The evolution of mutualistic interspecific communication: Assessment and management across species

Journal of Comparative Psychology

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 206-209

  Kostan, Karen M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 85047669224     PISSN: 07357036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.116.2.206     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bronstein, J. L. (1994). Our current understanding of mutualism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1, 31-51.
2. Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 282-309). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
3. Dean, W. R. J., Siegfried, W. R., & Macdonald, I. A. W. (1990). The fallacy, fact, and fate of guiding behavior in the Greater honeyguide. Conservation Biology, 4, 99-101.
4. DeVries, P. J. (1990, June 1). Enhancement of symbioses between butterfly caterpillars and ants by vibrational communication. Science, 248, 1104-1106.
5. DeVries, P. J. (1991). Call production by myrmecophilous riodinid and lycaenid butterfly caterpillars (Lepidoptera): Morphological, acoustical, functional, and evolutionary patterns. American Museum Novitates, 3025, 1-23.
6. Doebeli, M., & Knowlton, N. (1998). The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 8676-8680.
7. Gottlieb, G. (1985). Anagenesis: Theoretical basis for the ecological void in comparative psychology. In T. D. Johnston & A. T. Pietrewicz (Eds.), Issues in the ecological study of learning (pp. 59-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Herre, E. A., Knowlton, N., Mueller, U. G., & Rehner, S. A. (1999). The evolution of mutualisms: Exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends in Evolution and Ecology, 14, 49-53.
9. Hurd, C. R. (1996). Interspecific attraction to the mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38, 287-292.
10. Isack, H. A., & Reyer, H.-U. (1989, March 10). Honeyguides and honey gatherers: Interspecific communication in a symbiotic relationship. Science, 243, 1343-1346.
11. King, A. P., West, M. J., & White, D. J. (2002). The presumption of sociality: Social learning in diverse contexts in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116, 173-181.
12. Markl, H. (1985). Manipulation, modulation, information, cognition: Some of the riddles of communication. In B. Holldobler & M. Lindauer (Eds.), Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology (pp. 163-194). Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
13. Marler, P. (1957). Specific distinctiveness in the communication signals of birds. Behaviour, 11, 13-39.
14. McConnell, P. B., & Baylis, J. R. (1985). Interspecific communication in cooperative herding: Acoustic and visual signals from human shepherds and herding dogs. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 67, 302-328.
15. Møller, A. P. (1992). Interspecific response to playback of birdsong. Ethology, 90, 315-320.
16. Morse, D. H. (1970). Ecological aspects of some mixed-species foraging flocks of birds. Ecological Monographs, 40(1), 119-168.
17. Owings, D. H., & Morton, E. S. (1998). Animal vocal communication: A new approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Owings, D. H., Rowe, M. P., & Rundus, A. S. (2002). The rattling sound of rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis) as a communicative resource for ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) and burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116, 197-205.
19. Rasa, O. A. E. (1983). Dwarf mongoose and hornbill mutualism in the Taru Desert, Kenya. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12, 181-190.
20. Schwartz, M. W., & Hoeksema, J. D. (1998). Specialization and resource trade: Biological markets as a model of mutualisms. Ecology, 79, 1029-1038.
21. Shriner, W. M. (1998). Yellow-bellied marmot and golden-mantled ground squirrel responses to heterospecific alarm calls. Animal Behaviour, 55, 529-536.
22. Shriner, W. M. (1999). Antipredator responses to a previously neutral sound by free-living adult golden-mantled ground squirrels, Spermophilus lateralis (Sciurudae). Ethology, 105, 747-757.
23. Snowdon, C. T., & de la Torre, S. (2002). Multiple environmental contexts and communication in pygmy marmosets (Cebuella pygmaea). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116, 182-188.
24. Sullivan, K. A. (1984). Information exploitation by downy woodpeckers in mixed-species flocks. Behaviour, 91, 294-311.
25. Swaisgood, R. R., Owings, D. H., & Rowe, M. P. (1999). Conflict and assessment in a predator-prey system: Ground squirrels versus rattlesnakes. Animal Behaviour, 57, 1033-1044.
26. Tinbergen, N. (1952). Derived activities: Their causation, biological significance, origin and emancipation during evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 27, 1-32.
27. Von Uexküll, J. (1957). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 5-80). New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1934)
28. Wardlaw, J. C., Thomas, J. A., & Elmes, G. W. (2000). Do Maculinea rebeli caterpillars provide vestigial mutualistic benefits to ants when living as social parasites inside Myrmica ant nests? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 95, 97-103.