Surface physicochemical analysis of natural Lactococcus lactis strains reveals the existence of hydrophobic and low charged strains with altered adhesive properties

International Journal of Food Microbiology

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 2-9

  Giaouris, Efstathios ^a,b   Chapot Chartier, Marie Pierre ^b   Briandet, Romain ^a  

^a AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Biodiversity; Charge; Hydrophobicity; Lactococus lactis

Indexed keywords

LEWIS ACID; POLYSTYRENE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL WALL; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; CELL ASSAY; CELL SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; ELECTRICITY; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; IONIC STRENGTH; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MICROELECTROPHORESIS; MICROTITER PLATE ASSAY; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; SUBSPECIES; SURFACE PROPERTY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOFILMS; CELL WALL; ELECTROPHORESIS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ANIMALIA; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS;

EID: 64649095880     PISSN: 01681605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bellon-Fontaine M.-N., Rault J., and van Oss C.J. Microbial adhesion to solvents: a novel method to determine the electron donor/electron acceptor or Lewis acid-base properties of microbial cells. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 7 (1996) 47-53
2. Boonaert C.J.P., and Rouxhet P.G. Surface of lactic acid bacteria: relationships between chemical composition and physicochemical properties. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66 (2000) 2548-2554
3. Boonaert C.J.P., Dufrene Y.F., Derclaye S.R., and Rouxhet P.G. Adhesion of Lactococcus lactis to model substrata: direct study of the interface. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 22 (2001) 171-182
4. Bos R., van der Mei H.C., and Busscher H.J. Physico-chemistry of initial adhesive interactions-its mechanisms and methods for study. FEMS Microbiology Review 23 (1999) 179-230
5. Briandet R., Meylheuc T., Maher C., and Bellon-Fontaine M.-N. Listeria monocytogenes Scott A: cell surface charge, hydrophobicity, and electron donor and acceptor characteristics under different environmental growth conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65 (1999) 5328-5333
6. Briandet R., Herry J.M., and Bellon-Fontaine M.N. Determination of the van der Waals, electron-acceptor and electron-donor character of static microbial biofilms by contact angle measurements. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 21 (2001) 299-310
7. Carpentier B., and Cerf O. Biofilms and their consequences, with particular reference to hygiene in the food industry. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 75 (1993) 499-511
8. Champagne C.P., Lacroix C., and Sodini-Gallot I. Immobilized cell technologies for the dairy industry. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 14 (1994) 109-134
9. Chopin A., Chopin M.C., Moillo-Batt A., and Langella P. Two plasmid-determined restriction and modification systems in Streptococcus lactis. Plasmid 11 (1984) 260-263
10. Crow V.L., Gopal P.K., and Wicken A.J. Cell surface differences of lactococcal strains. International Dairy Journal 5 (1995) 45-68
11. Delcour J., Ferain T., Deghorain M., Palumbo E., and Hols P. The biosynthesis and functionality of the cell-wall of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek International Journal of General And Molecular Microbiology 76 (1999) 159-184
12. Dufrêne Y.F., van der Wal A., Norde W., and Rouxhet P.G. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of whole cells and isolated cell walls of gram-positive bacteria: comparison with biochemical analysis. Journal of Bacteriology 179 (1997) 1023-1028
13. Dunne W.M. Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately?. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 15 (2002) 155-166
14. Elliot J.A., Collins M.D., Pigott N.E., and Facklam R.R. Differentiation of Lactococcus lactis and Lactococcus garvieae from humans by comparison of whole-cell protein patterns. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 29 (1991) 2731-2734
15. Gasson M.J. Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO 712 and other lactic streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. Journal of Bacteriology 154 (1983) 1-9
16. Habimana O., Legoff C., Juillard V., Bellon-Fontaine M.-N., Buist G., Kulakauskas S., and Briandet R. Role of cell wall proteinase PrtP in the adhesion of lactococci to solid surfaces. BMC Microbiology 2 (2007) 7-36
17. Kelly W., and Ward L. Genotypic vs. phenotypic biodiversity of Lactococcus lactis. Microbiology 148 (2002) 332-333
18. Kives J., Guadarrama D., Orgaz B., Rivera-Sen A., Vazquez J., and SanJose C. Interactions in biofilms of Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris and Pseudomonas fluorescens cultured in cold UHT milk. Journal of Dairy Sciences 88 (2005) 4165-4171
19. Lepeuple A.S., Van Gemert E., and Chapot-Chartier M.-P. Analysis of the bacteriolytic enzymes of the autolytic Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris strain AM2 by renaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: identification of a prophage-encoded enzyme. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64 (1998) 4142-4148
20. Leriche V., Chassaing D., and Carpentier B. Behaviour of L. monocytogenes in an artificially made biofilm of a nisin-producing strain of Lactococcus lactis. International Journal of Food Microbiology 51 (1999) 169-182
21. Luo H., Wan K., and Wang H.H. High-frequency conjugation system facilitates biofilm formation and pAMβ1 transmission by Lactococcus lactis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71 (2005) 2970-2978
22. Ly M.H., Naitali-Bouchez M., Meylheuc T., Bellon-Fontaine M.-N., Le T.M., Belin J.-M., and Wache Y. Importance of bacterial surface properties to control the stability of emulsions. International Journal of Food Microbiology 112 (2006) 26-34
23. Ly M.H., Vo N.H., Le T.M., Belin J.-M., and Wache Y. Diversity of the surface properties of Lactococci and consequences on adhesion to food components. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 52 (2006) 149-153
24. Ly M.H., Calvin J.F., Cachon R., Le T.M., Belin J.-M., and Wache Y. Relationship between the presence of the citrate permease plasmid and high electron-donor surface properties of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis. FEMS Microbiology Letters 268 (2006) 166-170
25. Mariani C., Briandet R., Chamba J.F., Notz E., Carnet-Pantiez A., Eyoug R.N., and Oulahal N. Biofilms ecology of wood shelves of the French raw milk smear cheese "Reblochon de Savoie". Journal of Dairy Sciences 90 (2007) 1653-1661
26. Mercier C., Durrieu C., Briandet R., Domakova E., Tremblay J., Buist G., and Kulakauskas S. Positive role of peptidoglycan breaks in lactococcal biofilm formation. Molecular Microbiology 46 (2002) 235-243
27. Merritt K., and An Y.H. Factors influencing bacterial adhesion. In: An Y.H., and Friedman R.J. (Eds). Handbook of Bacterial Adhesion (2000), Humana Press, Totowa, NJ 53-72
28. Mozes N., Leonard A.J., and Rouxhet P.G. On the relations between the elemental surface composition of yeasts and their charge and hydrophobicity. Biochimica and Biophysica Acta 945 (1988) 324-334
29. Nomura M., Kobayasi M., Narita T., Kimoto-Nira H., and Okamoto T. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Lactococcus lactis from milk and plants. Journal of Applied Microbiology 101 (2006) 396-405
30. Oddone G.M., Lan C.Q., Rawsthorne H., Mills D.A., and Block D.E. Optimization of fed-batch production of the model recombinant protein GFP in Lactococcus lactis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 96 (2007) 1127-1138
31. Ponttharangkul T., and Demirci A. Effects of fed-batch fermentation and pH profiles on nisin production in suspended-cell and biofilm reactors. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology 73 (2006) 73-79
32. Poortinga A.T., Bos R., Norde W., and Busscher H.J. Electric double layer interactions in bacterial adhesion to surfaces. Surface Science Reports 47 (2002) 1-32
33. Rademaker J.L.W., Herbet H., Starrenburg M.J.C., Naser S.M., Gevers D., Kelly W.J., Hugenholtz J., Swings J., and van Hylckama Vlieg J.E.T. Diversity analysis of dairy and non-dairy Lactococcus lactis isolates, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme and (GTC)5-PCR fingerprinting. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73 (2007) 7128-7137
34. Razatos A., Ong Y.-L., Sharma M.M., and Georgiou G. Molecular determinants of bacterial adhesion monitored by atomic force microscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 95 (1998) 11059-11064
35. Rodrigues L.R., Teixera J.A., van der Mei H.C., and Oliveira R. Physicochemical and functional characterization of a biosurfactant produced by Lactococcus lactis 53. Colloiods Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 49 (2006) 79-86
36. Salama M.S., Sandine W.E., and Giovannoni S.J. Isolation of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris from nature by colony hybridization with rRNA probes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59 (1993) 3941-3945
37. Schar-Zammaretti P., and Ubbink J. The cell wall of lactic acid bacteria: surface constituents and macromolecular conformations. Biophysic Journal 85 (2003) 4076-4092
38. Siezen R.J., Renckens B., van Swam I., Peters S., van Kranenburg R., Kleerebezem M., and de Vos W.M. Complete sequences of four plasmids of Lactococcus lactis subs. cremoris SK11 reveal extensive adaptation to the dairy environment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71 (2005) 8371-8382
39. Siezen R.J., Starrenburg M.J.C., Boekhorst J., Renckens B., Molenaar D., and van Hylckama Vlieg J.E.T. Genome-scale genotype-phenotype matching of two Lactococcus lactis plant isolates identifies adaptation mechanisms to the plant niche. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74 (2008) 424-436
40. Tanous C., Chambellon E., Le Bars D., Delespaul G., and Yvon M. Glutamate dehydrogenase activity can be transmitted naturally to Lactococcus lacti strains to stimulate amino acid conversion to aroma compounds. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72 (2006) 1402-1409
41. Van der Mei H.C., Brokke P., Dankert J., Feijen J., Rouxhet P.G., and Busscher H.J. Physicochemical surface properties of nonencapsulated and encapsulated coagulase-negative staphylococci. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 55 (1989) 2806-2814
42. Van Hylckama Vlieg J.E.T., Rademaker J.L.W., Bachmann H., Molenaar D., Kelly W.J., and Siezen R.J. Natural diversity and adaptative responses of Lactococcus lactis. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 17 (2006) 183-190
43. Van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Lyklema J., Norde W., Schraa G., and Zehnder A.J.B. The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53 (1987) 1893-1897
44. Van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Lyklema J., Norde W., Schraa G., and Zehnder A.J.B. Electrophoretic mobility and hydrophobicity as a measure to predict the initial steps of bacterial adhesion. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53 (1987) 1898-1901
45. Van Merode A.E.J., van der Mei H.C., Busscher H.J., and Krom B.P. Influence of culture heterogeneity in cell surface charge on adhesion and biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. Journal of Bacteriology 188 (2006) 2421-2426
46. Van Oss C.J. Forces interfaciales en milieux aqueux (1996), Ed. Masson, Paris
47. Van Oss C.J., Chaudhury M.K., and Good R.J. Interfacial Lifshitz-van der Waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems. Chemical Reviews 88 (1988) 927-941
48. Zhao T., Doyle M.P., and Zhao P. Control of Listeria monocytogenes in a biofilm by competitive-exclusion microorganisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70 (2004) 3996-4003