Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 135, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2009, Pages

  Schabel, Brian J ^a,d   McNamara Jr , James A ^b,d   Franchi, Lorenzo ^c,d   Baccetti, Tiziano ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Temple University School of Medicine   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PARENT; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION STUDY; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHILD; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PARENTS; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; Q-SORT; SEX FACTORS; SMILING; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64349119134     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.019     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Hayes C. The use of patient based outcome measures in clinical decision making. Community Dent Health 15 (1997) 19-21
2. Moore T., Southard K.A., Casko J.S., Qian F., and Southard T.E. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 208-213
3. Roden-Johnson D., Gallerano R., and English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 343-350
4. Cox N.H., and van der Linden F.P.G.M. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod 60 (1971) 175-183
5. Riedel R.A. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 22 (1952) 142-145
6. De Smit A., and Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preferences. Am J Orthod 86 (1984) 67-73
7. Barber J.G., and Ghafari J. Silhouette profiles in the assessment of facial esthetics: a comparison of treated cases with various orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod 87 (1985) 385-391
8. Spyropoulous M.N., and Halazonetis D.J. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119 (2001) 464-471
9. Phillips C., Tulloch C., and Dann C. Rating of facial attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 20 (1992) 214-220
10. O'Neill K., Harkness M., and Knight R. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 (2000) 371-376
11. Hall D., Taylor R.W., Jacobson A., Sadowsky P.L., and Bartolucci A. The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus white Americans as assessed by orthodontists and the lay public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 (2000) 514-525
12. Romani K.L., Agahi F., Nanda R., and Zernik J.H. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod 63 (1993) 175-182
13. Hunt O., Johnston C., Hepper P., Burden D., and Stevenson M. The influence of maxillary gingival exposure on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod 24 (2002) 199-204
14. Faure J.C., Rieffe C., and Maltha J.C. The influence of different facial components of facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 24 (2002) 1-7
15. Soh J., Chew M.T., and Wong H.B. Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (2005) 201-205
16. Kokich V.O., Kiyak H.A., and Shapiro P.A. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 11 (1999) 311-324
17. Schlosser J.B., Preston C.B., and Lampasso J. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 17-24
18. Hulsey C.M. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 57 (1970) 132-144
19. Mackley R.J. An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 63 (1993) 183-189
20. Dunn W.J., Murchison D.F., and Broome J.C. Esthetics: patients' perceptions of dental attractiveness. J Prosthodont 5 (1996) 166-171
21. Ritter D.E., Gandini L.G., Pinto Ados S., and Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod 76 (2006) 198-203
22. Parekh S.M., Fields H.W., Beck M., and Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod 76 (2006) 557-563
23. Johnson D.K., and Smith R.J. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108 (1995) 162-167
24. Boley J.C., Pontier J.P., Smith S., and Fulbright M. Facial changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Angle Orthod 68 (1998) 539-546
25. Kim E., and Gianelly A.A. Extraction vs. nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics. Angle Orthod 73 (2003) 354-358
26. McNamara L., McNamara Jr. J.A., Ackerman M.B., and Baccetti T. Hard and soft tissue contributions to the esthetics of the posed smile in growing patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133 (2008) 491-499
27. Flores-Mir C., Silva E., Barriga M.I., Lagravere M.O., and Major P.W. Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthod 31 (2004) 204-209
28. Weinstein M.C., and Fineberg H.V. Clinical decision analysis (1980), Saunders, Philadelphia
29. Kaplan R.M., and Ernst J.A. Do category rating scales produce biased preference weights for a health index?. Med Care 21 (1983) 193-207
30. Bleichrodt H., and Johannesson M. An experimental test of the theoretical foundation for the rating-scale valuations. Med Decis Making 17 (1997) 208-216
31. Stephenson W. The study of behavior (1953), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
32. Coy K., Speltz M.L., and Jones K. Facial appearance and attachment in infants with orofacial clefts: a replication. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 39 (2002) 66-72
33. Ackerman J.L., Ackerman M.B., Brensinger C.M., and Landis J.R. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res 1 (1998) 2-11
34. Ackerman J.L., and Ackerman M.B. Digital video as a clinical tool in orthodontics: dynamic smile analysis and design in diagnosis and treatment planning. In: McNamara Jr. J.A. (Ed). Information technology and orthodontic treatment. Monograph 40. Craniofacial Growth Series (2003), Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 195-203
35. Fleiss J.L. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed (1981), John Wiley & Sons, New York
36. Howells D.J., and Shaw W.C. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod 88 (1985) 402-408
37. Peck H., and Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 40 (1970) 284-318
38. Conover W.J., and Iman R.L. Rank transformation as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Statistician 35 (1981) 124-129
39. Brisman A.S. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists' and patients' concepts. J Am Dent Assoc 100 (1980) 345-352
40. Bell R., Kiyak H.A., Joondeph D.R., McNeill R.W., and Wallen T.R. Perceptions on facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 88 (1985) 323-332
41. Shaw W.C., Richmond S., O'Brien K.D., and Brook P.H. Quality control in orthodontics: indices of orthodontic treatment need and treatment standards. Br Dent J 170 (1991) 107-112