Spectral overlap in songs and temporal avoidance in a peruvian bird assemblage

Ethology

Volumn 114, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 262-271

  Planqué, Robert ^a   Slabbekoorn, Hans ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIRD; COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; FEEDBACK MECHANISM; RAINFOREST; SIGNALING; SONG; TEMPORAL VARIATION; TERRITORIALITY;

ANIMALIA; AVES;

EID: 39049133931     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01461.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Brumm, H. 2006 : Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing. J. Comp. Physiol. A 192, 1279 1285.
2. Brumm, H. Slabbekoorn, H. 2005 : Acoustic communication in noise. Adv. Study Anim. Behav. 35, 151 209.
3. Chek, A. A., Bogart, J. P. Lougheed, S. C. 2003 : Mating signal partitioning in multi-species assemblages: a null model test using frogs. Ecol. Lett. 6, 235 247.
4. Chessel, D., Dufour, A.-.B. Thioulouse, J. 2004 : The ade4 package-I One-table methods. R News 4, 5 10.
5. Cody, M. L. Brown, J. H. 1969 : Song asynchrony in neighbouring bird species. Nature 222, 778 780.
6. Collins, S. 2004 : Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of birdsong. In : Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (Marler, P. Slabbekoorn, H., eds). Elseviers-Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 39 79.
7. Drewry, G. E. Rand, A. S. 1983 : Characteristics of an acoustic community: Puerto Rican frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus. Copeia 4, 941 953.
8. Duellman, W. E. Pyles, R. A. 1983 : Acoustic resource partitioning in anuran communities. Copeia 3, 639 649.
9. Ficken, R. W., Ficken, M. S. Hailman, J. P. 1974 : Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science 183, 762 763.
10. Fleischer, R. C., Boarman, W. I. Cody, M. L. 1985 : Asynchrony of song series in the Bewicks Wren and Wrentit. Anim. Behav. 33, 674 676.
11. Gaioni, S. J. Evans, C. S. 1986 : Perception of distress calls in mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos). Behaviour 99, 250 274.
12. Gerhardt, H. Huber, F. 2002 : Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
13. Greenfield, M. D. 1988 : Interspecific acoustic interaction among katydids Neoconocephalus: inhibition induces shifts in diel periodicity. Anim. Behav. 36, 684 695.
14. Greenfield, M. D. 1994 : Synchronous and alternating choruses in insects and anurans - common mechanisms and diverse functions. Am Zool. 34, 605 615.
15. Hödl, W. 1977 : Call differences and calling site segregation in Anuran species from Central Amazonian floating meadows. Oecologia 28, 351 363.
16. Klump, G. M. 1996 : Bird communication in the noisy world. In : Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (Kroodsma, D. E. Miller, E. H., eds). Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca.
17. Knapton, R. W. 1987 : Intraspecific avoidance and interspecific overlap of song series in the Eastern Meadowlark. Auk 104, 775 779.
18. Littlejohn, M. J. 1959 : Call differentiation in a complex of seven species of Crinia (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Evolution 13, 452 468.
19. Marler, P. Slabbekoorn, H. 2004 : Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong. Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego, USA.
20. Narins, P. M. 1995 : Frog communication. Sci. Am. 273, 78 83.
21. Popp, J. W., Ficken, R. W. Reinartz, J. A. 1985 : Short-term temporal avoidance of interspecific acoustic interference among forest birds. Auk 102, 744 748.
22. Rogers, L. J. Kaplan, G. 2000 : Songs, Roars, and Rituals. Communication in Birds, Mammals, and Other Animals. Harvard Univ. Press, Boston.
23. Römer, H. Bailey, W. 1998 : Strategies for hearing in noise: peripheral control over auditory sensitivity in the bushcricket Sciarasaga quadrata (Austrosaginae: Tettigoniidae). J. Exp. Biol. 201, 1023 1033.
24. Ryan, M. J. Brenowitz, E. A. 1985 : The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am. Nat. 126, 87 100.
25. Schroeder, D. J. Wiley, R. H. 1983 : Communication with shared song themes in tufted titmice. Auk 100, 414 424.
26. Sjölander, K. Beskow, J. 2000 : Wavesurfer: an open source speech tool. In : ICSLP-2000 4, 464 467. See http://www.speech.kth.se/wavesurfer/index. html.
27. Slabbekoorn, H. 2004a : Singing in the wild: the ecology of birdsong. In : Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong (Marler, P. Slabbekoorn, H., eds). Elseviers-Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 178 205.
28. Slabbekoorn, H. 2004b : Habitat-dependent ambient noise: consistent spectral profiles in two African forest types. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 3727 3733.
29. Slabbekoorn, H. den Boer-Visser, A. 2006 : Cities change the songs of birds. Curr. Biol. 16, 2326 2331.
30. Slabbekoorn, H. Peet, M. 2003 : Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424, 267.
31. Slabbekoorn, H. Smith, T. B. 2002 : Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56, 1849 1858.
32. Sueur, J. 2002 : Cicada acoustic communication: potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Cicadidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75, 379 394.
33. Todt, D. Naguib, M. 2000 : Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. Adv. Study Behav. 29, 247 296.
34. de la Torre, S. Snowdon, C. T. 2002 : Environmental correlates of vocal communication of wild pygmy marmosets, Cebuella pygmaea. Anim. Behav. 63, 847 856.
35. Wasserman, F. E. 1977 : Intraspecific acoustical interference in the white-throated sparrow Zonotrichia albicollis. Anim. Behav. 25, 949 952.
36. Zelick, R. Narins, P. M. 1985 : Characterization of the advertisement call oscillator in the frog Elutherodactylus coqui. J. Comp. Physiol. A 156, 223 229.