, Laufer E, Riddle RD er al. Ectopic expression of Sonic hedgehog alters dorsal-ventral patterning of somites. Cell 1994: 79:1165-1173.
152. Fan C.-M, Porter ]A, Chiang C er al. Long-range sclerotome induction by sonic hedgehog: direct role of the amino-terminal claevage product and modulation by the cyclic AMP signaling pathway. Cell 1995; 81:457-465.
153. Marti E, Takada R, Bumcrot DA et al. Distribution of Sonic hedgehog peptides in the developing chick and mouse embryo. Development 1995: 121:2537-2547.
154. McMahon ]A, Takada S, Zimmermann LB et al. Noggin-mediated antagonism of BMP signaling is required for growth and patterning of the neural tube and somite. Genes Dev 1998; 12:1438-1452.
155. Dockter ]L. Sclerotome induction and differentiation. In: Sornitogenesis, Part 2,(Ordahl CPo ed.) Academic Press, London, 2000; New York, 77.
156. Hoang BH, Thomas ]T, Abdul-Karim FW et al. Expression pattern of two Frizzled-relatedgenes, Frzb-I and Sfrp-I during mouse embryogenesis suggests a role for modulating action ofWnt family members. Dev Dyn 1998; 212:364-374.
157. Cauthen CA, Berdougo E, Sandler] er al. Comparative analysis of the expression patterns ofWnts and Frizzleds during early myogenesis in chick embryos. Mech Dev 2001; 104: 133-138.
158. Schubert FR, Mootoosamy RC, Walters EH et al. Wnt6 marks sites of epithelial transformations in the chick embryo. Mech Dev 2002: 114:143-148.
159. Rodriguez-Niedenfiihr M, Dathe V,Jacob H] er al. Spatial and temporal pattern of Wnt-6 expression during chick development. Anat Embryol 2003; 206:447-451.
160. Brand-Saberi B, Ebensperger C, Wilting J et al. The ventralizing effect of the notochord on somite differentiation in chick embryos. Anat Embryol1993: 188:239-245.
161. Wheelock M, Knudsen K. N-cadherin-associated proteins in chicken muscle. Differentiation 1991; 46:35-42.
162. Schmidt C, Stoeckelhuber M, McKinneli I et al. Wnt 6 regulates the epithelialisarion process of the segmental plate mesoderm leading to somite formation. Dev Bioi 2004; 271:198-209.
163. Hirsinger E, Duprez D, jouve C et al. Noggin acts downstream ofWnt and Sonic Hedgehog ro antagonize BMP4 in avian somite patterning. Development 1997: 124:4605-4614.
164. Amthor H, Conolly D, Patel K et al. The expression and regulation of follistatin and a follistatin-like gene (Iik) during avian somite compartmentalization and myogenesis.Dev Bioi 1996; 178:343-362.
165. Wilting], Kurz H, Brand-SaberiB et al. Kinetics and differentiation of somite cells forming the vertebral column: studies on human and chick embryos. Anat Embryol1994: 190:573-581.
166. Wilting J,Ebensperger C, Muller TS et al. Pax-I in the development of the cervico-occipital transitional zone. Anat Embryol1995: 192:221-227.
167. Huang R. Stolte D. Kurz H et al. Ventral axial organs regulate expression of myotomal Fgf-8 that influences rib development. Dev BioI 2003; 255:30-47.
168. Stolte D, Huang R, Christ B. Spatial and temporal pattern of Fgf-8 expression during chicken development. Anat Embryol2002; 205:1-6.
169. Teillet M.-A. Watanabe Y,Jeffs P et al. Sonic hedgehog is required for survival of both myogenic and chondrogenic somitic lineages. Development 1998; 125:2019-2030.
170. Hebrok M, Wertz K, Fuchrbauer EM. Mvrwisr is an inhibitor of muscle differentiation. Dev Biol 1994; 165:537-544.
171. Fiichtbauer E.-M. Expression of m-rwist during post-implantation development of the mouse. Dev Dyn 1995; 204:316-322.
172. Spicer DB. Rhee J, Cheung WL et al. Inhibition of myogenic bHLH and MEF2 transcription factors by the bHLH protein twist. Science 1996; 272:476-1480.
173. Bialek P, Kern B. YangX et al. A twist code determines the onset of osteoblast differentiation. Dev Cell 2004; 6:423-435.
174. Hornik C. Braud-Saberi B, Rudloff S et al. TWIST is an integrator of Shh, FGF and BMP signaling. Anat Embryol 2004; 209:31-39.
175. Furumoto TA. Miura N, Akasaka T et al. Notochord-dependent expression of MFH1 and Pax1 cooperates to maintain the proliferation of sclerotome cells during the vertebral column development. Dev BioI 1999; 210:15-29.
176. Sanders E]. Cell death in the avian sclerotome. Dev BioI 1997; 192:551-563.
177. Huang R. Zhi Q, Wilting J. The fate of somicocoele cells in avian embryos. Anat Embryol 1994; 190:243-250.
178. Huang R. Zhi Q, Neubuser A et al. Function of somite and somitocoele cells in the formation of the vertebral motion segment in avian embryo. Acta Anat 1996; 155:231-241.
179. Sanders EJ. Parker E. Ablation of axial structures activates apoptotic pathways in somite cells of the chick embryo. Anat Embryol 2001; 204:389-398.
180. Schmidt C. Christ B, Patel K et al. Experimental induction of BMP-4 expression leads to apoptosis in the paraxial and lateral plate mesoderm. Dev BioI 1998; 202:253-263.
181. Monsoro-Burq AH, Duprez D, Watanabe Yet al. The role of bone morphogenetic proteins in vertebral development. Development 1996; 122:3607-3616.
182. Christ B. Die Entwicklung der Korperwandmetamerie, experimentelle Untersuchungen an Hiihnerembryonen. Habilitationsschrifr 1975; Ruhr-Universitar Bochum.
183. Ebner V. von. Urwirbel und Neugliederung der Wirbelsaule. Sitzungsber Akad Wiss Wien 1888; III/97:194-206.
184. Rickmann M. Fawcett LW; Keynes RJ. The migration of neural crest cells and the growth of motor axons through the rostral half of the chick somite. J Embryol exp Morph 1985; 90:437.
185. Keynes RJ, Stern CD. Segmentation in the vertebrate nervous system. Nature 1984; 310:786-789.
186. Bronner-Fraser M. Analysis of the early stages of trunk neural crest migration in avian embryos using monoclonal antibody HNK-1. Dev BioI 1986; 115:44-55.
187. Teillet M.-A. Kalcheim C, Le Douarin NM. Formation of the dorsal root ganglion in the avian embryo: segmental origin and migratory behavior of neural crest progenitor cells. Dev Biol 1987; 120:329.
188. Hrabe de Angelis M, McIntyre J. Gossler A. Maintenance of somite borders in mice requires the Delta homologue DIll. Nature 1997; 386:717-721.
189. Del Amo FF. Smith DE, Swiatek PJ et al. Expression pattern of Motch, a mouse homolog of Drosophila Notch, suggests an important role in early post-implantation mouse development. Development 1992; 115:737-744.
190. Reaume AG. Conlon RA. Zirngibl R et al. Expression analysis of a Notch homologue in the mouse embryo. Dev BioI 1992; 154:377-387.
191. Bettenhausen B. Hrabe de Angelis M. Simon D et al. Transient and restricted expression during mouse embryogenesis of Dill, a murine gene closely related to Drosophila Delta. Development 1995; 121:2407-2418.
192. Jen WC, Wettstein D. Turner D et al. The Notch ligand. X-Delta-I. mediates segmentarion of the paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos. Development 1997; 124:1169-1178.
193. del Barco Barranres I, Elia AJ. Wunsch K et al. Interaction between Notch signalling and Lunatic fringe during somite boundary formation in the mouse. Curt Bioi 1999; 9:470-480.
194. Rida PCG, Le Minh N. Jiang Y.-]. A Notch feeling of somite segmentation and beyond. Dev BioI 2004; 265:2-22.
195. Saga Y. Takeda H. The making of the somite. Molecular events in vertebrate segmentation. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2:835-845.
196. Stockdale FE. Nikovits W Jr. Christ B. Molecular and cellular biology of avian somite development. Dev Dyn 2000; 219:304-321.
197. Bussen M. Petry M. Schuster-Gessler K et al. The T-box transcription factor Tbxl8 maintains the separation of anterior and posterior somite compartments. Genes Dev 2004; 18:1209-1221.
198. Johnson J. Rhee J. Parsons SM et al. The anterior/posterior polarity of somites is disrupted in paraxis-deficient mice. Dev Bioi 2001; 229:176.
199. Corning HK. Ober die sogenannte Neugliederung der Wirbelsaule und iiber das Schicksal der Urwirbelhohle bei Reptilien. Morph Jb 1881; 17:611-622.
200. Bagnall KM. Higgins S. Sanders EJ. The contribution made by a single somite to the vertebral column: experimental evidence in support for resegmentarion using the chick-quail chimera model. Development 1988; 103:69-85.
201. Bagnall KM. Higgins S. Sanders EJ. The contribution made by a single somite to tissue within a body segment and assessment of their integration with similar cells from adjacent segments. Development 1989; 107:931-943.
202. Huang R. Zhi Q, Brand-Saberi B. New experimental evidence for somite resegmentation. Anat Embryol 2000a; 202:195-200.
203. Ewan KBR. Everett AW. Evidence for resegmentation in the formation of the vertebral column using the novel approach of retroviral-mediated gene transfer. Exp Cell Res 1992; 198:315-320.
204. Aoyama H, Asamoto K. The developmental fate of the rostral/caudal half of a somite for vertebra and rib formation: experimental confirmation of the resegmentation theory using chick-quail chimeras. Mech Dev 2000; 99:71-82.
205. Evans DJR. Contribution of somitic cells to the avian ribs. Dev Bioi 2003; 256:114-126.
206. Kieny M, Mauger A. Sengel P. Early regionalization of somitic mesoderm as studied by the development of axial skeleton of the chick embryo. Dev Bioi 1972; 28:142-161.
207. Jacob M, Christ B. Jacob HJ. Uber die regionale Determination des paraxialen Mesoderms junger Hiihnerernbryonen, Verh Anat Ges 1975; 69:263-269.
208. Burke AC, Nelson CE, Morgan BA et al. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 1995; 121:333-346.
209. Duboule D, Dolle P. The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. EMBO J 1989; 8:14971505.
210. Graham A. Papalopulu N, Krumlauf R. The murine and Drosophila homeobox dusters have common features of organization and expression. Cell 1989; 5:367-378.
211. Krumlauf R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 1994; 78:191.
212. Gruss P, KesselM. Axial specification in higher vertebrates, Curr Opin Genet Dev 1991; 1:204-210.
213. Kessel M. Molecular coding of axial positions by Hox genes. Semin Dev Bioi 1991; 2:367.
214. McGinnis W; Krumlauf R. Horneobox genes and axial pattering. Cell 1992; 68:283.
215. KesselM, Gruss P. Homeotic transformations of murine vertebrae and concomitant alteration of Hox codes induced by retinoic acid. Cell 1991; 67:89-104.
216. Condie BG. Capecchi MR. Mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of Hoxs-3 (Hox-4.l) exhibit anterior transformations of the first and second cervical vertebrae, the atlas and axis.Development 1993; 119:579.
217. Kostic D, Capecchi MR. Targeted disruption of the murine Hoxa-4 and Hoxa-6 genes result in homeotic transformations of the vertebral column. Mech Dev 1994; 46:231-247.
218. Medina-Martinez 0, Bradley A. Ramirez-Solis R. A large targeted deletion ofHoxbl-Hoxb9 produces a series of single segment anterior homeotic transformations. Dev Biol 2000; 222:71.
219. Lufkin T. Mark M, Hart CP et al. Homeotic transformation of the occipital bones of the skull by ectopic expression of a horneobox gene. Nature 1992; 359:835-841.
220. Kessel M. Balling R, Gruss P. Variations of cervical vertebrae afier expression of a Hox-1.1 rransgene mice. Cell 1990; 61:301.
221. Duboule D, Morata G. Colinearity and functional hierarchy among genes of the homeotic complexes. Trend Genet 1994; 10:358-364.
222. Boncinelli E, Simeone A, Acompora D et al. HOX gene activation by retinoic acid. Trends Genet 1991; 7:329.
223. KesselM. Respecification of vertebral identities by retinoic acid. Development 1992; 115,487.
224. Dubrulle J. McGrew MJ, Pourquie O. FGF signaling controls somite boundary position and regulates segmentation clock control of spatiotemporal Hox gene activation. Cell; 2001; 106:219-232. 106,219.
225. Zakany J. Kmita M. Alarcon P et al. Localized and transient transcription of Hox genes suggest a link between patterning and the segmentation clock. Cell 2001; 106:207-217.
226. Burke AC. Hox genes and the global patterning of the somitic mesoderm. Curr Top Dev Biol 2000; 47:155.
227. Monsoro-Burq AH and Le Douarin NM. Duality of molecular signaling involved in vertebral chondrogenesis. In: Ordahl CPo ed. Somitogenesis, Part 2. London. New York: Academic Press. 2000:43-75.
228. Sudo H, Takahashi Y, Tonegawa A er al. Inductive signals from the somatopleure mediated by bone morphogenetic proteins are essential for the formation of the sternal component of avian ribs. Dev Bioi 2001: 232:284-300.
229. Schweitzer R, ChyungJH, Murtaugh LC er al. Analysisof the tendon cell fate using Scleraxis,a specific marker for tendons and ligaments. Development 2001: 128:3855-3866.
230. Brent AE, Schweitzer R, Tabin C]. A somitic compartment of tendon progenitors. Cell 2003: 113:235-248.
231. Hall BK. Chondrogenesis of the somitic mesoderm. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Bioi 1977: 53:3.
232. Christ B, Wilting]. From somites to vertebral column. Ann Anat 1992: 174:23-32.
233. Christ B, Huang R, Wilting]. The development of the avian vertebral column. Anat Embryol 2000: 202:179-194.
234. Halata Z, Grim M, Christ B. Origin of spinal cord meninges sheaths of peripheral nerves and cutaneous receptors including Merkel cells. An experimental and ultrastructural study with avian chimeras. Anat Embryol 1990: 182:529-537.
235. Mittapalli VR, Huang R, Patel K er al. Arthrotome: a specific joint forming compartment in the avian somite. Dev Dyn 2005: 234:48-53.265.
236. Blechschmidt E. Die vorgeburdiche Entwicklungssradien des Menschen. Karger, Basel-196 I: New York.
237. Verbour A J. The development of the vertebral column. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Bioi 1985; 90:1-122.
238. Mansouri A, YokotaY,Wehr R et al. Paired-related murine homeobox gene expressed in the developing sclerotome, kidney and nervous system. Dev Dyn 1997; 210:53-65.
239. Neidhardt L, Lisperr A, Hermann BG. A mouse gene of the paired-related homeobox xlass expressed in the caudal somite compartment and in the developing vertebral column, kidney and nervous system. Dev Genes Evol 1997; 207:330-339.
240. Mansouri A, Voss AK, Thomas T et al. Uncx4.1 is required for the formation of the pedicles and proximal ribs and acts upstream ofPax-9. Development 2000; 127:2251-2258.
241. Leitges M, Neidhardt L, Haenig B er al. The paired homeobox gene Uncx4.1 specifiespedicles transverse processes and proximal ribs of the vertebral column. Development 2000; 127:2259-2267.
242. Schragle J, Huang R, Christ B et al. Control of the temporal and spatial Uncx4.1 expression in the paraxial mesoderm of avian embryos. Anat Embryol 2004;
243. Christ B, Jacob HJ, Jacob M. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der brustwand beim Hiihnerembryo. Experientia 1974: 30:1449-1451.
244. Henderson DJ, Conway SJ, Copp A]. Rib truncations and fusions in the Sp2H mouse reveal a role for Pax3 in specification of the ventro-lateral and posterior parts of the somite. Dev Bioi 1999; 209:143-158.
245. Tallquist MD, Weismann KE, Hellstrom M et al. Early myotome specification regulatesPDGFA expression and axial skeleton development. Development 2000; 127:5059-5070.
246. Grass S, Arnold HH, Braun T. Alterations in somite pattering of Myf-5-deficient mice. A possible role for FGF-4 and FGF-6. Development 1996; 122:141-150.
247. Jacob M, Jacob HJ. Christ B. Die friihe Differentierung des chordanahen Bindegewebes, Raster- und transmissionselektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Huhnerembryonen, Experientia 1975b; 31:1083-1086.
248. Smits 0, Lefebre V. Sox 5 and Sox 6 are required for notochord extracellular matrix sheath formation, notochord cell survival and development of the nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs. Development 2003; 130:1135-II48.
249. Tondury G. Entwicklungsgeschichte und Fehlbildungen der Wirbelsaule. Hippokrates, 1958; Stuttgart.
250. Chen Z.-F, Behringer RR. Twist is required in head mesenchyme for cranial neural tube morphogenesis. Genes Dev 1995; 9:686-699.
251. Wallin J, Wilting J. Koseki H et al. The role of Pax-I in skeleton development. Development 1994: 120:II09-II21.
252. Miura N. Wanaka A, Tohyama M et al. MFHl, a new member of the forkhead domain family is expressed in developing mesenchyme. FEBS Lett 1993: 326:171-176.
253. Neubiiser A, Koseki H, Balling R. Characterisation and developmental expression of Pax9. a paired-box-containing gene related to Paxl. Dev Bioi 1995: 170:701-716.
254. Kaestner KH, Bleckmann SC, Monaghan AP et al. Clustered arrangement of winged helix 1 genes /kh-6 and MFH I. Possible implications for mesoderm development. Development 1996; 122:1751-1758.
255. Winnier GE. Hargett L, Hogan BLM. The winged helix transcription factor MFH 1 is required for proliferation and patterning of paraxial mesoderm in the mouse embryos. Genes Dev 1997: II:926-940.
256. Behrens A, Haigh J, Mechta-Grigoriou F er al. Impaired intervertebral disc formation in the absence of jun. Development 2003; 130:103-109.287. Peters H, Wilm B, Sakai N et al. Pad and Pax9 synergistically regulate vertebral column development. Development 1999; 126:5399-5407.
257. Barnes GL, Hsu Cw, Mariani BD et al. Chicken Par-I gene: Structure and expression during embryonic somite development. Differentiation 1996; 61:13-23.
258. Buchberger A, SchwarzerM, Brand T et al. Chicken winged-helix transcription factor cFKH-l prefigures axial and appendicular skeletal structures during chicken embryogenesis. Dev Dyn 1998; 212:94-101.
259. Mankoo BS, Skuntz S, Hassegan 1 et al. The concerted action of Meox horneobox genes is required upstream of genetic pathways essential for the formation, patterning and differentiation of somites. Development 2003; 130:4655-4664.
260. Mankoo BS, Collins NS, Ashby P et al. Mou is a component of the genetic hierarchy controlling limb muscle development. Nature 1999; 400:69-73.
261. Kraus F, Haenig B, Kispcrt A. Cloning and expression analysis of the mouse T-box gene Tbx 18. Mech Dev 2001; 100:83-86.
262. Holtzer H. Morphogenetic influence of the spinal cord on the axial skeleton and musculature. Anat Rec 1951; 109:373-374.
263. Holtzer H. An experimental analysisof rhe development of the spinal column: the dispensability of the notochord. J Exp Zoo11952a; 121:573-591.
264. Holtzer H. An experimental analysisofthe development of the spinal column. I. Response pf precartilage cells to size variations of the spinal cord. J ExpZoo11952b; 121:121-148.
265. Holtzer H, Detwiler SR. An experimental analysis of the development of the spinal column. III, Induction of skeletogenous cells. J ExpZool 1953; 123:335-366.
266. Holtzer H, Detwiler SR. The dependence of somitic differentiation on the neural axis. Anat Rec 1954; 118:390.
267. Lash J, Holtzer S, Holtzer H. An experimental analysis of the development of the spinal column. Exp Cell Res 1957; 13:292-303.
268. Lash Jw, Hommes FA, Zilliken F.Induction of cell differentiation. I. The in vivo induction of vertebral cartilage with a low-molecular-weight tissue component. Biochim Biophys Acta 1962; 56:313-319.
269. Avery G, Chow M, Holtzer H. An experimental analysis of the development of the spinal column. V. Reactivity of chick somites. J Exp Zool 1956; 132:409-426.
270. Strudel G. L'action morphogene du rube nerveux et de la corde sur la differenciation de vertebres et des muscles vertebaux chez Iernbryon de poulet. Arch Anat Microsc Morphol Exp 1955; 44:209-235.
271. Strudel G. Induction de cartilage in vitro par l'extrait de rube nerveux et de chorde de l'embryon de poulet. Dev Bioi 1962; 4:67-86.
272. Christ B. Experimente zur Lageentwicklung der Somiten. Verh Anat Ges 1970; 64:555-564.
273. Murtaugh LC, Chyung JH, Lassar AB. Sonic hedgehog promotes somitic chondrogenesis by altering the cellular response to BMP signaling. Genes Dev 1999; 13:225-237.
274. Murtaugh LC, Zeng I, Chyung JH et al. The chick transcriptional repressor Nkx3.2 acts downstream of Shh to promote BMP-dependent axial chondrogenesis. Dev Cell 2001; 1:411-422.
275. Lettice LA, Purdie LA, Carlson GJ et al. The mouse bagpipe gene controls development of axial skeleton, skull and spleen. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:9655-9700.
276. Tribioli C, Lufkin T. The murine Bapx 1 homeobox gene plays a critical role in embryonic development of the axial skeleton and spleen. Development 1999; 126:5699-5711.
277. Akazawa H, Komuro I, Sugitani Y. Targeted disruption of the homeobox transcription factor Bapxl results in lethal skeletal dysplasia with asplenia and gastroduodenal malformation. Genes Cell 2000; 5:499-513.
278. Rodrigo I, Bovolenta P, Mankoo BS et al. Meox homeodomain proteins are required for Bapxl expression in the sclerotome and activate its transcription by direct binding to its promoter. Mol Cell Biol 2004: 24:2757-2766.
279. Rodrigo I, Hill RE, Balling R et al. Pax1 and Pax9 activate Bapx1 to induce chondrogenic differentiation in the sclerotome. Development 2003; 130:473-482.
280. Zeng I., Kempf H, Murtaugh LC er al. Shh establishes an NW.2/Sox9 autoregulatory loop that is maintained by BMP signals to induce somitic chondrogenesis. Genes Dev 2002: 16,1990-2005.
281. Bell OM, Leung KK, Wheatley SC et al. SOX9 directly regulates the type-II collagen gene. Nat Genet 16:174-178.
282. Healy C, Uwanohgo 0, Sharpe PT. Expression of the chicken Sox9 gene marks the onset of cartilage differentiation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1996; 785:261-262.
283. Bi W, Huang W, Whitworth OJ et al. Happloinsufliciency ofSox9 results in defective cartilage primordia and premature skeletal mineralization. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:6698-6703.
284. Watanabe Y, Le Douarin NM. A role for BMP-4 in the development of subcutaneous cartilage. Mech Dev 1996; 57: 69-78.
285. Iida K. Koseki H. Kakinuma H ct al. Essential role of the winged helix transcription factor MFH-l in aortic arch patterning and skeletogenesis. Development 1997; 124:4627-4638.
286. Freitas C. Rodrigues S. Charrier ]B et al. Evidence for medial/lateral specification and positional information within the presomitic mesoderm. Development 2001; 128:5139-5147.
287. Pourquie O. Coltey M. Breant C et al. Control of somite patterning by signals from the lateral plate. Proc Narl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:3219-3223.
288. Huang R, Zhi Q, Wilting] et al. Sclerotomal origin of the ribs. Development 2000b; 127:527-532.
289. Wilting J. Braud-Saberi B. Huang R er al. The angiogenic potential of the avian somite. Dev Dyn 1995b. 202:165-171.
290. Eichmann A. Marcelle C. Breant C et al. Two molecules related to the VEGF receptor are expressed in early endothelial cells during avian embryonic development. Mech Dev 1993; 42:33-48.
291. Nimmagadda S. Geetha Loganathan P. Wilting] er al. Expression pattern ofVEGFR-2 (Quekl ) during quail development. Anat Embryol2004; 20:219-224.
292. Nimmagadda S, Geetha Loganathan P, Christ B er al. BMP-4 and noggin control embryonic blood vessel formation by antagonistic regulation ofVEGFR-2 (~ekl) expression. Dev Bioi 2005; 280:100-110.
293. Norris WE, Stem CD. Keynes R]. Molecular differences between the rostral and caudal halves of the sclerotome in the chick embryo. Development 1989; 105:541.
294. Tosney KW: Cell and cell-interactions that guide motor axons in the developing chick embryo. Bio Essays 1991; 13:17-24.
295. Davies ]A. Cook GM. Stem CD et al. Isolation from chick somites of a g1ycoptotein fraction that causes collapses of dorsal root ganglion growth cones. Neuron 1990; 4:11-19.
296. Wang HU. Anderson D]. Eph family transmembrane ligands can mediate repulsive guidance of trunk neural crest cell migration and motor axon outgrowth. Neuron 1997; 18:383.
297. Henkemeyer M. Marengere LEM, McGlade] et al. Immunolocalization of the Nuk receptor tyrosine kinase suggests roles in segmental patterning of the brain and axonogenesis. Oncogene 1994; 9:1001-1008.
298. Ohta K. Nakamura M, Hirokawa K er al. The receptor kinase. Cek8, is transiently expressedon subtypes of motoneurons in the spinal cord during development. Mech Dev 1996; 54:59-69.
299. Robinson V. Smith A. Felnniken AM et al. Role of Eph receptors and ephrins in neural crest pathfinding. Cell Tissue Res 1997; 290:265-274
300. Tan S.-S, Crossin KL, Hoffman S et al. Asymmetricexpressionin somite of cytoactin and irs proteoglycan ligand is correlated with neural crest cell distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 84:7981-7988.
301. Mackie E J. Tucker RP, Halfier W et al. The distribution of tenscin coincides with pathway of neural crest cell migration. Development 1988; 102:237-256.
302. Layer PG. Alber A, Rathjen FG. Sequential activation of buryrylcholinesrerase in motoneurons and myotoms preceding growth of motor axons. Development 1988; 102:387-396.
303. Goldstein RS. Teiller, MA. Kalcheim C. The microenvironment created by grafting multiple rostral half-somites is mitogenic for neural crest cells. Proc Narl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4476-4480.
304. Goldstein RS. Avivi C. Geffen R. Initial axial level-dependent differences in size of avian dorsal root ganglia are imposed by the sclerotome. Dev BioI 1995; 168:214-222.
305. Stern CD. Keynes R]. Interactions between somite cells: the formation and maintenance of segment boundaries in the chick embryo. Development 1987; 99:261- 272.
306. Goldstein RS. Kalcheim C. Determination of epithelial half-somites in skeletal morphogenesis. Development 1992; 116:441-445.
307. Oakley RA. Tosney KW: Peanut agglutinin and chondroidn-e-sulfate are molecular markers for tissues that act as barriers to axon advance in the avian embryo. Dev BioI 1991; 47- 156.
308. Kerr RSE. Newgreen DF. Isolation and characterization of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans from embryonic quail that influence neural crest cell behavior. Dev Bioi 1997; 192:108-115.
309. Landolt RM, Vaugham L. Winterhalter KH et al. Versican is selectivelyexpressed in embryonic tissues that act as barriers to neural crest cell migration an axon outgrowth. Development 1995; 121:2303.
310. Eickholdt B]. Mackenzie SL, Graham A et al. Evidence for collapsin-I functioning in the control of neural crest migration in both trunk and hindbrain regions. Development 1999; 126:2181-2189.
311. Debby-Brafmann A, Burstyn-Cohen T, Klar A er al. F-spondin is expressed in somite regions avoided by neural crest cells and mediates the inhibition of distinct somitic domains to neural crest migration. Neuron 1999; 22:475-488.
312. Bohme C. Lichtmikroskopische Untersuchungen iiber die Strukrur des Leptomeninx encephalis bei Gallus domesticus. Z Anat Enrwickl-Gesch 1973; 140:215-236.
313. Hochstetter F.Ober die Entwicklungund Differenzierungder Hiillen des Riickenmarkers beim Menschen. Morph]b 1934; 74:1-104.
314. O'Rahilly R. MiilIer F. The meninges in human development. J Neuropath exp Neurol 1986; 45:588-608.
315. Hanincec P, Grim M. Localization of dipeptidylpeptidase IV and alkaline phosphatase in developing spinal cord meninges and peripheral nerve covernings of the rat. Int ] Devl Neuroscience 1990; 8:175-185.
316. Marin F, Nieto MA. Expression of chicken slug and snail in mesenchymal components of the developing central nervous system. Dev Dyn 2004; 230:144-148.
317. Kurz H, Ginner T, Eggli PS et aL First blood vessels in the avian neural tube are formed by a combination of dorsal angioblast immigration and ventral sprouting of endothelial cells. Dev BioI 1996; 173:133-147.
318. Hogan KA, Ambler CA, Chapman DL et aI. The neural tube patterns vessels developmentally using the VEGF signaling pathway. Development 2003; 131:1503-1513.
319. Brent AE, Braun T, Tabin CJ. Genetic analysis of interactions between the sornitic muscle, cartilage and tendon cell lineages during mouse development. Development 2005; 132:515-528.
320. Smith TG, Sweetman D, Patterson M et aI. Feedback interactions between MKP3 and ERK MAP kinase control scleraxis expression and the specification of rib progenitors in the developing chick somite. Development 2005; 132:1305-1314.
321. Folkman J, D'Amore P. Blood vessel formation: what is its molecular basis? Cell 1996; 87:1153-1155.
322. Parker LH, Schmidt M,J in S.-W et aL The endothelial-cell-derivedsecreted factor Egfl7 regulates vascular tube formation. Nature 2004; 428:754.
323. Pardanaud L, Dieterlen-Lievre F.Emergence of endothelial and hemopoietic cells in the avian embryo. Anat Embryol 1993; 187:107-114.
324. Klessinger S, Christ B. Axial structures control latarality in the distribution pattern of endothelial cells. Anat Embryol 1996; 193:319-330.
325. Carmeliet P. Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis, Nat Med 2000; 6:389-395.
326. Hagedorn M, Balke M, Schmidt A er aI. VEGF coordinates interaction of pericytes and endothelial cells during vasculogenesis and experimental angiogenesis. Dev Dyn 2004; 230:23-33.
327. Wilting J, Papoutsi M, Schneider M et aI. The lymphatic endothelium of the avian wing is of somitic origin. Dev Dyn 2000; 217:271-278.
328. Wilting J, Papoutsi M, Othmanrn-Hassan K et aI. Development of the avian lymphatic system. Microsc Res Tech 2001; 55:81-91.
329. Yamaguchi TP, Dumont D], Conlon RA et aI. fkl-I and fit-related receptor tyrosine kinase is an early marker for endothelial cell precursor. Development 1993; 118:489-498.
330. Tosney KW: Cell and cell-interactions that guide motor axonas in the developing chick embryo. Bio Essays 1991; 13:17-24.
331. Ring C, Hassell], Halfier w:Expression pattern of collagen IX and potential role in the segmentation of the peripheral nervous system. Dev BioI 1996; 180:41.