"Other selves": Moral and legal proposals regarding the personhood of cryopreserved human embryos

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 105-129

  Brugger, E Christian ^a  

^a St John Vianney Theological Seminary   (United States)

Author keywords

Assisted reproductive technology; Cryo preserved embryos; Embryo experimentation; Frozen embryos; Human embryo; Human rights; In vitro fertilization; Personhood

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRYOPRESERVATION; DECISION MAKING; EMBRYO DEATH; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HUMAN EMBRYO; HUMAN RIGHTS; INDIVIDUALIZATION; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; PERSONHOOD; UNITED STATES;

BEGINNING OF HUMAN LIFE; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO RESEARCH; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EUROPE; HUMAN CHARACTERISTICS; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUATION; LEGISLATION, MEDICAL; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PERSONHOOD; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; TWINNING, MONOZYGOTIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 64249167460     PISSN: 13867415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11017-009-9099-z     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Kant, Immanuel. 1964. Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals, trans. H.J. Paton. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
2. Condic, Maureen.L., and Samuel B. Condic. 2005. Defining organisms by organization. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (2): 331-353.
3. Tooley, Michael. 1983. Abortion and infanticide. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Ford, Norman. 1988. When did I begin? Conception of the human individual in history, philosophy and science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Silver, Lee. 1998. Re-making Eden: How genetic engineering and cloning will transform the family. New York: Harper Perennial.
6. Grisez, Germain. 1992. When do people begin? In Abortion: A new generation of Catholic responses, ed. Stephen J. Heaney, 13-18. Braintree: The Pope John Center.
7. Smith, Barry, and Berit Brogaard. 2003. Sixteen days. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 55.
8. Lee, Patrick, and Robert P. George. 2008. Body-self dualism in contemporary ethics and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. George, Robert P., and Christopher Tollefsen. 2008. Embryo: The case for human life. Doubleday.
10. Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso. 2007. Individuality and human beginnings: A reply to David DeGrazia. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35 (3): 457-462.
11. Hurlbut, William B. 2005. Altered nuclear transfer as a morally acceptable means for the procurement of human embryonic stem cells. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 (2): 215.
12. Plusa, B., M. Zernicka-Goetz, et al. 2005. The first cleavage of the mouse zygote predicts the blastocyst axis. Nature 434: 391-395.
13. Callahan, Daniel. 1970. Abortion: Law, choice, and morality. New York: Macmillan.
14. Singer, Peter. 1994. Rethinking life and death: The collapse of our traditional ethics. New York: St. Martin's Press.
15. Donceel S.J., Joseph. 1970. Immediate animation and delayed hominization. Theological Studies 31: 76-105.
16. Donceel S.J., Joseph. 1988. A liberal Catholic's view. In Abortion and Catholicism: The American debate, ed. Thomas Shannon, and Patricia Beattie. Jung, 48-53. New York: Crossroad.
17. Shannon, Thomas A., and Allan B. Wolter. 1990. Reflections on the moral status of the pre-embryo. Theological Studies 51: 603-636.
18. Singer, Peter. 1993. Practical ethics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Aquinas, Thomas. 1981. Summa theologiae, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Westminster, MD: Christian Classics.
20. Austriaco O.P., Nicanor Pier Giorgio. 2002. On static eggs and dynamic embryos: A systems perspective. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 2 (4): 659-683.
21. May, William E. 2008. Catholic bioethics and the gift of human life. Indiana: Our Sunday Visitor Press.
22. Lee, Patrick. 1997. Abortion and unborn human life. Washington, D.C: The Catholic University of America Press.
23. Shaffer, D.R. 2002. Developmental psychology, 6th ed. Australia: Wadsworth-Thomson Learning.
24. Moore, Keith., and T.V.N. Persaud. 2008. The developing human: Clinically oriented embryology. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier.
25. Colloquium, Ramsey. 1995. The inhuman use of human beings: A statement on embryo research. First Things 49: 17-18.
26. Working Party of Linacre Center. 1994. In Euthanasia, clinical practice and the law, ed. Luke Gormally. London: The Linacre Centre for Health Care Ethics.
27. Kass, Leon R. 2002. Life, liberty and the defense of dignity: The challenge for bioethics. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
28. Fogelin, R., and W. Sinnott-Armstrong. 2000. Understanding arguments: An introduction to informal logic, 6th ed. New York: Wadsworth Publishing.
29. Ord, Toby. 2008. The scourge: Moral implications of natural embryo loss. The American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7): 12-19.
30. Leridon, Henri. 1977. Human fertility: The basic components. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Boklage, C.E. 1990. Survival probability of human conceptions from fertilization to term. International Journal of Fertility 35 (2): 75-94.
32. Bailey, Ronald. 2004. Is heaven populated chiefly by the souls of embryos? Reason Online. Available at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/ f-news/1457282/posts. Accessed 9 February 2009.
33. Annas, George. 1989. A French homunculus in a Tennessee court. Hastings Center Report 19 (6): 20-22.
34. Sandel, Michael. 2007. The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
35. Razzell, Peter., and Christine Spence. 2007. The history of infant, child and adult mortality in London, 1550-1850. The London Journal 32 (3): 271-292.
36. John M. Opitz, M.D. 2003. Early embryonic development: An up-to-date account. Transcript of Session 1, President's Council on Bioethics, Meeting Thursday, January 16, 2003. http://www.bioethics.gov/transcripts/ jan03/session1.html. Accessed 5 February 2009.
37. Doerflinger, Richard. 2003. Public comments. President's council on bioethics. Transcripts of January 17, 2003. http://www.bioethics.gov/ transcripts/jan03/public.html. Accessed 9 February 2009.
38. McLaren, Anne. 2007. Commentary: A scientist's view of the ethics of human embryonic stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell 1: 24.
39. Strong, Carson. 1997. Ethics in reproductive and perinatal medicine: A new framework. New Haven: Yale University Press.
40. Hinkley, Charles. 2005. Sophie's choice. Moral conflicts of organ retrieval: A case for constructive pluralism. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V.
41. RAND Law & Health Research Brief. 2003. How many frozen human embryos are available for research? www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/ RB9038/index1.html. Accessed 9 February 2009.
42. Casey, Samuel B. 2007. The frozen waiting to be chosen: Human embryo adoption in America. The Christian Lawyer 3 (2): 13.
43. Forsythe, Clarke D. 2008. Who will fix the Supreme court's mess? Defending life 2008: A state-by-state legal guide to abortion, bioethics, and end-of-life issues. Americans united for life. http://www.aul.org/Defending_Life. Accessed 9 February 2009.
44. Louisiana Code of Law, RS (Revised Statute) 9 (Civil Code Ancillaries), Chap. 3, "Human Embryos," §21, §123, §124, §125, §129, enacted 1986.
45. Casey, Samuel B. 2000. How the law will shape our life and death decisions. In BioEngagement: Making a Christian difference through bioethics today, eds. Nigel Cameron, Scott Daniels, and Barbara White, 143-168. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdemans.
46. Justice Blackmun, Opinion of the Court. 1973. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113.
47. Justice Blackmun, Opinion of the Court. 1973. Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179.
48. Casey, Samuel B. 2008. For whose sake: The current state of human embryo adoption law. Text distributed at Emerging Issues in Embryo Donation & Adoption. Washington, D.C., May 29-31, 2008. Available from National Embryo Donation Center, 116 Concord Road, Suite 400, Farragut, TN 37934.
49. J.B. v. M.D., 783 A.2d 707 (N.J. 2001).
50. Ertelt, Steven. 2005. Pro-life groups support Illinois parents' wrongful embryo death lawsuit, LIFENEWS.COM. Nov. 21, 2005. http://www.lifenews.com/bio1873.html. Accessed 5 January 2009.
51. Genetics & Public Policy Center, Washington, D.C.; information available at www.dnapolicy.org/policy.international.php?countries%5B%5D= 17&action=search&go=Go. Accessed 9 February 2009.
52. Turone, Fabio. 2004. Italy to pass new law on assisted reproduction. British Medical Journal 328: V9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.9-a.
53. Alexander Dorozynski. French doctors criticise new bioethics law. British Medical Journal 309(6968): 1534.
54. Lansac, Jacques. 1996. French law concerning medically-assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction 11 (9): 1843-1847.
55. Reuters Report. February 2008. France recognizes personhood of embryos. http://www.bioedge.org/index.php/bioethics/bioethics_article/8048/. Accessed 13 January 2009.
56. Loi fédérale relative à la recherché sur les cellules souches embryonnaires (Swiss Embryonic Research Act), Sect. 1, Article 1, enacted by referendum April 8, 2004.
57. Belmont Report. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/ belmont.htm. Accessed 13 January 2009.
58. Helsinki Declaration. 1986. In Contemporary issues in bioethics, 2nd ed, eds. Tom L. Beauchamp, and Leroy Walters, 511-512. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
59. Brugger, E. Christian. 2005. In defense of transferring heterologous embryos. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (1): 109-111.
60. Clark, Katrina. 2006. Who's your daddy? My father was an anonymous sperm donor. The Washington Post. December 17. B01.