Transformation direction influences shape-similarity judgments: Research Article

Psychological Science

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 447-454

  Hahn, Ulrike ^a,b   Close, James ^b   Graf, Markus ^c,d  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECOGNITION;

FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 64249158413     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02310.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barlow, H. Hill, R. (1963). Evidence for a physiological explanation for the waterfall phenomenon and figural aftereffects. Nature, 200, 1345 1347.
2. Bertamini, M. (1993). Memory for positions and dynamic representations. Memory & Cognition, 21, 449 457.
3. Catrambone, R., Beike, D. Niedenthal, P. (1996). Is the self-concept a habitual referent in judgments of similarity? Psychological Science, 7, 158 163.
4. Estes, W.K. (1986). Array models for category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 500 549.
5. Estes, W.K. (1994). Classification and cognition. Oxford, England : Oxford University Press.
6. Finke, R.A. Freyd, J.J. (1985). Transformations of visual memory induced by implied motions of pattern elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 780 794.
7. Fox, C.J. Barton, J.J.S. (2007). What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Research, 1127, 80 89.
8. Freyd, J.J. Finke, R.A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 126 132.
9. Gauthier, I. Tarr, M.J. (1997). Orientation priming of novel shapes in the context of viewpoint-dependent recognition. Perception, 26, 51 73.
10. Graf, M. (2002). Form, space and object: Geometrical transformations in object recognition and categorization. Berlin, Germany : Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.
11. Graf, M. (2006). Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 920 945.
12. Graf, M. (in press). Categorization and object shape. In B. Glatzeder, A. von Müller V. Goel (Eds.), Understanding thinking: Vol. II. Towards a theory of thinking: Structures, dynamics, genesis. Berlin, Germany : Springer Verlag.
13. Graf, M., Bundesen, C. Schneider, W.X. (2008). Topological transformations and object shape. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14. Graf, M., Kaping, D. Bülthoff, H.H. (2005). Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 214 221.
15. Graf, M., Reitzner, B., Corves, C., Casile, A., Giese, M. Prinz, W. (2007). Predicting point-light actions in real-time. NeuroImage, 36, T22 T32.
16. Hahn, U. Bailey, T.M. (2005). What makes words sound similar? Cognition, 97, 227 267.
17. Hahn, U., Chater, N. Richardson, L.B. (2003). Similarity as transformation. Cognition, 87, 1 32.
18. Hockema, S.A., Blair, M.R. Goldstone, R.L. (2005). Differentiation for novel dimensions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 953 958). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
19. Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 351 364.
20. Jolicoeur, P. (1992). Orientation congruency effects in visual search. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 280 305.
21. Kohn, A. Movshon, J.A. (2003). Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque. Neuron, 39, 681 691.
22. Leopold, D.A., O'Toole, A.J., Vetter, T. Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89 94.
23. Mather, G., Verstraten, F. Anstis, S. (1998). The motion aftereffect: A modern perspective. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
24. Medin, D.L. Schaffer, M.M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207 238.
25. Murphy, G.L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
26. Nosofsky, R.N. (1992). Stimulus bias, asymmetric similarity, and classification. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 94 140.
27. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Clifford, C. Leopold, D. (2007). The timecourse of higher-level face aftereffects. Vision Research, 47, 2291 2296.
28. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532 547.
29. Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M. Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382 439.
30. Salinas, E. Sejnowski, T.J. (2001). Gain modulation in the central nervous system: Where behavior, neurophysiology, and computation meet. The Neuroscientist, 7, 430 440.
31. Shepard, R.N. (1957). Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrika, 22, 325 345.
32. Shepard, R.N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317 1323.
33. Tarr, M.J. (2003). Visual object recognition: Can a single mechanism suffice? In M.A. Peterson G. Rhodes (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes (pp. 177 211). Oxford, England : Oxford University Press.
34. Tarr, M.J. Gauthier, I. (1998). Do viewpoint-dependent mechanisms generalize across members of a class? Cognition, 67, 71 109.
35. Troje, N.F., Sadr, J., Geyer, H. Nakayama, K. (2006). Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. Journal of Vision, 6, 850 857.
36. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327 352.
37. Tversky, A. Gati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In E. Rosch B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 79 98). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
38. Webster, M.A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y. Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557 561.
39. Yamashita, J.A., Hardy, J.L., De Valois, K.K. Webster, M.A. (2005). Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 420 437.
40. Zaki, S.R. Homa, D. (1999). Concepts and transformational knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 69 115.