Changes in periprosthetic bone remodelling after redesigning an anatomic cementless stem

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 373-379

  Panisello, Juan J ^a,b   Canales, Vicente ^a   Herrero, Luis ^a   Herrera, Antonio ^a   Mateo, Jesús ^a   Caballero, María J ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MIGUEL SERVET   (Spain)

^b Urb Vallesverdes   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REMODELING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 64249137919     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0501-z     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. HS Boden OG Sköldenberg MO Salemyr H-J Lundberg PY Adolphson 2006 Continuous bone loss around a tapered uncemented femoral stem: a long-term evaluation with DEXA Acta Orthop 77 6 877 885
2. A Braun J Papp A Reiter 2003 The periprosthetic bone remodelling process-signs of vital bone reaction Int Orthop 27 Suppl 1 S7 S10
3. Carrasco JL, Díaz M, Honorato J, Pérez R, Rapado A, Ruiz I (1992) Densidad Mineral Ósea en Cuello Femoral. En: Proyecto Multicéntrico de Investigación en Osteoporosis. Estudio de la Densidad Osea de la Población Española. Ed: Pharma Consult. Madrid, Spain
4. B Cohen N Rushton 1995 Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 479 483
5. CA Engh P Massin KE Suthers 1990 Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components Clin Orthop Relat Res 257 107 128
6. CE Gibbons AJ Davis AA Amis H Olearnik BC Parker JE Scott 2001 Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy In Orthop 25 89 92
7. AH Glassman RD Crowninshield R Schenck P Herberts 2001 A low stiffness composite biologically fixed prosthesis Clin Orthop Relat Res 393 128 136
8. T Karachalios C Tsatsaronis G Efraimis P Papadelis G Lyritis G Diakoumopoulos 2004 The long-term clinical relevance of calcar atrophy caused by stress shielding in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year, prospective, randomized study J Arthroplasty 19 469 475
9. J Kärrholm C Anderberg F Snorrason J Thanner N Langeland H Malchau P Herberts 2002 Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness. A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 1651 1658
10. O Kobayashi N Saito M Nawata H Ohta H Horiuchi K Takaoka 2003 Sequential changes in periprosthetic bone mineral density following total hip arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up J Bone Miner Metab 21 229 233
11. H Kröger H Miettinen I Arnala E Koski N Rushton O Suomalainen 1996 Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density J Bone Miner Res 11 1526 1530
12. UG Leichtle CI Leichtle B Schmidt F Martini 2006 Peri-prosthetic bone density after implantation of a custom-made femoral component. A five-year follow-up J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 467 471
13. F Martini S Sell E Kremling W Küsswetter 1996 Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems Int Orthop 20 218 221
14. J McAuley CJ Sychterz CA Ench Sr 2000 Influence of porous coating level on proximal femoral remodeling. A postmortem analysis Clin Orthop Relat Res 371 146 153
15. ES Mortimer L Rosenthall I Paterson JD Bobyn 1996 Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom Clin Orthop Relat Res 324 269 274
16. ON Nagi S Kumar S Aggarwal 2006 The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation Acta Orthop Belg 72 1 55 64
17. T Niinimäki J Junila P Jalovaara 2001 A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding Int Orthop 25 85 88
18. T Nishii N Sugano K Masuhara T Shibuya T Ochi S Tamura 1997 Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 339 121 131
19. Pitto RP, Bhargava A, Pandit S, Walker C, Munro JT (2007) Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop DOI 10.1007/s00264-007-0389-7
20. AI Rahmy T Gosens GM Blake A Tonino I Fogelman 2004 Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss Osteoporos Int 15 281 289
21. L Rosenthall JD Bobyn M Tanzer 1999 Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling Int Orthop 23 325 329
22. CJ Sychterz CA Engh 1996 The influence of clinical factors on periprosthetic bone remodeling Clin Orthop Relat Res 322 285 292
23. CJ Sychterz AM Claus CA Engh 2002 What we have learned about long-term cementless fixation from autopsy retrievals Clin Orthop Relat Res 405 79 91
24. JC Theis G Beadel 2003 Changes in proximal femoral bone mineral density around a hydroxyapatite-coated hip joint arthroplasty J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 11 48 52