Avian mobbing response is restricted by territory boundaries: Experimental evidence from two species of forest warblers

Ethology

Volumn 111, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 821-835

  Betts, Matthew G ^a   Hadley, Adam S ^a   Doran, Patrick J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^b Dartmouth College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREEDING SEASON; MOBBING; PASSERINE; PREDATION RISK; TERRITORIALITY;

AVES; DENDROICA CAERULESCENS; DENDROICA VIRENS; PASSERI;

EID: 17644383444     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01109.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bélisle, M. & Desrochers, A. 2002: Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models. Landscape Ecol. 17, 219-231.
2. Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A. & Mustoe, S. H. 2000: Bird Census Techniques, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London.
3. Bowman, J. 2003: Is dispersal distance of birds proportional to territory size? Can. J. Zool. 81, 195-202.
4. Chuang-Dobbs, H. C., Webster, M. S. & Holmes, R. T. 2001: Paternity and parental care in the black-throated blue warbler, Dendroica caerulescens. Anim. Behav. 62, 83-92.
5. Collias, N. E. & Collias, E. C. 1978: Group territory, cooperative breeding in birds, and a new dominance factor. Anim. Behav. 26, 308-309.
6. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. 2003: Birds in Forested Landscapes, http://www.birds.cornell.edu/bfl/survey_instructs/visit_protocols.html [Last Accessed 10th May 2005].
7. Curio, E. 1978: The adaptive significance of avian mobbing I. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. Z. Tierpsychol. 48, 175-183.
8. Curio, E. & Regelmann, K. 1986: Predator harassment implies a real deadly risk: a reply to Hennessy. Ethology 72, 75-78.
9. Desrochers, A. & Hannon, S. J. 1997: Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conserv. Biol. 11:1204-1210.
10. Desrochers, A. Bélisle, M. & Bourque, J. 2002: Do mobbing calls affect the perception of predation risk by forest birds? Anim. Behav. 64, 709-714.
11. Dominey, W. 1983: Mobbing in colonially nesting fishes, especially the bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus. Copeia 1983, 1086-1088.
12. Dooling, R. J. 1982: In: Auditory Perception in Birds, Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol.1 (Kroodsma, D. E. & Miller, E. H. eds). Academic Press, New York, pp. 95-130.
13. Doran, P., Gulezian, P. & Betts, M. (in press): A test of the mobbing playback method as a means to estimate bird reproductive success. J. Field Ornithol., in press.
14. East, M. 1981: Alarm calling and parental investment in the robin (Erithacus rubecula). Ibis 123, 223-230.
15. Falls, J. B. 1981: Mapping territory with playback: an accurate census method for songbirds. In: Estimating the Numbers of Terrestrial Birds. Studies in Avian Biology, Vol. 6 (Ralph, C. J. & Scott, J. M. eds). Cooper Ornithol. Soc. Allen Press, Lawrence, KA, pp. 86-91.
16. Forsman, J. & Mönkkönen, M. 2001: Responses by breeding birds to heterospecific song and mobbing playbacks under varying predation risk. Anim. Behav. 62, 1067-1073.
17. Gehlbach, F. R. & Leverett, J. S. 1995: Mobbing of eastern screech-owls: predatory cues, risk to mobbers and degree of threat. Condor 97, 831-834.
18. Gunn, J. S., Desrochers, A., Villard, M. A. & Ibarzabal, J. 2000: Playbacks of mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees as a method to estimate reproductive activity of forest birds. J. Field Ornithol. 71, 472-483.
19. Halupka, L. 1999: Nest defence in an altricial bird with uniparental care: the influence of offspring age, brood size, stage of breeding season and predator type. Ornis Fennica 76, 97-105.
20. Holmes, R. 1994: Black-throated blue warbler (Dendroica caerulescens). In: The Birds of North America. No. 87, American Ornithologists' Union (Poole, A. & Gill, F. eds). Academy of Natural Sciences, Washington, DC, pp. 1-24.
21. Holmes, R. T., Sherry, T. W., Marra, P. P. & Petit, K. E. 1992: Multiple brooding and productivity of a neotropical migrant, the black-throated blue warbler (Dendroica caerulescens), in an unfragmented temperate forest. Auk 109, 321-333.
22. Hurd, C. R. 1996: Interspecific attraction to the mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38, 287-292.
23. Krams, I. & Krama, T. 2002. Interspecific reciprocity explains mobbing behaviour of the breeding chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 269, 2345-2350.
24. Morse, D. H. 1967: The contexts of songs in black-throated green and blackburnian warblers. Wilson Bull. 75, 64-74.
25. Morse, D. H. 1993: Black-throated green warbler (Dendroica virens). In: The Birds of North America. No. 55, American Ornithologists' Union (Poole, A. & Gill, F. eds). Academy of Natural Sciences, Washington, DC, pp. 1-20.
26. Norris, D. R. & Stutchbury, B. J. M. 2001: Extraterritorial movements of a forest songbird in a fragmented landscape. Conserv. Biol. 15, 729-736.
27. Ostreiher, R. 2003. Is mobbing altruistic or selfish behaviour? Anim. Behav. 66, 145-149.
28. Pavey, C. R. & Smyth, A. K. 1998: Effects of avian mobbing on roost use and diet of powerful owls, Ninox strenua. Anim. Behav. 55, 313-318.
29. Pyle, P. 1997: Identification Guide to North American Passerines. Part 1. Columbidae to Plocedae. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas, CA.
30. Rail, J. F., Darveau, M., Desrochers, A. & Huot, J. 1997: Territorial responses of boreal forest birds to habitat gaps. Condor 99, 976-980.
31. SAS Institute Inc. 2001: SAS 8.2 for Windows. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
32. Seeley, T. D., Seeley, R. H. & Akratanakul, P. 1982: Colony defence strategies of the honeybees in Thailand. Ecol. Monogr. 52, 43-63.
33. Shedd, D. H. 1982: Seasonal variation and function of mobbing and related antipredator behaviours of the American robin (Turdus migratorius). Auk 99, 342-346.
34. Shedd, D. H. 1983: Seasonal variation in mobbing intensity in the black-capped chickadee. Wilson Bull. 95, 343-348.
35. Sherman, P. W. 1977: Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science 197, 1246-1253.
36. Shields, W. M. 1984: Barn swallow mobbing-self-defence, collateral kin defense, group defense, or parental care? Behaviour 32, 132-148.
37. St. Clair, C. C. 2003: Comparative permeability of roads, rivers, and meadows to songbirds in Banff National Park. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1151-1160.
38. Steidl, R., Hayes, J. & Schauber, E. 1997: Statistical power analysis in wildlife research. J. Wildl. Manage. 61, 270-279.
39. Stoehr, A. M. 1999: Are significance thresholds appropriate for the study of animal behaviour? Anim. Behav. 57, F22-F25. http://www.elsevier.com/ homepage/sap/AnimalBehaviourForum/1016a.pdfu7 [Last accessed 10th May 2005].
40. Tamura, N. 1989: Snake-directed mobbing by the Formosan squirrel Callosciurys erythraeus thaiwanensis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24, 175-180.
41. Thomas, L. 1997: Retrospective power analysis. Conserv. Biol. 11, 276-280.
42. Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L. & Wells, J. V. 1992: Use of a new reproductive index to evaluate relationships between habitat quality and breeding success. Auk 109, 697-705.
43. Webster, M. S., Chuang-Dobbs, H. C. & Holmes, R. T. 2001: Microsatellite identification of extrapair sires in a socially monogamous warbler. Behav. Ecol. 12, 439-446.
44. Zimmermann, U. & Curio, E. 1988: Two conflicting needs affecting predator mobbing by great tits, Parus major. Anim. Behav. 36, 926-932.