The role of gender identification in social dominance orientation: Mediating or moderating the effect of sex?

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 999-1012

  Snellman, Alexandra ^a   Ekehammar, Bo ^a   Akrami, Nazar ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 64549155697     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00469.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aiken, L. S. West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
2. Akrami, N. Ekehammar, B. (2006). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Their roots in Big Five personality factors and facets. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 117 126.
3. Baron, R. M. Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173 1182.
4. Bates, C. Heaven, P. C. L. (2001). Attitudes to women in society: The role of social dominance orientation and social values. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 43 49.
5. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155 162.
6. Dambrun, M., Duarte, S. Guimond, S. (2004). Why are men more likely to support group-based dominance than women? The mediating role of gender identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 287 297.
7. Dambrun, M., Guimond, S. Duarte, S. (2002). The impact of hierarchy-enhancing vs. attenuating academic major on stereotyping: The mediating role of perceived social norm. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7, 114 134.
8. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M. Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463 482.
9. Foels, R. Pappas, C. J. (2004). Learning and unlearning the myths we are taught: Gender and social dominance orientation. Sex Roles, 50, 743 757.
10. Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N. Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697 721.
11. Hoffman, R. M. Borders D. A. (2001). Twenty-five years after the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 39 55.
12. Hoffman, R. M., Hattie, J. A. Borders, L. D. (2005). Personal definitions of masculinity and femininity as an aspect of gender self-concept. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education, and Development, 44, 66 83.
13. Ivarsson, M. S. Ekehammar, B. (2001). Women's entry into management: Comparing women managers and non-managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16, 301 314.
14. Jost, T. J. Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209 232.
15. Levin, S. (2004). Perceived group status differences and the effects of gender, ethnicity, and religion on social dominance orientation. Political Psychology, 25, 31 48.
16. Lippa, R. (1995). Gender-related differences and psychological adjustment in terms of the Big Five and circumplex models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1184 1202.
17. Lippa, R. Arad, S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463 493.
18. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G. Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychological Methods, 7, 83 104.
19. Marongiu, S. Ekehammar, B. (1999). Internal and external influences on women's and men's entry into management. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 421 433.
20. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741 763.
21. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J. Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism, and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41 67.
22. Sidanius, J. Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York : Cambridge University Press.
23. Sidanius, J. Pratto, F. (2003). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of inequality: A reply to Schmitt, Branscombe, & Kappen and Wilson & Liu. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 207 213.
24. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998 1011.
25. Sidanius, J., Sinclair, S. Pratto, F. (2006). Social dominance orientation, gender, and increasing educational exposure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1640 1653.
26. Snellman, A. Ekehammar, B. (2005). Ethnic hierarchies, racial prejudice, and social dominance orientation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 1 12.
27. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed. Sociological methodology (pp. 290 312). Washington, DC : American Sociological Association.
28. Tajfel, H. Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin S. Worchel (Eds. The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33 47). Pacific Grove, CA : Brooks/Cole.
29. Van Hiel, A. Mervielde, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965 976.
30. Wilson, M. S. Liu, J. H. (2003) Social dominance and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 187 198.